Dynamic scheme for generating number squeezing in Bose-Einstein condensates through nonlinear interactions

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Haine, Simon A ^a,b   Johnsson, Mattias T ^a,c  

^a School of Physical Sciences   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC MODELS; ATOMIC INTERACTIONS; ATOMIC SPECIES; BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES; HYPERFINE LEVELS; MULTIMODES; NONLINEAR INTERACTIONS; POISSONIAN; QUANTUM FIELD; QUANTUM LIMIT; SHOT-NOISE;

ATOMS; BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION;

STEAM CONDENSERS;

EID: 69149088622     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.023611     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997).
2. J. Esteve, C. Gross, A. Weller, S. Giovanazzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nature (London) 455, 1216 (2008). 10.1038/nature07332
3. J. P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4736 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.4736
4. M. K. Olsen, A. S. Bradley, S. A. Haine, and J. J. Hope, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 160, 331 (2008). 10.1140/epjst/e2008-00736-5
5. M. T. Johnsson and J. J. Hope, Phys. Rev. A 75, 043619 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.043619
6. S. Wüster, B. J. Dabrowska-Wüster, S. M. Scott, J. D. Close, and C. M. Savage, Phys. Rev. A 77, 023619 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.023619
7. M. T. Johnsson and S. A. Haine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 010401 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.010401
8. A. Sørensen, L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 409, 63 (2001). 10.1038/35051038
9. S. Thanvanthri and Z. Dutton, Phys. Rev. A 75, 023618 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.023618
10. Y. Li, Y. Castin, and A. Sinatra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210401 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.210401
11. G. Nandi, A. Sizmann, J. Fortàgh, C. Weiß, and R. Walser, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013605 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.013605
12. C.-S. Chuu, F. Schreck, T. P. Meyrath, J. L. Hanssen, G. N. Price, and M. G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260403 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260403
13. C. Samuelis, E. Tiesinga, T. Laue, M. Elbs, H. Knöckel, and E. Tiemann, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012710 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.012710
14. A. A. Norrie, R. J. Ballagh, and C. W. Gardiner, Phys. Rev. A 73, 043617 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.043617
15. D. M. Harber, H. J. Lewandowski, J. M. McGuirk, and E. A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. A 66, 053616 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.053616
16. T. Bourdel, T. Donner, S. Ritter, A. Öttl, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, Phys. Rev. A 73, 043602 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.043602
17. A. Görlitz, T. L. Gustavson, A. E. Leanhardt, R. Löw, A. P. Chikkatur, S. Gupta, S. Inouye, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 090401 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.090401
18. We were unaware of the favorable inelastic loss rates for the | F=1, mF =1, | F=2, mF =2 collisions at the time when we performed the calculations.