Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: A randomised controlled trial

British Dental Journal

Volumn 207, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Sakai, V T ^a   Moretti, A B S ^b   Oliveira, T M ^a   Fornetti, A P C ^a   Santos, C F ^a   MacHado, M A A M ^a   Abdo, R C C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ALFENAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM DERIVATIVE; GLASS IONOMER; IRM CEMENT; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE; OXIDE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SILICATE; TOOTH CEMENT; VITREMER; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALUMINUM COMPOUNDS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN, SECONDARY; DRUG COMBINATIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; METHYLMETHACRYLATES; MOLAR; OXIDES; PULPOTOMY; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RESIN CEMENTS; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; SILICATES; TOOTH EXFOLIATION; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 68949150772     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.665     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agamy H A, Bakry N S, Mounir M M, Avery D R. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 302-309.
2. Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks A B. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 15-18.
3. Fuks A B. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2002; 3: 115-120.
4. Huth K C, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N et al. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques - randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 1144-1148.
5. Jabbarifar S E, Khademi A A, Ghasemi D. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy versus mineral trioxide aggregate in human primary molar tooth. J Res Med Sci 2004; 6: 55-58.
6. Maroto M, Barberia E, Planells P, Garcia Godoy F. Dentin bridge formation after mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomies in primary teeth. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 151-154.
7. Ranly D, García-Godoy F. Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. J Dent 2000; 28: 153-161.
8. Barrieshi-Nusair K M, Qudeimat M A. A prospective clinical study of mineral trioxide aggregate for partial pulpotomy in cariously exposed permanent teeth. J Endod 2006; 32: 731-735.
9. Camilleri J, Pitt Ford T R. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of the constituents and biological properties of the material. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 747-754.
10. Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, Mushayt A. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005; 29: 307-312.
11. Moretti A B S, Oliveira T M, Sakai V T, Santos C F, Machado M A A M, Abdo R C C. Mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy of a primary second molar in a patient with agenesis of the permanent successor. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 78-745.
12. Moretti A B, Sakai V T, Oliveira T M et al. Effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 547-555.
13. Roberts H W, Toth J M, Berzins C W, Charlton D G. Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of literature. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 149-164.
14. Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25: 197-205.
15. Chacko V, Kukirose S. Human pulpal response to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): a histologic study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2006; 30: 203-210.
16. Holland R, de Souza V, Murata S S et al. Healing process of dog dental pulp after pulpotomy and pulp covering with mineral trioxide aggregate or Portland cement. Braz Dent J 2001; 12: 109-113.
17. Menezes R, Bramante C M, Letra A, Carvalho V G G, Garcia R B. Histologic evaluation of pulpotomies in dog using two types of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cements as wound dressings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98: 376-379.
18. Aeinehchi M, Dadvand S, Fayazi S, Bayat-Movahed S. Randomized controlled trial of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 261-267.
19. Bortoluzzi E A, Broon N J, Bramante C M, Garcia R B, Moraes I G, Bernardineli N. Sealing ability of MTA and radiopaque Portland cement with or without calcium chloride for root-end fi lling. J Endod 2006; 32: 897-900.
20. Danesh G, Dammaschke T, Gerth H U V, Zndbiglari T, Schafer E. A comparative study of selected properties of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and two Portland cements. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 213-219.
21. De-Deus G, Petruccelli V, Gurgel-Filho E, Coutinho-Filho T. MTA versus Portland cement as repair material for furcal perforations: a laboratory study using polymicrobial leakage model. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 293-298.
22. Estrela C, Bammann L L, Estrela C R A, Silva R S, Pécora J D. Antimicrobial and chemical study of MTA, Portland cement, calcium hydroxide paste, Sealapex and Dycal. Braz Dent J 2000; 11: 19-27.
23. Islam I, Chng H K, Yap A U J. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and Portland cement. J Endod 2006; 32: 193-197.
24. Wucherpfenning A L, Green D B. Mineral trioxide vs Portland cement: two biocompatible fi lling materials. J Endod 1999; 25: 308.
25. Coomaraswamy K S, Lumley P J, Hofmann M P. Effect of bismuth oxide radioopacifi er content on the material properties of an endodontic Portland cementbased (MTA-like) system. J Endod 2007; 33: 295-298.
26. Song J S, Mante F K, Romanow W J, Kim S. Chemical analysis of powder and set forms of Portland cement, gray ProRoot MTA, white ProRoot MTA, and gray MTA-Angelus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 809-815.
27. Min K S, Kim H I, Park H J, Pi S H, Hong C U, Kim E C. Human pulp cells response to Portland cement in vitro. J Endod 2007; 33: 163-166.
28. De-Deus G, Coutinho Filho T. The use of white Portland cement as an apical plug in a tooth with a necrotic pulp and wide-open apex: a case report. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 653-660.
29. Conti T R, Sakai V T, Fornetti A P et al. Pulpotomies with portland cement in human primary molars. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 66-69.
30. Duarte M A H, Demarchi A C C O, Yamashita J C, Kuga M C, Fraga S C. Arsenic release provided by MTA and Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 648-650.
31. Saidon J, He J, Zhu Q, Safavi K, Spangberg L. Cell and tissue reactions to mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95: 483-489.
32. Spangberg L S W. Response to letter to the editor by Carolyn M. Prismus, PhD. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101: 418.
33. Nair P N, Duncan H F, Pitt Ford T R, Luder H U. Histological, ultrastructural and quantitative investigations on the response of healthy human pulps to experimental capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 128-150.
34. Waterhouse P J, Nunn J H, Whitworth J M, Soames J V. Primary molar pulp therapy - histological evaluation of failure. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000; 10: 313-321.
35. Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks A B. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27: 129-136.
36. Hewlett E R, Mount G J. Glass ionomers in contemporary restorative dentistry - a clinical update. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31: 483-492.