|
Volumn 250, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 353-354
|
Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CONVALESCENCE;
EXPERIENCE;
FOLLOW UP;
HERNIOPLASTY;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
INGUINAL HERNIA;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
LETTER;
LONG TERM CARE;
MEDICAL LEAVE;
NEURALGIA;
OPEN MESH REPAIR;
OPERATION DURATION;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT SAFETY;
PERITONEAL CAVITY;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RECURRENCE RISK;
RECURRENT DISEASE;
REOPERATION;
SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION;
SURGEON;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
LAPAROSCOPY;
MEDICAL ERROR;
NOTE;
STATISTICS;
SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
CLINICAL TRIALS DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES;
HERNIA, INGUINAL;
HUMANS;
LAPAROSCOPY;
MEDICAL ERRORS;
RECURRENCE;
REOPERATION;
SURGICAL MESH;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
|
EID: 68949116461
PISSN: 00034932
EISSN: 15281140
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b21601 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (5)
|