Factors associated with sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer at national comprehensive cancer network centers

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 250, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 260-267

  Temple, Larissa K ^a   Romanus, Dorothy ^b   Niland, Joyce ^c   Veer, Anna Ter ^c   Weiser, Martin R ^a   Skibber, John ^d   Wilson, John ^e   Rajput, Ashwani ^f   Benson, Al ^g   Wong, Yu Ning ^h   Schrag, Deborah ^h  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; SPHINCTER PRESERVING SURGERY; STOMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; AGE; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; RECTUM TUMOR; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIOECONOMICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 68949110433     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ae330e     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ricciardi R, Virnig BA, Madoff RD, et al. The status of radical proctectomy and sphincter-sparing surgery in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1119-1127.
2. Martinez SR, Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. Treatment disparities in Hispanic rectal cancer patients: a SEER database study. Am Surg. 2006;72:906-908.
3. Rogers SO Jr, Wolf RE, Zaslawsky AM, et al. Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2006;244:1003-1011.
4. Purves H, Pietrobon R, Hervey S, et al. Relationship between surgeon caseload and sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:195-204.
5. McGrath DR, Leong DC, Gibberd R, et al. Surgeon and hospital volume and the management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:901-910.
6. Harling HL, Bülow S, Moller L, et al. Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994-1999. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:90-95.
7. Meyerhardt JA, Tepper JE, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the intergroup 0114 study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:166-174.
8. Hodgson DC, Zhang W, Zaslawsky AM, et al. Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:708-716.
9. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, et al. Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1397-1402.
10. Hyman N, Healey C, Osler T, et al. Understanding variation in the management of rectal cancer: the potential of a surgeon-initiated database. Am J Surg. 2007;194:559-562.
11. Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, et al. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;227:157-167.
12. Borowski DW, Kelly SB, Bradburn DM, et al. Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94:880-889.
13. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731-1740.
14. Charlson ME, Pompein P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373-383.
15. Rödel C, Sauer R. Radiotherapy and concurrent radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 2004;13:93-101.
16. Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Shia J, et al. A prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy: implications for sphincter preservation. Ann Surg. 2007; 245:88-93.
17. Vernava AM III, Moran M, Rothenberger DA, et al. A prospective evaluation of distal margins in carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 175:333-336.
18. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, et al. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3517-3522.
19. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, et al. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg. 2005;241:465-469.
20. Kapitejin E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:638-646.
21. Jessup JM, Stewart AK, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on patterns of care for adenocarcinoma of the rectum, 1985-1995. Cancer. 1998; 83:2408-2418.
22. Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS. Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD006040.
23. Fazio VW, Zutshi M, Remzi FH, et al. A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg. 2007;246:481-488.
24. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegǎrd J, et al. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:207-214.
25. Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:52-60.
26. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Feinglass JM, et al. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4626-4633.
27. Ptok H, Marusch F, Kuhn R, et al. Influence of hospital volume on the frequency of abdominoperineal resection and long-term oncological outcomes in low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:854-861.
28. Cornish JA, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, et al. A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2056-2068.