Pterygium surgery: Comparative study of conjunctival autograft with suture versus fibrin adhesive;Cirugía del pterigión: Estudio comparativo entre autoinjerto conjuntival con sutura y con adhesivo tisular

Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 179-184

  Miranda rollon M D ^a,b   Perez Gonzalez L E ^a   Sentieri Omarrementeri A A ^a   Martinez RrdriGuez R ^a   Parente HernaNdez B ^a   Junceda Moreno, J ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DE CABUEÑES   (Spain)

^b NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Autograft, fibrin glue; Postoperative discomfort; Pterygium surgery; Recurrence

Indexed keywords

FIBRIN GLUE; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONJUNCTIVA; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PTERYGIUM; RECURRENT DISEASE; SUTURING METHOD; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONJUNCTIVA; CONJUNCTIVITIS; FEMALE; FIBRIN TISSUE ADHESIVE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PTERYGIUM; RECURRENCE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TISSUE ADHESIVES; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 68949208478     PISSN: 03656691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Iradier Urrutia MT. Cirugía del pterigión. Madrid: Macline. 2006.
2. Barraquer RI. Pterigión y pinguécula. En: Benítez del Castillo JM, Duran de la Colina JA, Rodríguez Ares MT. Superficie Ocular. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. 2004.
3. 3. Sangwan V, Murihy SI, Bansal AK. Surgical treatment of chronically recurring pterygium. Cornea 2003; 22: 63-65. (Pubitemid 36076685)
4. Dadeya S. Autografting of marginal conjuntiva. Ophtalmologica 2003; 217: 237-238.
5. 5. Maheshwari S. Split- conjuntival grafts for double head pterygium. Indian J Opth 2005; 53: 53-55. (Pubitemid 40524392)
6. 6. Dadeya S, Malik KP, Gulliani BP. Pterygium surgery: conjuntival rotation autograft versus conjuntival autograft. Ophtalmie Surg Lasers 2002; 33: 269-274. (Pubitemid 34778875)
7. 7. Karabatsas CH, Marsh GW, Cook AM. Different therapeutic approaches and outcome in the treatment of pterygium. Eur J Ophtalmol 1998; 8:148-152. (Pubitemid 28459508)
8. Varssano D, Michaeli-Cohen A, Loewenstein A. Excision of pterygium and conjuntival autograft. Isr Med Assoc J 2002; 4:1097-1100.
9. 9. Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD. Comparison fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjuntival autografts after pterigium excision. Ophtalmology 2005; 112: 667-671. (Pubitemid 41108869)
10. 10. Baharl, Weinberger D, Dan G. Pterygium surgery: fibrin glue versus vicryl sutures for conjuntival closure. Cornea 2006; 25:1168-1172. (Pubitemid 46005854)
11. Marticorena J, Rodriguez Ares MT, Taurino R. Pterygium surgery: conjuntival autograft using a fibrin adhesive. Cornea 2006; 25: 34-36. (Pubitemid 43031146)
12. Assia E. Surgical management of pterygium. Isr Med Assoc J 2002; 4:1138-1139.
13. Korangy G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. Cut and paste: a no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 911-914.
14. Korangy G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. The cut and paste method for primary surgery: long- term follow- up. Acta Opthalmol Scand 2005; 83: 298-301.