Web-based image norming: How do object familiarity and visual complexity ratings compare when collected in-lab versus online?

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 699-704

  Paré, Dwayne E ^a   Cree, George S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; INTERNET; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 68949177230     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.699     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Acredolo, L. P. (1979). Laboratory versus home: The effect of environment on the 9-month-old infant's choice of spatial reference system. Developmental Psychology, 15, 666-667. Doi:10.1037/0012-1649.15.6.666
2. Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803-832. Doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601
3. Buchanan, T. (1998-1999). Using the World Wide Web for formative assessment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27, 71-79. Doi:10.2190/167K-BQHU-UGGF-HX75
4. Ceci, S. J., & Bronfenbrenner, U. (1985). "Don't forget to take the cup-cakes out of the oven": Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Development, 56, 152-164. Doi:10.2307/1130182
5. Dandurand, F., Shultz, T. R., & Onishi, K. H. (2008). Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 428-434. Doi:10.3758/BRM.40.2.428
6. Huang, H.-M. (2006). Do print and Web surveys provide the same results? Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 334-350.
7. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340. Doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306
8. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135. Doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126
9. Joordens, S., & Merikle, P. M. (1992). False recognition and perception without awareness. Memory & Cognition, 20, 151-159.
10. Krantz, J. H., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of Web-based psychological research. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 35-60). San Diego: Academic Press.
11. McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., & Williams, J. E. (2000). The integrity of Web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11, 502-506. Doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00296
12. Metzger, M. M., Kristof, V. L., & Yoest, D. J., Jr. (2003). The World Wide Web and the laboratory: A comparison using face recognition. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 6, 613-621. Doi:10.1089/109493103322725388
13. Musch, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2002). Psychological experimenting on the World Wide Web: Investigating content effects in syllogistic reasoning. In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips, & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Online social sciences (pp. 181-212). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
14. Reimers, S., & Stewart, N. (2007). Adobe Flash as a medium for online experimentation: A test of reaction time measurement capabilities. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 365-370.
15. Reips, U.-D. (2000). The Web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 89-117). San Diego: Academic Press.
16. Stern, S. E., & Faber, J. E. (1997). The lost e-mail method: Milgram's lost-letter technique in the age of the Internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 260-263.
17. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1235-1253. Doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235
18. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 547-565. Doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.547
19. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3-13. Doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.3
20. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 14-33. Doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.14