Landscape structure along urban-rural gradients: Aisén river watershed (Aisén region, Chile);Estructura del paisaje a lo largo de gradientes urbano-rurales en la cuenca del río aisén (región de Aisén, Chile)

Revista Chilena de Historia Natural

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 73-82

  Torres Gómez, Marcela ^a   Delgado, Luisa E ^a   Marín, Víctor H ^a   Bustamante, Ramiro O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Ais n watershed; Hemeroby index; Intervention level; Landscape structure; Urban rural gradient

Indexed keywords

EID: 69149095308     PISSN: 0716078X     EISSN: 07176317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BASTIAN O (2001) Landscape ecology-towards a unified discipline? Landscape Ecology 17: 757-766.
2. CALDWELL LK (1990) Landscape, law and public policy: conditions for an ecological perspective. Landscape Ecology 5: 3-8.
3. CORPORACIÓN NACIONAL FORESTAL (CONAF) Y COMISIÓN NACIONAL DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE (CONAMA) (1999) Catastro y evaluación de los recursos vegetacionales nativos de Chile. Informe nacional con variables ambientales, Corporación Nacional Forestal, Ministerio de Agricultura, Santiago, Chile (Versión en CD).
4. DELGADO LE & MM YARROW (2005) Deliverable 1.4. Report on: maps of land use and vegetation cover Aisén - Chile. Proyecto ECOManage. URL: http://www.ecomanage.info/Documents/work-packages.htm (Accedido el 9 de marzo de 2006).
5. DELGADO LE & VH MARÍN (2005) FES-sistemas: un concepto para la incorporación de las sociedades humanas en el análisis medioambiental en Chile. Revista Ambiente y Desarrollo 21: 18-22.
6. DE MIGUEL J, M CASADO, B ACOSTA, A DEL POZO, C OVALLE, C HEPP, H HELIZALDE, E ZAGAL, M GERDING, J BARRERA & L FINOT (2005) Caracterización ecológica y agronómica de la interacción bosque-pradera para la elaboración de un modelo sostenible de explotación silvopastoral en la región patagónica de Aisén (Chile). URL: http://www.inia.cl/geam/ Proyectos/Biodiversidad.pdfearch=%22%22de%20miguel%22%20aysen%22 (Accedido el 6 de abril de 2006).
7. DUTILLEUL P (1998) Incorporating scale in ecological experiments: study desing. En: Peterson DL & VT Parker (eds) Ecological scale: theory and applications: 369-386. Columbia University press, New York, USA.
8. HERZOG F & A LAUSCH (1999) Prospects and limitations of the application of landscape metrics for landscape monitoring. En: Maudsley M & J Marshall (eds) Heterogeneity in landscape ecology: pattern and scale: 41-50. Aberdeen, IALE, United Kingdom.
9. HERZOG F, A LAUSCH, E MÜLLER, H THULKE, U STEINHARDT & S LEHMANN (2001) Landscape metrics for assessment of landscape destruction and rehabilitation. Environmental Management 27: 91-107.
10. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICAS (INE) (2002) Base de datos Censo 2002, [CD-ROM], Gobierno de Chile, Chile.
11. LAUSCH A & F HERZOG (2002) Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecological Indicators 2: 3-15.
12. LI H & J WU (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology 19: 389-399.
13. LOCKABY B, D ZHANG, J MCDANIEL, H TIAN & S PAN (2005) Interdisciplinary research at the urbanrural interface: the WestGa project. Urban Ecosystems 8: 7-21.
14. MACHADO A (2004) An index of naturalness. Journal for Nature Conservation 12: 95-110.
15. MARTÍNEZ W (2004) Estudio integrado del grado de antropización (INRA) a escala del paisaje: propuesta metodológica y evaluación. URL: http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/00001436/00/ MartinezDuenas-Estudio-040607-Paper266.pdfearch= %22grado%20de%20antropizacion%22 (Accedido 3 de mayo de 2006).
16. MCDONNELL MJ & STA PICKET (1990) Ecosystem structure and Function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71: 1232-1237.
17. MCDONNELL MJ, STA PICKETT, P GROFFMAN, P BOHLEN, RV POUYAT, WC ZIPPERER, RW PARMELEE, MM CARREIRO & K MEDLEY (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1: 21-36.
18. MCGARIGAL K, S CUSHMAN, C NEEL & E ENE (2002) FRAGSTATS version 3.3: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. URL: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/ research/fragstats/fragstats.html. (Accedido 6 de septiembre de 2005).
19. MEDLEY KE, STA PICKETT & MJ MCDONNELL (1995) Forest-landscape structure along and urbanto-rural gradient. Professional Geographer 47: 159-168.
20. NAVEH Z (1987) Biocybernetic and thermodynamic perspectives of landscape functions and land use patterns. Landscape Ecology 1: 75-83.
21. NAVEH Z (2001) Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 268-284.
22. NAVEH Z & Y CARMEL (2002) Landscape complexity versus ecosystem complexity: Implication for landscape planning and management. XII Congresso Nazionale della Società Italiana di Ecologia - S. It. E. Atti 00 Urbino La Complessità in Ecologia. URL: http://www.technion. ac.il/technion/agr/members/naveh.html (Accedido 15 de marzo de 2007).
23. ORTEGA H & A BRÜNING (2004) Aisén, panorama histórico y cultural, Región de Aisén. URL: http://www.aisenpanorama.cl. (Accedido 5 de mayo de 2006).
24. SECRETARÍA REGIONAL MINISTERIAL DE PLANIFICACIÓN Y COORDINACIÓN (SERPLAC) REGIÓN DE AISÉN (2005) Plan regional de ordenamiento territorial. Coihaique, Chile. URL: http://serplac11.serplac. cl/link.cgi/Publicaciones/278 (Accedido 10 de diciembre de 2005).
25. STATSOFT, INC. (2001) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6.0 www.statsoft.com
26. STEINHARDT U, F HERZOG, A LAUSCH, E MÜLLER & S LEHMANN (1999) Hemeroby index for landscape monitoring and evaluation. En: Pykt Y, Hyatt D & Lenz R (eds) Environmental indices, system analysis approach: 237-254. EOLSS Publications, Oxford, United Kingdom. URL: http://www.ufz.de/data/lausch- hemeroby-ende 11534.pdf#search=%22hemeroby%20index%22 (Accedido 3 de mayo de 2006).
27. TURNER MG (1990) Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology 4: 21-30.
28. TURNER MG, S PEARSON, P BOLSTAD & D WEAR (2003) Effects of land-cover change on spatial pattern of forest communities in the southern Appalachian Mountains (USA). Landscape Ecology 18: 449-464.
29. WEAK DN, MG TURNER & RJ NAIMAN (1998) Land cover along an urban-rural gradient: implications for water quality. Ecological Applications 8: 219-230.
30. YARROW MM & VH MARÍN (2007) Toward conceptual cohesiveness: a historical analysis of the theory and utility of ecological boundaries and transition zones. Ecosystems 10: 462-476.
31. ZHENG D, D WALLING & Z HAO (1997) Rates and pattern of landscape change between 1972 and 1988 in the Chinghai mountain area of China and north Korea. Landscape Ecology 12: 241-254.