Neurexin/neuroligin interaction kinetics characterized by counting single cell-surface attached quantum dots

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 480-489

  Saint Michel, Edouard ^a   Giannone, Grégory ^a   Choquet, Daniel ^a   Thoumine, Olivier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; MEMBRANE RECEPTOR; NANOPARTICLE; NEUREXIN; NEUREXIN 1 BETA; NEUROLIGIN 1; QUANTUM DOT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; CELL SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIMERIZATION; EMBRYO; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; RAT; SYNAPSE;

EID: 68949144878     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.044     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Dustin, M. L., L. M. Ferguson, P. Y. Chan, T. A. Springer, and D. E. Golan. 1996. Visualization of CD2 interaction with LFA-3 and determination of the two-dimensional dissociation constant for adhesion receptors in a contact area. J. Cell Biol. 132:465-474.
2. Thoumine, O., M. Lambert, R. M. Mege, and D. Choquet. 2006. Regulation of N-cadherin dynamics at neuronal contacts by ligand binding and cytoskeletal coupling. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17:862-875.
3. Baksh, M. M., C. Dean, S. Pautot, S. Demaria, E. Isacoff, et al. 2005. Neuronal activation by GPI-linked neuroligin-1 displayed in synthetic lipid bilayer membranes. Langmuir. 21:10693-10698.
4. Pautot, S., H. Lee, E. Y. Isacoff, and J. T. Groves. 2005. Neuronal synapse interaction reconstituted between live cells and supported lipid bilayers. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1:283-289.
5. Comoletti, D., R. Flynn, L. L. Jennings, A. Chubykin, T. Matsumura, et al. 2003. Characterization of the interaction of a recombinant soluble neuroligin-1 with neurexin-1β. J. Biol. Chem. 278:50497-50505.
6. Perret, E., A. M. Benoliel, P. Nassoy, A. Pierres, V. Delmas, et al. 2002. Fast dissociation kinetics between individual E-cadherin fragments revealed by flow chamber analysis. EMBO J. 21:2537-2546.
7. Marshall, B. T., M. Long, J. W. Piper, T. Yago, R. P. McEver, et al. 2003. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature. 423:190-193.
8. Bayas, M. V., A. Leung, E. Evans, and D. Leckband. 2006. Lifetime measurements reveal kinetic differences between homophilic cadherin bonds. Biophys. J. 90:1385-1395.
9. Merkel, R., P. Nassoy, A. Leung, K. Ritchie, and E. Evans. 1999. Energy landscapes of receptor-ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy. Nature. 397:50-53.
10. Thoumine, O., P. Kocian, A. Kottelat, and J. J. Meister. 2000. Short-term binding of fibroblasts to fibronectin: optical tweezers experiments and probabilistic analysis. Eur. Biophys. J. 29:398-408.
11. Baumgartner, W., G. J. Schutz, J. Wiegand, N. Golenhofen, and D. Drenckhahn. 2003. Cadherin function probed by laser tweezer and single molecule fluorescence in vascular endothelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 116:1001-1011.
12. Comoletti, D., R. E. Flynn, A. A. Boucard, B. Demeler, V. Schirf, et al. 2006. Gene selection, alternative splicing, and post-translational processing regulate neuroligin selectivity for β-neurexins. Biochemistry. 45:12816-12827.
13. Reissner, C., M. Klose, R. Fairless, and M. Missler. 2008. Mutational analysis of the neurexin/neuroligin complex reveals essential and regulatory components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:15124-15129.
14. Sudhof, T. C. 2008. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature. 455:903-911.
15. Dean, C., F. G. Scholl, J. Choih, S. DeMaria, J. Berger, et al. 2003. Neurexin mediates the assembly of presynaptic terminals. Nat. Neurosci. 6:708-716.
16. Heine, M., O. Thoumine, M. Mondin, B. Tessier, G. Giannone, et al. 2008. Activity-independent and subunit-specific recruitment of functional AMPA receptors at neurexin/neuroligin contacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:20947-20952.
17. Lambert, M., F. Padilla, and R. M. Mege. 2000. Immobilized dimers of N-cadherin-Fc chimera mimic cadherin-mediated cell contact formation: contribution of both outside-in and inside-out signals. J. Cell Sci. 113:2207-2219.
18. Breillat, C., O. Thoumine, and D. Choquet. 2007. Characterization of SynCAM surface traffickingusinga SynCAM derived ligand with high homophilic binding affinity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 359:655-659.
19. Groc, L., M. Lafourcade, M. Heine, M. Renner, V. Racine, et al. 2007. Surface trafficking of neurotransmitter receptor: comparison between single-molecule/quantum dot strategies. J. Neurosci. 27:12433-12437.
20. Thoumine, O., E. Saint-Michel, C. Dequidt, J. Falk, R. Rudge, et al. 2005. Weak effect of membrane diffusion on the rate of receptor accumulation at adhesive contacts. Biophys. J. 89:L40-L42.
21. Larson, D. R., W. R. Zipfel, R. M. Williams, S. W. Clark, M. P. Bruchez, et al. 2003. Water-soluble quantum dots for multiphoton fluorescence imaging in vivo. Science. 300:1434-1436.
22. Doose, S., J. M. Tsay, F. Pinaud, and S. Weiss. 2005. Comparison of photophysical and colloidal properties of biocompatible semiconductor nanocrystals using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 77:2235-2242.
23. Howarth, M., W. Liu, S. Puthenveetil, Y. Zheng, L. F. Marshall, et al. 2008. Monovalent, reduced-size quantum dots for imaging receptors on living cells. Nat. Methods. 5:397-399.
24. Bruchez, M. P. 2008. Quantum dots in living cells: where is progress needed? NanoObjects in Living Cells, Villeneuve d'Asq, France, September 1-4. Conference abstract.
25. Bell, G. I. 1978. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science. 200:618-627.
26. Wank, S. A., C. DeLisi, and H. Metzger. 1983. Analysis of the rate-limiting step in a ligand-cell receptor interaction: the immunoglobulin E system. Biochemistry. 22:954-959.
27. Lauffenburger, D., and C. DeLisi. 1983. Cell surface receptors: physical chemistry and cellular regulation. Int. Rev. Cytol. 84:269-302.
28. Kaplanski, G., C. Farnarier, O. Tissot, A. Pierres, A. M. Benoliel, et al. 1993. Granulocyte-endothelium initial adhesion. Analysis of transient binding events mediated by E-selectin in a laminar shear flow. Biophys. J. 64:1922-1933.
29. Chesla, S. E., P. Selvaraj, and C. Zhu. 1998. Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys. J. 75:1553-1572.
30. Schmidt, C. E., T. Chen, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1994. Simulation of integrin-cytoskeletal interactions in migrating fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 67:461-474.
31. Bruchez, M. P. 2005. Turning all the lights on: quantum dots in cellular assays. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 9:533-537.
32. Thoumine, O., and J. J. Meister. 2000. Dynamics of adhesive rupture between fibroblasts and fibronectin: microplate manipulations and deterministic model. Eur. Biophys. J. 29:409-419.
33. Piper, J. W., R. A. Swerlick, and C. Zhu. 1998. Determining force dependence of two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding affinity by centrifugation. Biophys. J. 74:492-513.
34. Saffman, P. G., and M. Delbruck. 1975. Brownian motion in biological membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72:3111-3113.
35. Cicuta, P., S. L. Keller, and S. L. Veatch. 2007. Diffusion of liquid domains in lipid bilayer membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 111:3328-3331.
36. Kucik, D. F., E. L. Elson, and M. P. Sheetz. 1999. Weak dependence of mobility of membrane protein aggregates on aggregate size supports a viscous model of retardation of diffusion. Biophys. J. 76:314-322.
37. Petrov, E. P., and P. Schwille. 2008. Translational diffusion in lipid membranes beyond the Saffman-Delbruck approximation. Biophys. J. 94:L41-L43.
38. Gambin, Y., R. Lopez-Esparza, M. Reffay, E. Sierecki, N. S. Gov, et al. 2006. Lateral mobility of proteins in liquid membranes revisited. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:2098-2102.
39. Guigas, G., and M. Weiss. 2006. Size-dependent diffusion of membrane inclusions. Biophys. J. 91:2393-2398.
40. Naji, A., A. J. Levine, and P. A. Pincus. 2007. Corrections to the Saffman-Delbruck mobility for membrane bound proteins. Biophys. J. 93:L49-L51.
41. DeLisi, C., and R. Chabay. 1979. The influence of cell surface receptor clustering on the thermodynamics of ligand binding and the kinetics of its dissociation. Cell Biophys. 1:117-131.