Detection and typicality of bound entangled states

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Bae, Joonwoo ^a   Tiersch, Markus ^b   Sauer, Simeon ^c   De Melo, Fernando ^e   Mintert, Florian ^b   Hiesmayr, Beatrix ^d   Buchleitner, Andreas ^b  

^a Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIPARTITE QUANTUM STATE; BOUND ENTANGLED STATE; BOUND ENTANGLEMENT; LARGE CLASS; LOWER BOUNDS;

CONTROL THEORY; QUANTUM OPTICS;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 68949122621     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.022317     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722
2. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5239
3. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413
4. P. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997). 10.1016/S0375-9601(97)00416- 7
5. Caveat: the existence of non-PPT entangled states remains open.
6. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314
7. M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, J. I. Cirac, and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052310
8. R. A. Bertlmann, K. Durstberger, B. C. Hiesmayr, and P. Krammer, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052331 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052331
9. B. Baumgartner, B. C. Hiesmayr, and H. Narnhofer, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032327 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.032327
10. R. A. Bertlmann and P. Krammer, Phys. Rev. A 77, 024303 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.024303
11. R. A. Bertlmann and P. Krammer, Phys. Rev. A 78, 014303 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.014303
12. F. Mintert, M. Kuś, and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260502 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260502
13. F. Mintert, Phys. Rep. 415, 207 (2005). 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.04.006
14. S. Hill and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5022
15. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80. 2245
16. F. Mintert and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012336 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012336
17. N. J. Cerf, M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 127902 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.127902
18. K. G. H. Vollbrecht and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 64, 062307 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062307
19. E. Størmer, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 86, 402 (1982). 10.2307/2044436
20. B. Baumgartner, B. C. Hiesmayr, and H. Narnhofer, Phys. Lett. A 372, 2190 (2008). 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.11.028
21. K. Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.883
22. K. Zyczkowski, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3496 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.3496
23. S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Ghosh, and V. Roychowdhury, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032318 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032318