Assessment of the basic parameters of the CERN Superconducting Proton Linac

Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2009, Pages

  Brunner, O ^a   Calatroni, S ^a   Ciapala, E ^a   Eshraqi, M ^a,b   Garoby, R ^a   Gerigk, F ^a   Lombardi, A ^a   Losito, R ^a   Parma, V ^a   Rossi, C ^a   Tuckmantel, J ^a   Vretenar, M ^a   Wagner, U ^a   Weingarten, W ^a  

^a CERN   (Switzerland)

^b INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES IPM   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68949147864     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10984402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.070402     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. R. Garoby and M. Vretenar, PS/RF/Note 96-27.
2. M. Vretenar, CERN Report No. CERN-2000-012, http://doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/ 2000/2000-012/p1.pdf.
3. F. Gerigk, CERN Report No. CERN-2006-006, http://doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/ 2006/2006-006/full-document.pdf.
4. R. Garoby, CERN Report No. CERN-AB-2007-074 PAF, http://doc.cern.ch/ archive/electronic/cern/preprints/ab/ab-2007-074.pdf.
5. R. Garoby and F. Gerigk, CERN Report No. CERN-AB-2007-016 RF, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1035211/files/ab-2007-016.pdf.
6. M. Benedikt, CERN Report No. CERN 2007-002, p. 117, http://doc.cern.ch// archive/cernrep/2007/2007-002/p117.pdf.
7. F. Gerigk, and, M. Vretenar, Linac4 Technical Design Report, CERN-AB-2006-084 ABP/RF, http://doc.cern.ch/archive/electronic/cern/preprints/ ab/ab-2006-084.pdf.
8. Status of SPL rf Frequency and Cooling Temperature, CERN, 2008, http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=32631.
9. Eurisol Design Study: http://www.eurisol.org/site01/index.php.
10. P. Zucchelli, Phys. Lett. B 532, 166 (2002). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01576-9
11. J.E. Campagne and A. Caze, CERN-NUFACT-NOTE 142, 2004, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/806547.
12. The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory, https://www.ids-nf.org/wiki/FrontPage.
13. F. Gerigk and R. Garoby, in Proceedings of the 39th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on High Intensity High Brightness Hadron Beams, 2006 (CERN CERN-AB-2006-020, 2006), http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/961205.
14. R. Garoby, M. Benedikt, A. Fabich, and F. Gerigk, CERN Report No. CERN-AB-2007-014, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1029954.
15. E. Noah, EURISOL Target Stations Operation and Implications for its Proton Linac Driver Beam, EPAC06, Edinburgh, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/ 971892.
16. M. Aiba, CERN Report No. CERN-AB-2008-060, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/ 1125556.
17. M. Bonesini, Particle Production vs Energy, NuFact08, Valencia.
18. R. Duperrier, N. Pichoff, and D. Uriot, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science: ICCS 2002, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002).
19. A. Perrin and J.F. Amand, Travel v4.06, User's Manual, CERN (2003).
20. R. Duperrier, N. Pichoff, and D. Uriot, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10, 084201 (2007). PRABFM 1098-4402 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.10.084201
21. W. Weingarten, CERN Report No. CERN-AB-2008-063, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/ record/1132351.
22. D.C. Mattis and J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 111, 412 (1958). 10.1103/PhysRev.111.412
23. The theoretical magnetic field limit for a perfect superconducting surface is the superheating field Bsh, beyond which magnetic flux will enter into the superconductor. Real surfaces of type II superconductors will allow flux entry already at the lower critical field Bc1
24. This equation is strictly speaking only valid for T
25. DESY has demonstrated that the production yield for electropolished cavities is even larger than this number, which was obtained by essentially analyzing the test results of chemically polished cavities; cf..
26. A. Polyanskii, A. Squitieri, M. Jewell, P. Lee, A. Gurevich, D. Larbalestier, P. Bauer, C. Boffo, L. Bellantoni, and H. Edwards, in the 2005 Workshop on RF Superconductivity, Ithaca, NY.
27. C. Benvenuti, Physica (Amsterdam) 316C, 153 (1999). PHYCE6 0921-4534 10.1016/S0921-4534(99)00207-5
28. W. Weingarten, Part. Accel. PLACBD 0031-2460 53, 199 (1996), http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/296351.
29. Ph. Bernard, E. Chiaveri, and J. Tückmantel, " Technical and Financial Implications of the Frequency Choice for a SC Accelerator Section " (unpublished).
30. A. Lombardi (private communication).
31. E. Haebel and J. Tückmantel, CERN Report No. CERN/EF/RF 81-5, 1981.
32. Passband refers to the frequency bandwidth of a mode family (see, for instance, the dispersion curve in Fig. 11). For each cell of the cavity one can find one mode on this dispersion curve.
33. In comparison to we have additionally approximated ωk2-ωm2 by 2ωm(ωk-ωm).
34. J. Sekutowicz, in Proceedings of the Linear Accelerator Conference (LINAC06), Knoxville, 2006.
35. R. Sundelin, D.-O. Jeon, S.-H. Kim, and M. Doleans, in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago, IL, 2001 (IEEE, New York, 2001), http://cern.ch/AccelConf/p01/PAPERS/TPPH135.PDF.
36. International Linear Collider Reference Design Report: Volume3: Accelerator, edited by, N. Phinney, N. Toge, and, N. Walker, Reports No. ILC-REPORT-2007-001, No. CERN-2007-006, and No. DESY-FLC, Hamburg, Germany (2007).
37. H. Padamsee, J. Knobloch, and T. Hays, RF Superconductivity for Accelerators (Wiley-VCH Verlag Weinheim, 2008, ISBN 978-3-527-40842-9).
38. R. Meservey and B.B. Schwartz, in Superconductivity, edited by, R.D. Parks, (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1969), Vol. 1, p. 117.
39. L. Lilje, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 524, 1 (2004). NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/j.nima.2004.01.045