Erratum: The Circulate architecture: Avoiding workflow bottlenecks caused by centralised orchestration (Cluster Comput (2009) vol. 12 (237) 10.1007/s10586-009-0072-4));The Circulate architecture: Avoiding workflow bottlenecks caused by centralised orchestration

Cluster Computing

Volumn 12, Issue 2 SPEC. ISS., 2009, Pages 221-235

  Barker, Adam ^a   Weissman, Jon B ^b   van Hemert, Jano I ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decentralised orchestration; Web services; Workflow; Workflow optimisation

Indexed keywords

DATA TRANSFER; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ENGINES; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; WEBSITES;

COMMUNICATION OVERHEADS; DECENTRALISED; NETWORK CONFIGURATION; OPTIMISATIONS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE BENEFITS; SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION; WORKFLOW;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 68949207350     PISSN: 13867857     EISSN: 15737543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-009-0083-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. Abu-Ghazaleh, N., Lewis, M.J., Govindaraju, M.: Differential serialization for optimized SOAP performance. In: Proceedings of HPDC, June 2004
2. Apache Axis: http://ws.apache.org/axis (2008). Accessed 16 December 2008
3. Barker, A., vanAHemert, J.: Scientific workflow: a survey and research directions. In: Wyrzykowski, R., et al. (eds.) Seventh International Conference on Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, Revised Selected Papers. LNCS, vol. 4967, pp. 746-753. Springer, Berlin (2008)
4. Barros, A., Dumas, M., Oaks, P.: A critical overview of the Web services choreography description language (WS-CDL). BPTrends Newsletter 3 (2005)
5. Binder, W., Constantinescu, I., Faltings, B.: Decentralized orchestration of composite Web services. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Services, ICWS'06, pp. 869-876. IEEE Comput. Soc., Los Alamitos (2006)
6. Chiu, K., Govindaraju, M., Bramley, R.: Investigating the limits of SOAP performance for scientic computing. In: Proccesings of the 11th International Symposium on High Performance Distributing Computing (HPDC), July 2002
7. DeckeE, G., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Weske, M.: BPEL4Chor: extending BPEL for modeling choreographies. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2007 International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007), pp. 296-303 (2007)
8. Deelman, E., Singh, G., Su, M.-H., Blythe, J., Gil, A., Kesselman, C., Mehta, G., Vahi, K., Berriman, G.B., Good, J., Laity, A., Jacob, J.C., KatA, D.S.: Pegasus: a framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems. Sci. Programm. J. 13(3), 219-237 (2005)
9. Devaram, K., Andresen, D.: Differential serialization for optimized SOAP performance. In: Proceedings of PDCS, November 2003
10. Fredlund, L.: Implementing WS-CDL. In: Proceedings of the Second Spanish Workshop on Web Technologies (JSWEB 2006) (2006)
11. Grimshaw, A.S., Weissman, J.B., Strayer, W.T.: Portable run-time support for dynamic object-oriented parallel processing. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 14(2), 137-170 (1996)
12. Jacob, J.C., Katz, D.S., et. al.: The Montage architecture for grid-enabled science processing of large, distributed datasets. In: Proceedings of the Earth Science Technology Conference, June 2004
13. Karasavvas, K., Antonioletti, M., Atkinson, M., Hong, N.C., Sugden, T., Hume, A., Jackson, M., Krause, A., Palansuriya, C.: Introduction to OGSA-DAI Services. LNCS, vol. 3458, pp. 1-12. Springer, Berlin (2005)
14. Kavantzas, N., Burdett, D., Ritzinger, G., Lafon, Y.: Web services choreography description language (WS-CDL) Version 1.0. W3C Candidate Recommendation (2005)
15. Arishnan, S., Wagstrom, P., von Laszewski, G.: GSFL: a workflow framework for grid services. Technical Report, Argonne National Laboratory (2002)
16. Liu, D., Law, K.H., Wiederhold, G.: Analysis of integration models of service composition. In: Proceedings of Third International Workshop on Software and Performance, pp. 1058-165. ACM, New York (2002)
17. Liu, D., Law, K.H., Wiederhold, G.: Data-flow distribution in FICAS service composition infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing Systems (2002)
18. Ludascher, B., et al.: Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system. Concurr. Comput., Pract. Exper. 18(10), 1039-1065 (2005)
19. Martin, D., Wutke, D., Leymann, F.: A novel approach to decentralized workflow enactment. In: EDOC '08. 12th International IEEE Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, pp. 127-136 (2008)
20. Oinn, T., Addis, M., Ferris, J., Marvin, D., Senger, M., Greenwood, M., CarAer, T., Glover, K., Pocock, M.R., Wipat, A., Li, P.: Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics 20, 3045-3054 (2004)
21. Planet Lab: http://www.planet-lab.org (2008). Accessed 16 December 2008
22. Taylor, I., Shields, M., Wang, I., Philp, R.: Distributed P2P computing within Triana: A galaxy visualization test case. In: 17th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2003), pp. 16-27. IEEE Comput. Soc., Los Alamitos (2003)
23. The OASIS Committee: Web services business process execution language (WS-BPEL) Version 2.0 (2007)
24. Wassermann, B., et al.: Sedna: A BPEL-based environment for visual scientific workflow modelling. In: Workflows for eScience-Scientific Workflows for Grids, December 2006
25. Zaha, JAM., Barros, A., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.: Let's dance: a language for service behavior modelling. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM Conferences (1). LNCS, vol. 4275, pp. 145-162. Springer, Berlin (2006)