Performance evaluation of an autonomic network-aware metascheduler for Grids

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 21, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1692-1708

  Caminero, A ^a,c   Rana, O ^b   Caminero, B ^a   Carrion C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN INFORMÁTICA DE ALBACETE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Autonomic systems; Grid computing; Network quality of service

Indexed keywords

QUALITY OF SERVICE; SCHEDULING;

AUTONOMIC NETWORK; AUTONOMIC SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED RESOURCES; GRID APPLICATIONS; GRID TECHNOLOGIES; META-SCHEDULERS; NETWORK QUALITY OF SERVICES; SCHEDULING STRATEGIES;

GRID COMPUTING;

EID: 68949139299     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1393     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Foster I, Kesselman C. The Grid 2: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure (2nd edn). Morgan Kaufmann: Los Altos, CA, 2003.
2. Marchese FT, Brajkovska N. Fostering asynchronous collaborative visualization. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Visualization, Washington, DC, U.S.A., 2007. (Pubitemid 47591736)
3. Roy A. End-to-end quality of service for high-end applications. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, 2001.
4. Bhatti S, S0rensen S, Clark P, Crowcroft J. Network QoS for grid systems. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 2003; 17(3):219-236.
5. Al-Ali R, Sohail S, Rano O, Abdelhakim H, Von Laszewski, Amin K, Jha S, Walker D. Network QoS provision for distributed grid applications. International Journal ofSimulations Systems, Science and Technology, Special Issue on Grid Performance and Dependability 2004; 5(5):13-28.
6. Adami D et al. Design and implementation of a grid network-aware resource broker. Proceedings ofthe International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Networks, Innsbruck, Austria, 2006. (Pubitemid 46514340)
7. Caminero A, Carrión C, Caminero B. Designing an entity to provide network QoS in a Grid system. Proceedings of the 1st Iberian Grid Infrastructure Conference (IberGrid), Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2007.
8. VIOLA: Vertically integrated optical testbed for large application in DFN, 2006. Web site from http://www.viola-testbed.de/ [accessed on July 2008].
9. Waldrich O, Wieder P, Ziegler W. A meta-scheduling service for co-allocating arbitrary types of resources. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics (PPAM), Poznan, Poland, 2005.
10. Chu HH, Nahrstedt K. CPU service classes for multimedia applications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems ( ICMCS) , Florence, Italy, 1999.
11. Mateescu G. Extending the portable batch system with preemptive job scheduling. SC2000: High Performance Networking and Computing, Dallas, U.S.A., 2000.
12. Dong X, Hariri S, Xue L, Chen H, Zhang M, Pavuluri S, Rao S. Autonomia: An autonomic computing environment. Proceedings ofthe International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC), Phoenix, U.S.A., 2003.
13. Liu H, Parashar M, Hariri S. A component-based programming model for autonomic applications. Proceedings ofthe International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC), New York, U.S.A., 2004.
14. Abawajy JH. Autonomic job scheduling policy for grid computing. Fifth International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS), Atlanta, U.S.A., 2005.
15. Caminero A, Rana O, Caminero B, Carrión C. An autonomic network-aware scheduling architecture for grid computing. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing (MGC), Newport Beach, U.S.A., 2007.
16. Fitzgerald S, Foster I, Kesselman C, von Laszewski G, Smith W, Tuecke S. A directory service for configuring high- performance distributed computations. Proceedings ofthe 6th Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC), Portland, U.S.A., 1997.
17. Massie ML, Chun BN, Culler DE. The Ganglia distributed monitoring system: design, implementation, and experience. Parallel Computing 2004; 30(5-6):817-840.
18. Sohail S, Pham KB, Nguyen R, Jha S. Bandwidth broker implementation: Circa-complete and integrable. Technical Report, School of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of New South Wales, 2003.
19. Stevens WR. TCP/IP Illustrated: The Protocols. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1994.
20. McCloghrie K, Rose MT. Management Information Base for Network Management ofTCP/IP-based Internets: MIB-II. Internet proposed standard RFC, 12-13 March 1991.
21. Huedo E, Montero RS, Llorente IM. A modular meta-scheduling architecture for interfacing with pre-WS and WS grid resource management services. Future Generation Computing Systems 2007; 23(2):252-261. (Pubitemid 44374078)
22. Sulistio A, Poduval G, Buyya R, Tham CK. On incorporating differentiated levels of network service into GridSim. Future Generation Computer Systems 2007; 23(4):606-615. (Pubitemid 46185694)
23. LCG Computing Fabric Area. Web Page 2008. http://lcg-computing-fabric. web.cern.ch [accessed on July 2008].
24. Cirne W, Brasileiro F, Sauv J, Andrade N, Paranhos D, Santos-Neto E, Medeiros R, Silva F. Grid computing for bag-of-tasks applications. Proceedings of the Third IFIP Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2003.
25. ATLAS online monitoring and calibration system. Web Page 2008. http://dissemination.interactive-grid.eu/applications HEP [accessed on July 2008].