The role of luck in the strategy-performance relationship

Management Decision

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1000-1021

  Parnell, John A ^a   Dent, Eric B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT PEMBROKE   (United States)

Author keywords

Business performance; Competitive strategy; Management strategy; Organizational performance; Risk management

Indexed keywords

EID: 68949217700     PISSN: 00251747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00251740910966703     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adaval, R. (2006), Culture and cognition: the case of irrational beliefs about luck, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, pp. 623-37.
2. Atwood, C.L. (2007), Beating the odds in the business of gaming, paper presented at the AACSB Dean's Conference, Las Vegas, NV, February.
3. Austin, J.H. (2003), Chase, Chance, and Creativity, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Barney, J.B. (1986), Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy, Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 1231-41.
5. Barney, J.B. and Hoskisson, R.E. (1990), Strategic groups: untested assertions and research proposals, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 187-98.
6. Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1997), Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, 2nd ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
7. Bourgeois, L.J. (1981), On the measurement of organizational slack, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, pp. 29-39.
8. Celentani, M. and Loveira, R. (2006), A simple explanation of the relative performance evaluation puzzle, Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 9, pp. 525-40.
9. Charness, G. and Levine, D.I. (2007), Intention and stochastic outcomes: an experimental study, Economic Journal, Vol. 117 No. 522, pp. 1051-72.
10. Cheng, J.L.C. and Kesner, I.F. (1997), Organizational slack and environmental shifts: the impact of resource allocation patterns, Journal of Management, Vol. 23, pp. 1-18.
11. Chowdhury, S. (2005), Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important?, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20, pp. 727-46.
12. David, J.S., Hwang, Y., Pei, B.K.W. and Reneau, J.H. (2002), The performance effects of congruence between product competitive strategies and purchasing management design, Management Science, Vol. 48, pp. 866-85.
13. Day, L. and Maltby, J. (2003), Belief in good luck and psychological well-being: the mediating role of optimism and irrational beliefs, Journal of Psychology, Vol. 137 No. 1, pp. 99-110.
14. DeCarlo, T.E., Agarwal, S. and Vyas, S.B. (2007), Performance expectations of salespeople: the role of past performance and causal attributions in independent and interdependent cultures, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 133-47.
15. Denrell, J. (2005), Should we be impressed with high performance?, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 14, pp. 292-8.
16. Denrell, J., Arvidsson, N. and Zander, U. (2004), Managing knowledge in the dark: an empirical study of the reliability of capability in evaluations, Management Science, Vol. 50, pp. 1491-503.
17. Dent, E.B. (1999), Complexity science: a worldview shift, Emergence: The Journal of Complexity in Management and Organizations, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 5-19.
18. Dent, E.B. (2003), The interactional model: an alternative to the direct cause and effect construct for mutually causal organizational phenomena, Foundations of Science, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 295-314.
19. Dent, E.B. and Powley, E.H. (2004), Worldview assumptions: paradigm shift in progress, Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 280-306.
20. Dooley, K.J. (1997), A complex adaptive systems model of organizational change, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 69-97.
21. Elenkov, D. and Fileva, T. (2006), Anatomy of a business failure: accepting the 'bad luck' explanation vs. proactively learning in international business, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 132-41.
22. Ellis, A.P.J., Ilgen, D.R. and Hollenbeck, J.R. (2006), The effects of team leader race on performance evaluations: an attributional perspective, Small Group Research, Vol. 37, pp. 295-332.
23. Galbreath, J. and Galvin, P. (2006), Accounting for performance variation: how important are intangible assets?, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 150-70.
24. Goll, I., Johnson, N.B. and Rasheed, A.A. (2007), Knowledge capability, strategic change, and firm performance: the moderating role of the environment, Management Decision, Vol. 45, pp. 161-79.
25. Green, S.G. and Mitchell, T.R. (1979), Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 23, pp. 429-58.
26. Hafer, J. and Gresham, G.G. (2008), Luck's role in business success: why it's too important to leave to chance, Journal of Applied and Behavioral Management, Vol. 10, pp. 295-315.
27. Hart, S. and Banbury, C. (1994), How strategy-making processes can make a difference, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 251-69.
28. Harung, H.S. (1999), Invincible Leadership: Building Peak Performance Organizations by Harnessing the Unlimited Power of Consciousness, Maharishi University of Management Press, Fairfield, IA.
29. Hofstadter, D.R. (1982), Number numbness, or why innumeracy may be just as dangerous as illiteracy, Scientific American, Vol. 246 No. 5, pp. 20-34.
30. Jacobson, R. (1988), The persistence of abnormal returns, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 41-58.
31. Jones, E.E. and Harris, V.A. (1967), The attribution of attitudes, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3, pp. 1-24.
32. King, A.W. and Zeithaml, C. (2001), Competencies and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradox, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 75-99.
33. Kosowski, R., Timmermann, A., White, H. and Wermers, R. (2006), Can mutual fund 'stars' really pick stocks? New evidence from a bootstrap analysis, Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, pp. 2551-95.
34. Kovenklioglu, G. and Greenhaus, J.H. (1978), Causal attributions, expectations, and task performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 698-705.
35. Leask, G. and Parnell, J.A. (2005), Integrating strategic groups and the resource-based perspective: enhancing our understanding of the competitive process, European Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 458-70.
36. Lippman, S.A. and Rumelt, R. (1984), Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 418-38.
37. McEvily, S. and Chakravarthy, B. (2002), The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 285-305.
38. McGahan, A.M. and Porter, M.E. (1997), How much does industry matter, really?, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 15-30.
39. Ma, H. (2002), Competitive advantage: what's luck got to do with it?, Management Decision, Vol. 40 No. 6, pp. 525-36.
40. Mancke, R.B. (1974), Causes of interfirm profitability differences: a new interpretation of the evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 181-93.
41. Mancke, R.B. (1977), Interfirm profitability differences: reply, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 91 No. 4, pp. 677-80.
42. March, J.G. and Shapira, Z. (1987), Managerial perspectives on risk and risk-taking, Management Science, Vol. 33 No. 11, pp. 1404-18.
43. March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (1958), Organizations, Wiley, New York, NY.
44. March, J.G. and Sutton, R.I. (1997), Organizational performance as a dependent variable, Organization Science, Vol. 8 No. 6, pp. 698-710.
45. Maslow, A.H. (1962), Toward a Psychology of Being, D. Van Nostrand Co., Princeton, NJ.
46. Merton, R.C. (1968), The Matthew effect in science, Science, Vol. 159, pp. 56-63.
47. Meyer, J.P. (1980), Causal attributions for success and failure: a multivariate investigation of dimensionality, formation, and consequences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 38, pp. 704-15.
48. Meyer, J.P. and Koelbl, S.L.M. (1982), Dimensionality of students' causal attributions for test performance, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 8, pp. 31-6.
49. Moizer, P. and Pratt, J. (1988), The evaluation of performance in firms of chartered accountants, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 18 No. 71, pp. 227-37.
50. Morgan, N.A. and Rego, L.L. (2009), Brand portfolio strategy and firm performance, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73, pp. 59-74.
51. Morrow, J.L. Jr, Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A. and Holcomb, T.R. (2007), Creating value in the face of declining performance: firm strategies and organizational recovery, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 271-83.
52. Musteen, M., Barker, V.L. and Baeten, V.L. (2006), CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: the direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, pp. 604-12.
53. O'Regan, N., Hughes, T. and Wornham, D. (2008), Are we asking the right questions? Closing the academic/practitioner gap in strategic management, paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA, August 13.
54. Parnell, J.A. (2005), Managing paradoxes in strategic decision making, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 708-24.
55. Parnell, J.A. and Dent, E.B. (2008), Better lucky than good? The role of luck in strategy-performance research, paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA, August 13.
56. Parnell, J.A., Lester, D.L. and Menefee, M.L. (2000), Strategy as a response to organizational uncertainty: an alternative perspective on the strategy-performance relationship, Management Decision, Vol. 38, pp. 520-30.
57. Paulos, J.A. (1988), Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences, Hill and Wang, New York, NY.
58. Peters, T. and Waterman, R.H. (1982), In Search of Excellence, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
59. Powell, T.C. (1996), How much does industry matter? An alternative empirical test, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 323-34.
60. Powell, T.C., Lovallo, D. and Carnigal, C. (2006), Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, pp. 175-96.
61. Pritchard, D. and Smith, M. (2004), The psychology and philosophy of luck, New Ideas in Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 1-28.
62. Reed, R. and DeFillippi, R. (1990), Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, pp. 88-102.
63. Rescher, N. (1995), Luck: The Brilliant Randomness of Everyday Life, Farrar Straus Giroux, New York, NY.
64. Rose, R.C., Kumar, N. and Ibrahim, H.I. (2008), The effect of manufacturing strategy on organizational performance, Performance Improvement, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 18-25.
65. Rumelt, R. (1984), Towards a strategic theory of the firm, in Lamb, R. (Ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 556-70.
66. Simon, H.A. (1947), Administrative Behavior, The Free Press, New York, NY.
67. Simon, H.A. (1960), The New Science of Management Decision, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
68. Stone, W.S. and Tudor, T.R. (2005), The effects of functional background experience, industry experience, generic executive management experience on perceived environmental uncertainty and firm performance, Advances in Competitiveness Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-8.
69. Taleb, N.N. (2007), The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, Random House, New York, NY.
70. Tepper, B.J. (2006), What do managers do when subordinates just say 'no'?, in Schrieshiem, C.A. and Neider, L.L. (Eds), Power and Influence in Organizations: New Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, pp. 1-20.
71. Wiseman, R. (2003), The Luck Factor: Changing your Luck, Changing your Life: The Four Essential Principles, Hyperion, New York, NY.