Comparison of sequential indicator simulation and transition probability indicator simulation used to model clay content in microscale surface soil

Soil Science

Volumn 174, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 395-402

  He, Yong ^a,b   Hu, Kelin ^a   Li, Baoguo ^a   Chen, Deli ^b   Suter, Helen Charlotte ^b   Huang, Yuanfang ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

And stochastic simulation; Soil clay content; Spatial distribution; Transition probability Geostatistics

Indexed keywords

CLAY SOIL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ACQUISITION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GEOSTATISTICS; GRAIN SIZE; HISTOGRAM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; STOCHASTICITY; VARIOGRAM;

EID: 68949178689     PISSN: 0038075X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3181aea77c     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bagheri, F., M. Bybordi, and H. A. Bahrami. 2005. Estimation of available water capacity in clay soil by using pedo-transfer functions. J. Agric. Sci. 1(6): 1-8.
2. Bastante, F. G., C. Ordóñez, J. Taboada, and J. M. Mat?́as. 2008. Comparison of indicator kriging, conditional indicator simulation and multiple-point statistics used to model slate deposits. Eng. Geol. 98:50-59.
3. Carle, S. F. 1996. A Transition Probability-Based Approach to Geostatistical Characterization of Hydrostratigraphic Architecture. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis, CA.
4. Carle, S. F., and G. E. Fogg. 1996. Transition probabilityYbased indicator geostatistics. Math Geol. 28(4):453-476.
5. Carle, S. F., and G. E. Fogg. 1997. Modeling spatial variability with one-and multi-dimensional continuous Markov chain. Math. Geol. 29(7): 891-918.
6. Deutsch, C. V 2006. A sequential indicator simulation program for categorical variables with point and block data: BlockSIS. Comput. Geosci. 32:1669-1681.
7. Esbensen, K. H., H. H. Friis-Petersen, and L. Petersen, et al. 2007. Representative process samplingVin practice: Variographic analysis and estimation of total sampling errors (TSE). Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 88:41-59.
8. Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
9. Goovaerts, P. 1999. Impact of the simulation algorithm, magnitude of ergodic fluctuations and number of realizations on the spaces of uncertainty of flow properties. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 13(3):161-182.
10. Goovaerts, P. 2000. Estimation or simulation of soil properties? An optimization problem with conflicting criteria. Geoderma 97:165-186.
11. Hengl, T., N. Toomanian, H. I. Reuter, and M. J. Malakouti. 2007. Methods to interpolate soil categorical variables from profile observations: Lessons from Iran. Geoderma 140:417-427.
12. Isaaks, E. H., and R. M. Srivastava. 1989. Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
13. Kjaergaard, C., L. W. de. Jonge, and P. Moldrup. 2002. Effect of clay content and soil-water potential on mobilization and leaching of colloids in unsat-urated macroporous soil. DIAS Report. Plant Production 80:113-121.
14. Lee, S. Y., S. F. Carle, and G. E. Fogg. 2007. Geologic heterogeneity and a comparison of two geostatistical models: Sequential Gaussian and transition probability-based geostatistical simulation. Adv. Water Resour. 30:1914-1932.
15. Li, W. D. 2006. Transiogram: A spatial relationship measure for categorical data. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 20(6):693-699.
16. Li, W. D., B. G. Li, and Y C. Shi. 1999. Markov chain simulation of soil textural layers. Geoderma 92:37-53.
17. Li, W. D., and C. R. Zhang. 2006. A generalized Markov chain approach for conditional simulation of categorical variables from grid samples. Trans. GIS 10(4):651-669.
18. Li, W. D., C. R. Zhang, J. E. Burt, and A. X. Zhu. 1997. Application of the Markov chain theory to describe spatial distribution of soil textural layers. Soil Sci. 162:672-683.
19. Li, W. D. 2007. Transiograms for characterizing spatial variability of soil classes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71(3):881-893.
20. Wang, W. J., R. C. Dalal, P. W. Moody, and C. J. Smith. 2003. Relationships of soil respiration to microbial biomass, substrate availability and clay content. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35(2):273-284.
21. Webster, R. 1985. Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. Adv. Soil Sci. 3:1-70.
22. Weigand, H., K. U. Totsche, B. Huwe, and I. Kogel-Knabner. 2001. PAH mobility in contaminated industrial: A Markov chain approach to the spatial variability of soil properties and PAH levels. Geoderma 102:371-389.
23. Weissmann, G. S., and G. E. Fogg. 1999. Multi-scale alluvial fan heterogeneity modeled with transition probability geostatistics in a sequence stratigraphic framework. J. Hydrology 226:48-65.
24. Wetterlind, J., B. Stenberg, and A. Jonsson. 2008. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy compared with soil clay and organic matter content for estimating within-field variation in N uptake in cereals. Plant Soil 302(1-2):3 17-327.
25. Woodcock, C. E., A. H. Strahler, and D. L. B. Jupp. 1988. The use of variograms in remote sensing: II. Real digital images. Remote Sens. Environ. 25:349-379.
26. Wu, K., N. Nunan, J. W Crawford, L. M. Young, and K. Ritz. 2004. An efficient Markov chain model for the simulation of heterogeneous soil structure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:346-351.
27. Zhang, C., and W D. Li. 2008. Regional-scale modelling of the spatial distribution of surface and subsurface textural classes in alluvial soils using Markov chain geostatistics. Soil Use Manag. 24:263-272.