Identification of feigned ankle plantar and dorsiflexors weakness in normal subjects

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 774-781

  Olmo, Jesús ^a   Jato, Susana ^a   Benito, Jaime ^a   Martín, Ignacio ^b   Dvir, Zeevi ^c  

^a Fraternidad Muprespa Central Hospital   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Ankle; Deception; Disability evaluation; Isokinetics

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONCENTRIC MUSCLE CONTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECCENTRIC MUSCLE CONTRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TORQUE; VALIDITY; VELOCITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; DECEPTION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68949184635     PISSN: 10506411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abidi N.A. Sprains about the foot and ankle encountered in the workmans' compensation patient. Foot Ankle Clin 7 (2002) 305-322
2. Bennett J.G., and Stauber W.T. Evaluation and treatment of anterior knee pain using eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 18 (1986) 526-530
3. Birmingham T.B., and Kramer J.F. Identifying submaximal muscular effort: reliability of different scores calculated from isokinetic and isometric measurements. Percept Mot Skills 87 (1998) 1183-1191
4. Birmingham T.B., Kramer J.F., Speechley M., Chesworth B.M., and MacDermid J. Measurement variability and sincerity of effort: clinical utility of isokinetic coefficient of variation scores. Ergonomics 41 (1998) 853-863
5. Bohannon R.W. Differentiation of maximal from submaximal static elbow flexor efforts by measurement variability. Am J Sports Med 66 (1987) 213-217
6. Conti S.F., and Silverman L. Epidemiology of foot and ankle injuries in the workplace. Foot Ankle Clin 7 (2002) 273-290
7. David G., Dvir Z., Mackintosh S., and Brien C. Validity study of a novel protocol for the identification of submaximal effort. Isokinet Exerc Sci 6 (1996) 139-144
8. Dvir Z. An isokinetic study of submaximal effort in elbow flexion. Percept Mot Skills 84 (1997) 1431-1438
9. Dvir Z. Differentiation of submaximal from maximal trunk extension effort: an isokinetic study using a new testing protocol. Spine 22 (1997) 2672-2676
10. Dvir Z. Coefficient of variation in maximal and feigned static and dynamic grip effort. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78 (1999) 216-221
11. Dvir Z. Identification of feigned grip effort using isokinetic dynamometry. Clin Biomech 14 (1999) 522-527
12. Dvir Z. Isokinetics: muscle testing, interpretation, and clinical applications. 2nd ed. (2004), Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
13. Dvir Z., and David G. Suboptimal muscular performance: measuring isokinetic strength of knee extensors with new testing protocol. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 (1996) 578-581
14. Dvir Z., and Keating J. Identification of feigned isokinetic trunk extension effort in normal subjects: an efficiency study of the DEC. Spine 26 (2001) 1046-1051
15. Dvir Z., and Keating J. Trunk extension strength and validation of trunk extension effort in chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine 28 (2003) 685-692
16. Dvir Z., Steinfeld-Cohen Y., and Peretz C. Identification of feigned shoulder flexion weakness in normal subjects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81 (2002) 187-193
17. Enoka R.M. Eccentric contractions require unique activation strategies by the nervous system. J Appl Physiol 81 (1996) 2339-2346
18. Fang Y., Siemionow V., Sahgal V., Xiong F., and Yue G.H. Distinct brain activation patterns for human maximal voluntary eccentric and concentric muscle actions. Brain Res 1023 (2004) 200-212
19. Finsterbush A., Frankel V., and Arnon R. Quantitative power measurements of extensor hallucis longus: a simple objective test in evaluation of low back pain with neurological involvement. Spine 8 (1983) 206-210
20. Fishbain D.A., Abdel-Moty E., Cutler R., Rosomoff H.L., and Rosomoff R.S. Detection of 'faked' strength task effort in volunteers using a computerized exercise testing system. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78 (1999) 222-227
21. Fishbain D.A., Cutler R., Rosomoff H.L., and Rosomoff R.S. Chronic pain disability exaggeration/malingering and submaximal effort research. Clin J Pain 15 (1999) 244-274
22. Grimm D.J., and Fallat L. Injuries of the foot and ankle in occupational medicine: a 1-year study. J Foot Ankle Surg 38 (1999) 102-108
23. Hamilton A., Balnave R., and Adams R. Variability of grip strength during isometric contractions. Ergonomics 38 (1995) 1819-1830
24. Hamilton A., Balnave R., and Adams R. Review of sincerity of effort testing. Safety Sci 25 (1997) 237-245
25. Harper J.D. Determining foot and ankle impairments by the AMA fifth edition guides. Foot Ankle Clin 7 (2002) 291-303
26. Hazard R.G., Reid S., Fenwick J., and Reeves V. Isokinetic trunk and lifting strength measurements: variability as an indicator of effort. Spine 13 (1988) 54-57
27. Hill A.V. The mechanics of active muscle. Proc Royal Soc 141 (1953) 104-117
28. Hiraoka K., and Abe K. Cortical and spinal control of ankle joint muscles before and during gait initiation. Somatosens Mot Res 4 (2007) 1-7
29. Holmbäck M.M., Porter M.M., Downham D., and Lexell J. Reliability of isokinetic ankle dorsiflexor strength measurements in healthy young men and women. J Rehab Med 31 (1999) 229-239
30. Janda D.H., Geiringer S.R., Hankin F.M., and Barry D.T. Objective evaluation of grip strength. J Occup Med 29 (1987) 569-571
31. Karnofel H., Wilkinson K., and Lentell G. Reliability of isokinetic muscle testing at the ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 11 (1989) 150-154
32. Lin P., Robinson M.E., Carlos J., and O'Connor P. Detection of submaximal effort in isometric and isokinetic knee extension tests. J Orthop Phys Ther 24 (1996) 19-24
33. Luoto S., Hupli M., Alaranta H., and Hurri H. Isokinetic performance capacity of trunk muscles: Part II. Coefficient of variation in isokinetic measurements in maximal effort and submaximal effort. Scand J Rehabil Med 28 (1996) 207-210
34. Muraoka T., Muramatsu T., Takeshita D., Kanehisa H., and Fukunaga T. Estimation of passive ankle joint moment during standing and walking. J Appl Biomech 21 (2005) 72-84
35. Newton M., Thow M., Somerville D., Henderson I., and Waddell G. Trunk strength testing with iso-machines. Part II: experimental evaluation of the Cybex II back testing system in normal subjects and patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 18 (1993) 812-824
36. Niebuhr B.R., and Marion R. Detecting sincerity of effort when measuring grip strength. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 66 (1987) 16-24
37. Nielsen J.B., and Sinkjaer T. Afferent feedback in the control of human gait. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12 (2002) 213-217
38. Simmonsen J.C. Coefficient of variation as a measure of subject effort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 (1995) 516-520
39. Stokes H.M. The seriously uninjured hand-weakness of grip. J Occup Med 25 (1983) 683-686
40. Sutherland D.H., Cooper L., and Daniel D. The role of the ankle plantar flexors in normal walking. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62 (1980) 354-363
41. Timm K.E., and Fyke D. The effect of test speed sequence on the concentric isokinetic performance of the knee extensor muscle group. Isok Exerc Sci 3 (1993) 123-128