Comparison of semen parameters between pregnant and nonpregnant couples with male factor infertility during intrauterine insemination

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 531-536

  Iltemir Duvan, Candan ^a,c   Berker, Bülent ^b   Bayrak, Ömer ^a   Aydos, Kaan ^b   Öztürk Turhan, Nilgün ^a   Şatiroǧlu, Hakan ^b  

^a FATIH UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Male factor; Pregnancy; Semen parameter; Sperm concentration

Indexed keywords

2-GROUP; MALE FACTOR; MALE INFERTILITY; PREGNANCY; SEMEN PARAMETER; SPERM CONCENTRATION;

BODY FLUIDS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); SEMICONDUCTING INTERMETALLICS;

OBSTETRICS;

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; CLOMIFENE CITRATE; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; OVARY FOLLICLE DEVELOPMENT; PREGNANCY RATE; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON DENSITY; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 69249101309     PISSN: 13000144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/sag-0812-15     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. McLachlan RI, de Kretser DM. Male infertility: the case for continued research. Med J Aust 2001 Feb 5; 174(3): 116-117
2. Garceau L, Henderson J, Davis LJ, Petrou S, Henderson LR, McVeigh E et al. Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(12): 3090-3109 Review. (Pubitemid 35469258)
3. Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril. 1999; 71(4): 684-689 (Pubitemid 29149419)
4. Ombelet W, Vandeput H, Van de Putte G, Cox A, Janssen M, Jacobs P, et al. Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Hum Reprod. 1997 Jul; 12(7): 1458-1463
5. Van Waart J, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ, Ombelet W. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7(5): 495-500. Review. (Pubitemid 32827550)
6. Hauser R, Yogev L, Botchan A, Lessing JB, Paz G, Yavetz H. Intrauterine insemination in male factor subfertility: significance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria. Andrologia. 2001; 33(1): 13-17 (Pubitemid 32165197)
7. Van Weert JM, Repping S, Van Voorhis BJ, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Mol BW. Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82(3): 612-620 (Pubitemid 39243182)
8. Miller DC, Hollenbeck BK, Smith GD, Randolph JF, Christman GM, Smith YR, et al. Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Urology. 2002; 60(3):497-501.
9. Huang HY, Lee CL, Lai YM, Chang MY, Wang HS, Chang SYet al. The impact of the total motile sperm count on the success of intrauterine insemination with husband's spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996; 13(1): 56-63.
10. Terada Y, Fukaya T, Haraya H, Yajima A. Sperm motility characteristics and pregnancy outcome of artificial insemination with husband's semen for male infertility. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1995; 177(4): 337-341
11. Milingos S, Comhaire FH, Liapi A, Aravantinos D. The value of semen characteristics and tests of sperm function in selecting couples for intra-uterine insemination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996; 64(1): 115-118 (Pubitemid 126343206)
12. Van Voorhis BJ, Barnett M, Sparks AE, Syrop CH, Rosenthal G, Dawson J. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75(4): 661-668 (Pubitemid 32273499)
13. Brasch JG, Rawlins R, Tarchala S, Radwanska E. The relationship between total motile sperm count and the success of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 1994; 62(1):150-154 (Pubitemid 24198074)
14. Zhao Y, Vlahos N, Wyncott D, Petrella C, Garcia J, Zacur H et al. Impact of semen characteristics on the success of intrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004; 21(5): 143-148 (Pubitemid 38888178)
15. Hendin BN, Falcone T, Hallak J, Nelson DR, Vemullapalli S, Goldberg J et al. The effect of patient and semen characteristics on live birth rates following intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000; 17(5): 245-252 (Pubitemid 30671610)
16. Dadkhah F, Nahabidian A, Ahmadi G. The Correlation between Semen Parameters in Processed and Unprocessed Semen with Pregnancy Rate in Intrauterine Insemination in the Treatment of Male Factor Infertility. Urol J. 2004; 1(4): 273-275
17. Francavilla F, Romano R, Santucci R, Poccia G. Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of intrauterine insemination in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril. 1990; 53(5): 892-897 (Pubitemid 20180482)