Ultrasound assessment of deep tissue injury in pressure ulcers: Possible prediction of pressure ulcer progression

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 124, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 540-550

  Aoi, Noriyuki ^a   Yoshimura, Kotaro ^a   Kadono, Takafumi ^a   Nakagami, Gojiro ^a   Iizuka, Shinji ^a   Higashino, Takuya ^a   Araki, Jun ^a   Koshima, Isao ^a   Sanada, Hiromi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECUBITUS; DISEASE COURSE; ECHOGRAPHY; FASCIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALING; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMMOBILIZATION; MALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TISSUE INJURY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE ULCER; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69249090610     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addb33     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Donnelly J, National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Should we include deep tissue injury in pressure ulcer staging system? The NPUAP debate. J Wound Care 2005;14:207-210.
2. Ankrom MA, Bennett RG, Sprigle S, et al. Pressure-related deep tissue injury under intact skin and current pressure ulcer staging systems. Adv Skin Wound Care 2005;18:35-42.
3. Black JM, National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Moving toward consensus on deep tissue injury and pressure ulcer staging. Adv Skin Wound Care 2005;18:415-416, 418, 420-421.
4. Doughty D, Ramundo J, Bonham P, et al. Issues and challenges in staging of pressure ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006;33:125-130. (Pubitemid 44341604)
5. Berlowitz DR, Brienza DM. Are all pressure ulcers the result of deep tissue injury? A review of the literature. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007;53:34-38.
6. Shea JD. Pressure sores: Classification and management. Clin Orthop. 1975;112:89-100.
7. Black JM, Baharestani M, Cuddiqan M, et al. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system. Dermatol Nurs. 2007;19:343-349.
8. Sanada H, Moriguchi T, Miyachi Y, et al. Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing. J Wound Care 2004;13:13-18.
9. Pressure ulcers in America: Prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. An executive summary of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel monograph. Adv Skin Wound Care 2001;14:208-215.
10. Ohura T, Ohura N Jr, Oka H. Incidence and clinical symptoms of hourglass and sandwich-shaped tissue necrosis in stage IV pressure ulcers. Wounds 2007;19:310-319.
11. Stekelenburg A, Oomens CW, Strijkers GJ, Nicolay K, Bader DL. Compression-induced deep tissue injury examined with magnetic resonance imaging and histology. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:1946-1954. (Pubitemid 43845870)
12. Stekelenburg A, Strijkers GJ, Parusel H, Bader DL, Nicolay K, Oomens CW. Role of ischemia and deformation in the onset of compression-induced deep tissue injury: MRI-based studies in a rat model. J Appl Physiol. 2007;102:2002-2011. (Pubitemid 46701973)
13. Firooznia H, Rafii M, Golimbu C, Lam S, Sokolow J, Kung JS. Computed tomography of pressure sores, pelvic bases, and osteomyelitis in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:545-548. (Pubitemid 13255030)
14. Konya C, Sanada H, Sugama J, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of ultrasound for pressure ulcer staging. Jpn J Pressure Ulcer 1999;1:249.
15. Nagase T, Koshima I, Maekawa T, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of an unusual peri-anal induration: A possible case of deep tissue injury. J Wound Care 2007;16:365-367.
16. Quintavalle PR, Lyder CH, Mertz PJ, Phillips-Jones C, Dyson M. Use of high-resolution, high-frequency diagnostic ultrasound to investigate the pathogenesis of pressure ulcer development. Adv Skin Wound Care 2006;19:498-505.
17. Lyder C. The use of technology for improved pressure ulcer prevention. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007;53:14-16.
18. Zulkowski K. Perineal dermatitis versus pressure ulcer: Distinguishing characteristics. Adv Skin Wound Care 2008;21: 382-388.
19. Kanno N, Nakamura T, Yamanaka M, Kouda K, Nakamura T, Tajima F. Low-echoic lesions underneath the skin in subjects with spinal-cord injury. Spinal Cord 2009;47:225-229.
20. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Burgdorf W. Ultrasound scanning in dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:217-224.
21. Le KM, Madsen BL, Barth PW, Ksander GA, Angell JB, Vistnes LM. An in-depth look at pressure sores using monolithic silicon pressure sensors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;74:745-756.
22. Stekelenburg A, Gawlitta D, Bader DL, Oomens CW. Deep tissue injury: How deep is our understanding? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1410-1413. (Pubitemid 351884993)
23. Gawlitta D, Li W, Oomens CW, Baaijens FP, Bader DL, Bouten CV. The relative contributions of compression and hypoxia to development of muscle tissue damage: An in vitro study. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007;35:273-284. (Pubitemid 46122182)
24. Mubarak SJ, Owen CA, Hargens AR, Garetto LP, Akeson WH. Acute compartment syndromes: Diagnosis and treatment with the aid of the wick catheter. J Bone Joint Surg (Am.) 1978;60:1091-1095. (Pubitemid 9104502)
25. Suga H, Eto H, Shigeura T, et al. IFATS collection: Fibroblast growth factor-2-by adipose-derived stromal cells inhibits postinjury fibrogenesis through a c-Jun N-terminal kinase-dependent mechanism. Stem Cells 2009;27:238-249.
26. Kokate JY, Leland KJ, Sparrow EM, Iaizzo PA. Critical thresholds for pressure ulcer formation in a porcine model. Wounds 1997;9:111-121. (Pubitemid 127111831)
27. Salcido R, Donofrio JC, Fisher SB, et al. Histopathology of pressure ulcers as a result of sequential computer controlled pressure sessions in a fuzzy rat model. Adv Wound Care 1994; 7:23-24, 26.
28. Nola GT, Vistness LM. Differential response of skin and muscle in the experimental production of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:728-733.
29. Rigotti G, Marchi A, Galiè M, et al. Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: A healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1409-1422; discussion 1423-1424. (Pubitemid 46559108)