Imitation of lateralised body movements: Doing it the hard way

Laterality

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 515-527

  Press, Clare ^a   Ray, Elizabeth ^a   Heyes, Cecilia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action observation; Imitation; Mirror neuron; Mirror system; Spatial compatibility; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANATOMICAL CONCEPTS; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMITATION; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; ROTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION;

EID: 69149103367     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: 14640678     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576500802607990     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Avikainen, S., Wohlschläger, A., Liuhanen, S., Hanninen, R., & Hari, R. (2003). Impaired mirrorimage imitation in Asperger and high-functioning autistic subjects. Current Biology, 13, 339-341.
2. Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Kerzel, D. (2004). A Simon effect with stationary moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 39-55.
3. Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 489-495.
4. Buxbaum, L. J., Kyle, K., Grossman, M., & Coslett, H. B. (2007). Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: Evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex, 43 411-423.
5. Franz, E. A., Ford, S., & Werner, S. (2007). Brain and cognitive processes of imitation in bimanual situations: Making inferences about mirror neuron systems. Brain Research, 1145, 138-149.
6. Gordon, H. (1922). Hand and ear tests. British Journal of Psychology 13, 283-300.
7. Heyes, C. M. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 253-261.
8. Heyes, C., & Ray, E. (2004). Spatial S-R compatibility effects in an intentional imitation task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 703-708.
9. Heyes, C.M., & Ray, E. D. (2000). What is the significance of imitation in animals? Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 29, 215-145.
10. Ishikura, T., & Inomata, K. (1995). Effects of angle of model-demonstration on learning of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 651-658.
11. Koski, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Woods, R. P., & Mazziotta, J. C. (2003). Modulation of cortical activity during different imitative behaviours. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 460-471.
12. Koski, L., Molnar-Szakacs, I., & Iacoboni, M. (2005). Exploring the contributions of premotor and parietal cortex to spatial compatibility using image-guided TMS. Neuroimage, 24, 296-305.
13. Maruishi, M., Tanaka, Y., Muranaka, H., Tsuji, T., Ozawa, Y., Imaizumi, S., et al. (2004). Brain activation during manipulation of the myoelectric prosthetic hand: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage, 21, 1604-1611.
14. Perani, D., Fazio, F., Borghese, N. A., Tettamanti, M., Ferrari, S., Decety, J., et al. (2001). Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage, 14, 749-758.
15. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
16. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Cross-modal re-mapping influences the Simon effect. Memory and Cognition, 30, 18-23.
17. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
18. Wapner, S., & Cirillo, L. (1968). Imitation of a model's hand movements: Age changes in transposition of left-right relations. Child Development, 39, 887-894.