Spatial cuing does not affect the magnitude of the attentional blink

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 989-993

  Ghorashi, Shahab ^a   Enns, James T ^a   Spalek, Thomas M ^b   Di Lollo, Vincent ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ATTENTIONAL BLINK; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CUES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 68949186313     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.5.989     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Colegate, R. L., Hoffman, J. E., & Eriksen, C. W. (1973). Selective encoding from multielement visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 217-224.
2. Dell'Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Jolicoeur, P., & Robitaille, N. (2006). Spatial attention freezes during the attention blink. Psychophysiology, 43, 394-400.
3. Di Lollo, V., Hogben, J. H., & Dixon, P. (1994). Temporal integration and segregation of brief visual stimuli: Patterns of correlation in time. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 373-386.
4. Ghorashi, S., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2008, November). Spatial orienting is not impaired during the attentional blink. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 49, 55.
5. Nieuwenstein, M. R., Chun, M. M., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Hooge, I. T. C. (2005). Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1463-1475.
6. Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2005). The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 16, 265-269.
7. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849-860.
8. Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual "cocktail party" effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 504-514.
9. Spalek, T. M., Falcon, L. J., & Di Lollo, V. (2006). Attentional blink and attentional capture: Endogenous versus exogenous control over paying attention to two important events in close succession. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 674-684.
10. Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 782-787.
11. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Wald, A. (1947). Sequential analysis. New York: Wiley.
13. Zhang, D., Shao, L., Nieuwenstein, M. [R.], & Zhou, X. (2008). Topdown control is not lost in the attentional blink: Evidence from intact endogenous cuing. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 287-295.