Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 261-267

  Pevzner, Leo ^a   Rayburn, William F ^a   Rumney, Pamela ^a   Wing, Deborah A ^a  

^a Univ Of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MISOPROSTOL; PROSTAGLANDIN E2;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LABOR INDUCTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIPARA; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS INDEX; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; DINOPROSTONE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, INDUCED; MATERNAL AGE; MISOPROSTOL; OXYTOCICS; PARITY; PREGNANCY; SUPPOSITORIES; VAGINA;

EID: 68949119458     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ad9377     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56:1-103.
2. Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:164-7.
3. Baacke KA, Edwards RK. Preinduction cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:564-72.
4. Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:266-8.
5. Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:690-7.
6. Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 2004;15:319-23.
7. Wing DA, Tran S, Paul RH. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1237-40.
8. Arulkumaran S, Gibb DM, TambyRaja RL, Heng SH, Ratnam SS. Failed induction of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;25:190-3.
9. Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilatation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:452-6.
10. Wing DA; %Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Consortium. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized control trial. Obset Gynecol 2008;112:801-12.
11. O'Reilly-Green C, Divon M. Sonographic and clinical methods in the diagnosis of macrosomia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43:309-20.
12. World Health Organization. BMI classification. Available at: .Retrieved January 14, 2009.
13. Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002. Adv Data 2004;347:1-17.
14. Ehrenberg HM, Dierker L, Milluzzi Mercer BM. Prevalence of maternal obesity in an urban center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1189-93.
15. Rosenberg TJ, Garbers S, Chavkin W, Chiasson MA. Prepregnancy weight and adverse perinatal outcomes in an ethnically diverse population. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1022-7.
16. Carrol CS, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Morrison JC. Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1516-20.
17. Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, Phatak D, Gilstrap LC, 3rd et al. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:305.e1-5.
18. McGlade MS, Saha S, Dahlstrom ME. The Latina paradox: an opportunity for restructuring prenatal care delivery. Am J Public Health 2004;94:2062-5.