Evaluation of optical performance of soft contact lenses in myopic correction;Avaliação da qualidade óptica de lentes de contato gelatinosas na correção de miopia

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Volumn 71, Issue 6 SUPP, 2009, Pages 37-41

  Dalcoll, Marcelo Weslley ^a   Alves, Mílton Ruiz ^a   Barreto Jr , Jackson ^a   de Souza Yamane, Iris ^a   Bechara, Samir ^a   Mukai, Adriana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Contact lenses; Contrast sensitivity; Eyeglasses; Myopia; Prospective studies; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; MALE; MYOPIA; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPECTACLES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EYEGLASSES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68949206296     PISSN: 00042749     EISSN: 16782925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492008000700008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Jiang H, Wang D, Yang L, Xie P, He JC. A comparison of wavefront aberrations in eyes wearing different types of contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83(10):769-74.
2. Lu F, Mao X, Qu J, Xu D, He JC. Monochromatic wavefront aberrations in the human eye with contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(2):135-41.
3. Maldonanado-Codina C, Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the clinical performance of hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(6):442-54.
4. Hill JF. Clinical comparison of the (polymacon) spin-cast hydrogel contact lens to the (polymacon) lathe-cut hydrogel lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980; 57(8):523-7.
5. Wachler BS, Phillips CL, Schanzilin DJ, Krueger RR. Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different contact lenses and spectacles. CLAO J. 1999;25(1):48-51
6. Bailey IL. Visual acuity. In: Benjamin WJ, editor. Borish's clinical refraction. Philadelphia: WS Saunders; 1998. p.179-241.
7. Urbano AP, Leal M, Urbano I. Princípios básicos da acuidade visual. In: Urbano AP, editor. Wavefront. Cirurgia personalizada. Rio de Janeiro: Cultura Médica, 2006. p.59-65.
8. Wolkstein M, Atkin A, Bodis-Wolmer I. Contrast sensitivity in retinal disease. Ophthalmology. 1980;87(11):1140-9.
9. Sekuler R, Owsley C, Berenberger R. Contrast sensitivity during provoked visual impairment in multiple sclerosis. Ophtalmic Physiolol Opt. 1986;6: 229-32.
10. Grey CP. Changes in contrast sensitivity when wearing low, medium, and high water content soft lenses. J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1986;9:21-5.
11. Grey CP. Changes in contrast sensitivity during the first hour of soft contact lens wears. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986;63(9):702-7.
12. Millodot M. Variation of visual acuity with contact lenses. A function of luminance. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969;82(4):461-5.
13. Millodot M. Variation of visual acuity with soft contact lenses: a function of luminance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1965;52(8):541-4.
14. Cox I, Holden BA. Soft contact lens-induced longitudinal spherical aberration and its effect on contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67(9):679-83.
15. Barreto J Jr, Netto MV, Cigna A, Bechara S, Kara-José N. Precision of higher order aberration repeatability with NIDEK OPD Scan retinoscopic aberrometry. J Refract Surg. 22(9 Suppl):S1037-40.
16. Barth B, Alves MR, Kara-José N. Desempenho visual na correção de miopia com óculos e lentes de contato gelatinosas. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;71(1):90-6.