The role of f0 and formant frequencies in distinguishing the voices of men and women

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1150-1166

  Hillenbrand, James M ^a   Clark, Michael J ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 68949183185     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1150     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1975). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in vowel judgments. In G. Fant & M. A. A. Tatham (Eds.), Auditory analysis and the perception of speech (pp. 103-113). London: Academic Press.
2. Assmann, P. F., & Nearey, T. M. (2003a). Frequency shifts and vowel identification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1397-1400). Barcelona.
3. Assmann, P. F., & Nearey, T. M. (2003b). A review of results on frequency shifts and vowel identification. Canadian Acoustics, 31, 18-19.
4. Assmann, P. F., & Nearey, T. M. (2007). Relationship between fundamental and formant frequencies in voice preference. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, EL35-EL43. Retrieved May 8, 2009, from http://scitation.aip.org/journals/doc/JASMAN-ft/vol_122/iss_2/EL35_1.html. doi:10.1121/1.2719045
5. Assmann, P. F., Nearey, T. M., & Dembling, S. (2006). Effects of frequency shifts on perceived naturalness and gender information in speech. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 889-892). Pittsburgh.
6. Assmann, P. F., Nearey, T. M., & Scott, J. M. (2002). Modeling the perception of frequency-shifted vowels. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 425-428). Denver.
7. Bachorowski, J.-A., & Owren, M. J. (1999). Acoustic correlates of talker sex and individual talker identity are present in a short vowel segment produced in running speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1054-1063.
8. Bennett, S., & Montero-Diaz, L. (1982). Children's perception of speaker sex. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 113-121.
9. Bladon, R. A. W. (1982). Arguments against formants in the auditory representation of speech. In R. Carlson & B. Granstrom (Eds.), The representation of speech in the peripheral auditory system (pp. 95-102). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Bladon, R. A. W., & Lindblom, B. (1981). Modeling the judgment of vowel quality differences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 1414-1422.
11. Childers, D. G., & Wu, K. (1991). Gender recognition from speech: Part II: Coarse analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1828-1840.
12. Chistovich, L. A., & Lublinskaja, V. V. (1979). The "center of gravity" effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between formants: Psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli. Hearing Research, 1, 185-195.
13. Coleman, R. O. (1971). Male and female voice quality and its relationship to vowel formant frequencies. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 14, 565-577.
14. Coleman, R. O. (1976). A comparison of the contributions of two voice quality characteristics to the perception of maleness and femaleness in the voice. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 19, 168-180. doi:10.1121/1.424675
15. de Cheveigné, A., & Kawahara, H. (1999). A missing-data model of vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 3497-3508.
16. Disner, S. F. (1980). Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 253-261.
17. Eklund, I., & Traunmüller, H. (1997). Comparative study of male and female whispered and phonated versions of the long vowels of Swedish. Phonetica, 54, 1-21.
18. Fant, G. (1975). Non-uniform vowel normalization. Speech Transmission Laboratories-Quarterly Progress & Status Report, 2-3, 1-19.
19. Fellowes, J. M., Remez, R. E., & Rubin, P. E. (1997). Perceiving the sex and identity of a talker without natural vocal timbre. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 839-849.
20. Fitch, J. L., & Holbrook, A. (1970). Modal vocal fundamental frequency of young adults. Archives of Otolaryngology, 92, 379-382.
21. Fujisaki, H., & Kawashima, T. (1968). The roles of pitch and higher formants in the perception of vowels. IEEE Transactions on Audio & Electroacoustics, 16, 73-77.
22. Graddol, D., & Swann, J. (1983). Speaking fundamental frequency: Some physical and social correlates. Language & Speech, 26, 351-366.
23. Henton, C. G. (1989). Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch. Language & Communication, 9, 299-311.
24. Hillenbrand, J. M., & Gayvert, R. A. (1993). Vowel classification based on fundamental frequency and formant frequencies. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 694-700.
25. Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099-3111.
26. Hillenbrand, J. M., & Houde, R. A. (2003). A narrow band pattern-matching model of vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1044-1055.
27. Hillenbrand, J. M., Houde, R. A., & Gayvert, R. A. (2006). Speech perception based on spectral peaks versus spectral shape. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 4041-4054.
28. Hillenbrand, J. M., & Nearey, T. M. (1999). Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: Effects of formant contour. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 3509-3523.
29. House, A. S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 105-113.
30. Hudson, A. I., & Holbrook, A. (1981). A study of the reading fundamental vocal frequency of young black adults. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 24, 197-200.
31. Ingemann, F. (1968). Identification of the speaker's sex from voiceless fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1142-1144.
32. Ito, M., Tsuchida, J., & Yano, M. (2001). On the effectiveness of whole spectral shape for vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1141-1149.
33. 0 extraction: Possible role of repetitive structure in sounds. Speech Communication, 27, 187-207.
34. Klatt, D. H. (1982). Speech processing strategies based on auditory models. In R. Carlson & B. Granstrom (Eds.), The representation of speech in the peripheral auditory system (pp. 181-196). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820-857.
36. Lass, N. J., Hughes, K. R., Bowyer, M. D., Waters, L. T., & Bourne, V. T. (1976). Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 675-678.
37. Miller, J. D. (1989). Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2114-2134.
38. Miller, R. L. (1953). Auditory tests with synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 114-121.
39. Nearey, T. M. (1978). Phonetic feature systems for vowels. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
40. Nearey, T. M. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2088-2113.
41. Nearey, T. M., Hogan, J. T., & Rozsypal, A. J. (1979). Speech signals, cues, and features. In G. D. Prideaux (Ed.), Perspectives in experimental linguistics (pp. 73-96). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42. Owren, M. J., Berkowitz, M., & Bachorowski, J.-A. (2007). Listeners judge talker sex more efficiently from male than from female vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 930-941.
43. Paul, D. B. (1981). The spectral envelope estimation vocoder. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing, 29, 786-794.
44. Peterson, G., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175-184.
45. Potter, R. K., & Steinberg, J. C. (1950). Toward the specification of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 807-820.
46. Remez, R. E., & Rubin, P. E. (1984). On the perception of intonation from sinusoidal sentences. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 429-440.
47. Remez, R. E., & Rubin, P. E. (1993). On the intonation of sinusoidal sentences: Contour and pitch height. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1983-1988.
48. Schwartz, M. F., & Rine, H. E. (1968). Identification of speaker sex from isolated, whispered vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1736-1737.
49. Slawson, A. W. (1968). Vowel quality and musical timbre as functions of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 87-101.
50. Smith, D. R. R., & Patterson, R. D. (2005). The interaction of glottalpulse rate and vocal-tract length in judgements of speaker size, sex, and age. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3177-3186.
51. Smith, D. R. R., Walters, T. C., & Patterson, R. D. (2007). Discrimination of speaker sex and size when glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length are controlled, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 3628-3639.
52. Stoicheff, M. L. (1981). Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of nonsmoking female adults. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 24, 437-441.
53. Syrdal, A. K., & Gopal, H. S. (1986). A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 1086-1100.
54. Titze, I. R. (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1699-1707.
55. Traunmüller, H. (1984). Articulatory and perceptual factors controlling the age- and sex-conditioned variability in formant frequencies of vowels. Speech Communication, 3, 49-61.
56. Traunmüller, H. (1988). Paralinguistic variation and invariance in the characteristic frequencies of vowels. Phonetica, 45, 1-29.
57. Whiteside, S. P. (1998). The identification of a speaker's sex from synthesized vowels. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 87, 595-600.
58. Zahorian, S. A., & Jagharghi, A. J. (1993). Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1966-1982.
59. Zue, V. W., Seneff, S., & Glass, J. (1990). Speech database development at MIT: TIMIT and beyond. Speech Communication, 9, 351-356.