Moving homes: From house to nursing home and the (Un-)canniness of being at home

Space and Culture

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 218-231

  Schillmeier, Michael ^a   Heinlein, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Assistive technologies; Being at home; Constant care; Movement (un )canniness

Indexed keywords

EID: 68949123405     PISSN: 12063312     EISSN: 15528308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1206331208330759     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Anderson, P., & Heinlein, M. (2003). Ein Blick in die Alltagspraxis im Pflegeheim: Über Möglichkeiten einer praxisnahen Form von Kundenorientierung [A look into the every day practice of a nursing home: On practice orientated forms of customer orientation]. In D. Sing & E. Kistler (Eds.), Lernfeld Altenpflege: Praxisprojekte zur Verbesserung der Dienstleistung an und mit alten Menschen (pp. 81-97). Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
3. Berg, M. (1998). Order(s) and disorder(s): Of protocols and medical practices. In M. Berg & A. Mol (Eds.), Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies (pp. 226-246). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
4. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Dodier, N. (1998). Clinical practice and procedures in occupational medicine: A study of the framing of individuals. In M. Berg & A. Mol (Eds.), Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies (pp. 53-85). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
6. Dunkel, W., & Voß, G. G. (Eds.). (2004). Dienstleistung als Interaktion [Service as interaction]. Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
7. Fisher, B. J. (1991). It's not quite like home: Illness career descent and the stigma of living at a multilevel care retirement facility. New York: Garland.
8. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
10. Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement of the sexes. Theory and Society, 4, 301-331.
11. Goffman, E. (1988). Gender advertisement. New York: HarperCollins.
12. Gröning, K. (1997). Pflege in Zeiten der Fortschritts- und Konsumphilosophie: Qualitätssicherung in der Pflege [Care in a time of philosophies of progress and consumption: Quality assurance in care work]. Mabuse, 108, 29-36.
13. Gröning, K. (1998). Entweihung und Scham: Grenzsituationen bei der Pflege alter Menschen [Profanation and shame: Extreme situations in caring the elderly]. Frankfurt, Germany: Mabuse.
14. Gröning, K. (2001). Qualität in der Pflege als Problem der Organisationskulturen. [Quality of care as a problem of organizational cultures]. Pflegemagazin, 1, 38-47.
15. Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York: State University of New York Press.
16. Heinlein, M. (2003). Pflege in Aktion: Zur Materialität alltäglicher Pflegepraxis [Care in action: On the materiality of everyday care work]. Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
17. Hetherington, K. (1997). In place of geometry: The materiality of place. In K. Hetherington & R. Munro (Eds.), Ideas of difference: Social spaces and the labour of division (pp. 183-199). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
18. Klie, T. (2005). Pflegeversicherung [Nursing care insurance]. Hanover, Germany: Vincentz.
19. Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103-131). London: Routledge.
20. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, 2, 29-64.
21. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
23. Moser, I., & Law, J. (1999). Good passages, bad passages. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 196-219). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24. Peper, M. (2000). Pflege als Beziehungsprozess oder das Leiden am Leiden Anderer. [Care as relationship process or the suffering from the suffering of others]. Pflegemagazin, 3, 35-38.
25. Scheffel, F. (2000). Lebenswelt in der Pflege. Anforderungen an die berufliche Pflege [Life-worlds of care. Demands on care work]. Lage, Germany: Jacobs.
26. Schillmeier, M. (2007a). Politik des Behindert-Werdens. Behinderung als Erfahrung und Ereignis. [The politics of becoming disabled. Disability as experience and event]. In W. Schneider & A. Waldschmidt (Eds.), Disability studies, Kultursoziologie und Soziologie der Behinderung. Erkundungen in einem neuen Forschungsfeld (pp. 79-99). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
27. Schillmeier, M. (2007b). Dis/abling spaces of calculation: Blindness and money in everyday life. Environmental and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 594-609.
28. Schillmeier, M. (2007c). Dis/abling practices: Rethinking disability. In Th. Schatzki (Ed.), Action & practice theory [Special Issue]. Human Affairs, 17, 195-208.
29. Schillmeier, M. (2008a). (Visual) Disability: From exclusive perspectives to inclusive differences. Disability & Society, 23(6), 611-623.
30. Schillmeier, M. (2008b). Times-spaces of in/dependence and dis/ability. Time & Society, 17(2/3), 215-231.
31. Schillmeier, M. (2009). Actor-networks of dementia. In M. Schillmeier & J. Latimer (Eds.), Un/ knowing bodies. Oxford, UK: Blackwell pp. 141-160.
32. Schneekloth, U., & Müller, U. (1999). Wirkungen der Pflegeversicherung [Consequences of the nursing care insurance]. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit (Vol. 127). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
33. Strathern, M. (2004). Partial connections. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.
34. World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Retrieved January 30, 2009, http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm