Comparison between nitrate and pesticide removal from ground water using adsorbents and NF and RO membranes

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 170, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 1210-1217

  Tepuš, Brigita ^a   Simonič, Marjana ^b   Petrinić, Irena ^b,c  

^a Komunalno podjetje Ptuj   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR   (Slovenia)

^c doo   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Atrazine; Nanofiltration; Nitrate; Reverse osmosis

Indexed keywords

AFTER-TREATMENT; ATRAZINE; ATRAZINE REMOVAL; ATRAZINES; CONCENTRATION VALUES; DEETHYLATRAZINE; DEISOPROPYLATRAZINE; PESTICIDE REMOVAL; RO MEMBRANE; SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL; SLOVENIA; STYRENE-DIVINYLBENZENE;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT; ADSORPTION; DEWATERING; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; HERBICIDES; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; NITRATES; NITROGEN REMOVAL; POLYSTYRENES; RESINS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; WATER FILTRATION; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

2 AMINO 4 CHLORO 6 ETHYLAMINO 1,3,5 TRIAZINE; ACTIVATED CARBON; ATRAZINE; DEETHYLATRAZINE; GROUND WATER; NITRATE;

ADSORPTION; ATRAZINE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FILTRATION; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; NITRATE; POLLUTANT REMOVAL;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; MEMBRANE FILTER; NANOFILTRATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SLOVENIA; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER POLLUTION; WATER TREATMENT;

ADSORPTION; ATRAZINE; COMPOSITE RESINS; HERBICIDES; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; NITRATES; OSMOSIS; PESTICIDES; PILOT PROJECTS; THERMODYNAMICS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 69049101021     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.105     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Hallberg R. Agricultural chemicals in groundwater: extent and implications. Am. J. Alternative Agric. 2 1 (1987) 3-15
2. Kobayashi K., Rompas R.M., Maekawa T., Imada N., and Oshima Y. Studies on the relation between toxicity and metabolism of organophosphorus insecticides in shrimps. 5. Changes in metabolic-activity of tiger shrimp larvae at different stages to fenitrothion, an organophosphorus insecticide. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 56 3 (1990) 489-496
3. Tepus B., and Simonič M. The effect of platinum catalyst on decomposition of ozone and atrazine removal. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 1 (2007) 1-7
4. Taylor J.S., and Hong S.K. Potable water quality and membrane technology. Lab Med. 31 10 (2000) 563-568
5. Hong S.K., and Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 132 (1997) 159-181
6. Elimelech M., Zhu Z.H., Childress A.E., and Hong S. Role of surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite polyamide RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 127 1 (1997) 101-109
7. Kosutic K., and Kunst B. Removal of organics from aqueous solutions by commercial RO and NF membranes of characterized porosities. Desalination 142 1 (2002) 47-56
8. Jiang H., and Adams C. Treatability of chloro-s-triazines by conventional drinking water treatment technologies. Water Res. 40 (2006) 1657-1667
9. Adams C.D., and Watson T.L. Treatability of s-triazine herbicide metabolites using powdered activated carbon. J. Environ. Eng. (1996) 327-330
10. Pryor M.J., Nozaic D., Freese S.D., and Rajagopaul R. The use of granular activated carbon for the treatment of impounded surface water. Water Sci. Technol. 39 10-11 (1999) 197-200
11. Lemić J., Kovačević D., Tomašević-Čanović M., Kovačević D., Stanić T., and Pfend R. Removal of atrazine, lindane and diazinone from water by organo-zeolites. Water Res. 40 (2006) pp. 1097-1085
12. Brown N.W., Roberts E.P.L., Chasiotis A., Cherdron T., and Sanghrajka N. Atrazine removal using adsorption and electrochemical regeneration. Water Res. 38 (2004) 3067-3074
13. Dhab F.M. Treatment alternatives for nitrate contaminated groundwater supplies. J. Environ. Syst. 17 (1987) 65-75
14. Norberg D., Hong S., Taylor J., and Zhao Y. Surface characterization and performance evaluation of commercial fouling resistant low-pressure RO membranes. Desalination 202 1-3 (2007) 45-52
15. Košutić K., Kastelan-Kunst L., and Kunst B. Porosity of some commercial reverse osmosis and nanofiltration polyamide thin-film composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 168 (2000) 101
16. Petrinic I., Andersen N.P.R., Sostar-Turk S., and Majcen le Marechal A. The removal of reactive dye printing compounds using nanofiltration. Dyes Pigments 74 3 (2007) 512-518
17. Arnold S.M., Hickey W.J., and Harris R.F. Degradation of atrazine by fentons reagent - condition optimization and product quantification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29 8 (1995) 2083-2089
18. Dvarionienė J., Stasiškienė Z., and Knudsen H.H. Pilot scale membrane filtration study on water reuse of rinsing water after reactive cotton dyeing. Environ. Res. Eng. Manage. 25 (2003) 3-10
19. Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater engineering treatment and reuse, fourth edition, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2003 (Chapter 11).
20. Wang G.-S., and Alben K.T. Effect of pre-adsorped background organic matter on granular activated carbon adsorption of atrazine. Sci. Total Environ. 224 (1988) 221-226
21. Ayranci E., and Hoda N. Adsorption kinetics and isotherms of pesticides onto activated carbon-cloth. Chemosphere 60 (2005) 1600-1607
22. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology (2003), Kluwer Academic
23. Seidel A., Waypa J.J., and Elimelech M. Role of charge Donnan exclusion in removal of arsenic from water by a negatively charged porous nanofiltration membrane. Environ. Eng. Sci. 18 (2001) 105-113
24. Schonauer A., and Samhaber W.M. The specific behaviour of NF membranes in the separation of high ionic strength electrolyte solutions. 14th International Congress of Chem. and Process Eng (CHISA 2000). Prague (August 2000)
25. Paschke A., Neitzel P.L., Walther W., and Schuurlnann G. Octanol/water partition coefficient of selected herbicides: determination using shake-flask method and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chem. Eng. Data 49 (2004) 1639-1642
26. Verliefde A., Cornellisen E., Amy G., Van der Bruggen B., and van Dyek H. Priority organic micropollutants in water sources in Flanders and Netherlands and assessment of removal possibilities with nanofiltration. Environ. Pollut. 146 (2007) 281-289
27. Van der Bruggen B., Braeken B., and Vandecasteele C. Evaluation of parameters describing flux decline innanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds. Desalination 147 (2002) 281-288
28. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., and Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment-a literature review. Water Res. 38 (2004) 2795-2809
29. Petrinić I., Pušić T., Mijatović I., Simončič B., and Šostar-Turk S. Characterization of polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Kem. Ind. 56 (2007) 561-567
30. Van der Bruggen B., Everaert K., Wilms D., and Vandecasteele C. Application of nanofiltration for removal of pesticides, nitrate and hardness from ground water: rejection properties and economic evaluation. J. Membr. Sci. 193 (2001) 239-248
31. Braeken L., Ramaekers R., Zhang Y., Maes G., Van der Bruggen B., and Vandecasteele C. Influence of hydrophobicity on retention in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds. J. Membr. Sci. 252 (2005) 195-203
32. Nghiem L.D., Schäfer A.I., and Elimelech M. Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2005) 7698-7705