A mixed-effects expectancy-valence model for the Iowa gambling task

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 657-663

  Cheng, Chung Ping ^a   Sheu, Ching Fan ^b   Yen, Nai Shing ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 68949169319     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.657     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
2. Bechara, A., & Damasio, H. (2002). Decision-making and addiction (Part I): Impaired activation of somatic states in substance-dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1675-1689.
3. Boeka, A. G., & Lokken, K. L. (2006). The Iowa gambling task as a measure of decision making for women with bulimia nervosa. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 741-745. doi:10.10170S1355617706060887
4. Bolla, K. I., Eldreth, D. A., Matochik, J. A., & Cadet, J. L. (2004). Sex-related differences in a gambling task and its neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1226-1232. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh083
5. Busemeyer, J. R., & Stout, J. C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 14, 252-262.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Davis, C., Patte, K., Tweed, S., & Curtis, C. (2007). Personality traits associated with decision-making deficits. Personality & Individual Differences, 42, 279-290. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.006
8. Hoffman, L., & Rovine, M. J. (2007). Multilevel models for experimental psychologists: Foundations and illustrative examples. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 101-117.
9. Isella, V., Mapelli, C., Morieli, N., Pelati, O., Franceschi, M., & Appollonio, I. M. (2008). Age-related qualitative and quantitative changes in decision making ability. Behavioral Neurology, 19, 59-63.
10. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
11. O'Neill, R. (1971). Algorithm AS 47: Function minimization using a simplex procedure. Applied Statistics, 20, 338-345.
12. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (1995). Approximations to the log-likelihood function in the nonlinear mixed-effects model. Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics, 4, 12-35.
13. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects model in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer.
14. misctextR Development Core Team/misctext (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software and manual]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
15. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803-814.
16. Rouder, J. N., Lu, J., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., & Jiang, Y. (2005). A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions. Psy-chonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 195-223.
17. SAS Institute, Inc. (2004). SAS/STAT user's guide (Version 9.1). Cary, NC: Author.
18. Sheu, C.-F., Chen, C.-T., Su, Y.-H., & Wang, W.-C. (2005). Using SAS PROC NLMIXED to fit item response theory models. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 202-218.
19. Sheu, C.-F., Lee, Y.-H., & Shih, P.-Y. (2008). Analyzing recognition performance with sparse data. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 722-727.
20. Stockard, J., O'Brien, R. M., & Peters, E. (2007). The use of mixed models in a modified Iowa gambling task and a prisoner's dilemma game. Judgment & Decision Making, 2, 9-22.
21. Stout, J. C., Busemeyer, J. R., Lin, A., Grant, S. J., & Bonson, K. R. (2004). Cognitive modeling analysis of the decision-making processes used by cocaine abusers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 742-747.
22. van den Bos, R., Lasthuis, W., den Heijer, E., van der Harst, J., & Spruijt, B. (2006). Toward a rodent model of the Iowa gambling task. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 470-478.
23. Verdejo-Garcia, A., Benbrook, A., Funderburk, F., David, P., Cadet, J. L., & Bolla, K. I. (2007). The differential relationship between cocaine use and marijuana use on decision-making performance over repeat testing with the Iowa gambling task. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 90, 2-11. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.004
24. Wetzels, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008, July). Bayesian parameter estimation in the expectancy valence model of the Iowa gambling task. Paper presented at the 41st Mathematical Psychology Meeting, Washington, DC.
25. Wolfinger, R. D. (1999). Fitting nonlinear mixed models with the new NLMIXED procedure. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual SAS Groups International Conference (SUGI24) (Paper 287). Gary, NC: SAS Institute.
26. Yechiam, E., Busemeyer, J. R., Stout, J. C., & Bechara, A. (2005). Using cognitive models to map relations between neuropsychological disorders and human decision making deficits. Psychological Science, 16, 973-978. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01646.x