Explicit algebraic Reynolds stress and non-linear eddy-viscosity models

International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 349-361

  Hellsten, Antti ^a   Wallin, Stefan ^b,c  

^a FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY   (Sweden)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Explicit algebraic Reynolds stress modelling; Non linear eddy viscosity modelling; Turbulence modelling; Weak equilibrium assumption

Indexed keywords

EID: 68949090040     PISSN: 10618562     EISSN: 10290257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10618560902776828     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Apsley, D. and Leschziner, M., 1998. A new low-Reynolds-number nonlinear two-equation turbulence model for complex flows. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 19, 209-222.
2. Arina, R. and Ceresola, N., 2006. Numerical simulation of the aerodynamic flow field and radiated noise of a transonic cavity. In: P. Wesseling, E. Oñate, and J. Périaux, eds. European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics ECCOMAS CFD 2006. The Netherlands: TU Delft. CD Rom.
3. Bézard, H. and Daris, T., 2005. Calibrating the length scale equation with an explicit algebraic Reynolds stress constitutive relation. In: W. Rodi and M. Mulas, eds. Engineering turbulence modelling and experiments 6. Villasmius, Sardinia, Italy: Elsevier, 77-86.
4. Bigarella, E. and Azevedo, J., 2007. Advanced eddy-viscosity and Reynolds-stress turbulence model simulations of aerospace applications. AIAA Journal, 45 (10), 2369-2390.
5. Breuer, M., Jaffrezic, B., and Aybay, O., 2008. A hybrid LES-RANS technique using an explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model. In: B. Schrefler and U. Perego, eds. 8th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM8) & 5th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS 2008), Venice, Italy.
6. Catris, S. and Aupoix, B., 2000. Towards a calibration of the length-scale equation. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 21 (5), 606-613.
7. Cazalbou, J.B., Spalart, P., and Bradshaw, P., 1994. On the behavior of the two-equation models at the edge of a turbulent region. Physics of Fluids, 6 (5), 1797-1804.
8. Craft, T. and Launder, B., 1996. A Reynolds stress closure for complex geometries. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 17 (3), 245-254.
9. Craft, T., Launder, B., and Suga, K., 1996. Development and application of a cubic eddy-viscosity model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 17, 108-115.
10. Craft, T., Launder, B., and Suga, K., 1997. Prediction of turbulent transitional phenomena with a nonlinear eddy-viscosity model. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 18, 15-28.
11. Crippa, S., 2008. Advances in vortical flow prediction methods for design of delta-winged aircraft. Thesis (PhD). Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
12. Daly, B. and Harlow, F., 1970. Transport equations of turbulence. Physics of Fluids, 13, 2634-2649.
13. Eliasson, P. and Peng, S.H., 2008. Drag prediction for the DLR-F6 wing-body configuration using the Edge solver. Journal of Aircraft, 45 (3), 837-847.
14. Gatski, T. and Jongen, T., 2000. Nonlinear eddy viscosity and algebraic stress models for solving complex turbulent flows. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 36 (8), 655-682.
15. Gatski, T. and Speziale, C., 1993. On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 254, 59-78.
16. Gatski, T. and Wallin, S., 2004. Extending the weakequilibrium assumption condition for algebraic Reynolds stress models to rotating and curved flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 518, 147-155.
17. Girimaji, S., 1996. Fully explicit and self-consistent algebraic Reynolds stress model. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 8, 387-402.
18. Girimaji, S., 1997. A Galilean invariant explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for turbulent curved flows. Physics of Fluids, 9 (4), 1067-1077.
19. Grundestam, O., Wallin, S., and Johansson, A., 2005a. An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model based on a nonlinear pressure strain rate model. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 26 (5), 732-745.
20. Grundestam, O., Wallin, S., and Johansson, A., 2005b. Techniques for deriving explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models based on incomplete sets of basis tensors and predictions of fully developed rotating pipe flow. Physics of Fluids, 17 (11), 1-13.
21. Hamba, F., 2006. Euclidian invariance and weak-equilibrium condition for the algebraic Reynolds stress model. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 569, 399-408.
22. Hanjalic, K. and Launder, B.E., 1972. A Reynolds stress model of turbulence and its application to thin shear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 52 (4), 609-638.
23. Hellsten, A., 2002. Curvature corrections for algebraic Reynolds stress modelling: a discussion. AIAA Journal, 40 (9), 1909-1911.
24. Hellsten, A., 2004. New two-equation turbulence model for aerodynamics applications. Thesis (PhD). Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland ISBN 951-22-6933-3 (print), 951-22-6934-1 (pdf, available at http://lib.hut.fi/Diss/).
25. Hellsten, A., 2005. New advanced k-ω turbulence model for high-lift aerodynamics. AIAA Journal, 43 (9), 1857-1869.
26. Hellsten, A. and Bézard, H., 2005. Behaviour of nonlinear two-equation turbulence models at the free-stream edges of turbulent flows. In: W. Rodi and M. Mulas, eds. Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 6. Elsevier.
27. Johansson, A. and Wallin, S., 1996. A new explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model. In: P.Monkewitz, ed. Proceedings of 6th European Turbulence Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland.
28. Jongen, T. and Gatski, T., 1998. General explicit algebraic stress relations and best approximation for three-dimensional flows. International Journal of Engineering Science, 36, 739-763.
29. Jongen, T., Machiels, L., and Gatski, T., 1998. Predicting noninertial effects with linear and nonlinear eddy-viscosity, and algebraic stress models. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 60, 215-234.
30. Kok, J., 2000. Resolving the dependence on freestream values for the k-ω turbulence model. AIAA Journal, 38 (7), 1292-1295.
31. Launder, B.E., Reece, G.J., and Rodi, W., 1975. Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 68 (3), 537-566.
32. Launder, B.E. and Sharma, B.I., 1974. Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc. Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer, 1, 131-138.
33. Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B., 1974. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 3, 269-289.
34. Lumley, J., 1978. Computational Modelling of Turbulent Flows. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 18, 123-176.
35. Manceau, R., 2003. Accounting for wall-induced Reynolds stress anisotropy in explicit algebraic stress models. In: 3rd International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Sendai, Japan.
36. Marstorp, L., Brethouwer, G., and Johansson, A., 2007. An explicit algebraic subgrid stress model for LES of rotating flows. In: 18ème Congrès Francais de Mècanique, Grenoble.
37. Menter, F., 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32 (8), 1598-1605.
38. Peng, S.H. and Eliasson, P., 2004. A comparison of turbulence models in prediction of flow around the DLR-F6 aircraft configuration. In: 22nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference and Exhibit, Providence, Rhode Island. AIAA-2004-4718: AIAA.
39. Pope, S., 1975. A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 72, 331-340.
40. Rizzi, A., Jirasek, J., Lamar, E., Crippa, S., Badcock, K., and Boelens, O., 2008. Lessons learned from numerical simulations of the F-16XL at flight conditions. Journal of Aircraft, In press.
41. Roback, R. and Johnson, B., 1983. Mass and momentum turbulent transport experiments with confined swirling coaxial jets. Technical report, NASA CR-168252, Cleveland, OH: NASA.
42. Rodi, W., 1972. The prediction of free turbulent boundary layer by use of a two-equation model of turbulence. Thesis (PhD). University of London.
43. Rodi, W., 1976. A new algebraic relation for calculating the Reynolds stresses. Zeitschrift for Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 56, 219-221.
44. Rodi, W. and Scheuerer, G., 1983. Calculations of curved shear layers with two equation turbulence models. Physics of Fluids, 26, 1422-1436.
45. Rubinstein, R. and Barton, J., 1990. Nonlinear Reynolds stress models and the renormalisation group. Physics of Fluids A, 2, 1472-1476.
46. Rumsey, C.L., Gatski, T., and Morrison, J., 2000. Turbulence Model Predictions of Strongly Curved Flow in a U-Duct. AIAA Journal, 38 (8), 1394-1402.
47. Rung, T., 2000. Entwicklung anisotroper Wirbelzhigkeitsbeziehungen mit Hilfe von Projektionstechniken. Thesis (PhD). Technical University Berlin.
48. Shabbir, A. and Shih, T., 1992. Critical assesment of Reynolds stress turbulence models using homogeneous flows. Technical report TM 105954, ICOMP-92-24, CMOTT-92-12, NASA.
49. Shih, T., Zhu, J., and Lumley, J., 1995. A new Reynolds stress algebraic equation model. Computational Methods for Applied Mechanical Engineering, 125, 287-302.
50. So, R. and Mellor, G., 1973. Experiment on convex curvature effects in turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 60 (1), 43-62.
51. Spalart, P. and Allmaras, S., 1994. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. La Recherche Aèrospatiale, Number 1, 5-21.
52. Spalart, P. and Speziale, C., 1999. A note on constraints in turbulence modelling. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 391, 373-376.
53. Spencer, A.J.M. and Rivlin, R.S., 1959. The theory of matrix polynomials and its application to the mechanics of isotropic continua. Archive for Rational Mechanics Analysis, 2, 309-336.
54. Speziale, C.G., 1987. On nonlinear k-1 and k-ε models of turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 178, 459-475.
55. Taulbee, D.B., 1992. An improved algebraic Reynolds stress model and corresponding nonlinear stress model. Physics of Fluids A, 4 (11), 2555-2560.
56. Vos, J., Rizzi, A., and Hirschel, E., 2002. Navier-Stokes solvers in European aircraft design. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38, 601-697.
57. Wallin, S. and Girimaji, S., 2000. Evolution of an isolated turbulent trailing vortex. AIAA Journal, 38 (4), 657-665.
58. Wallin, S., Hellsten, A., Schatz, M., Rung, T., Peshkin, D., and Johansson, A., 2003. Streamline curvature corrected algebraic Reynolds stress turbulence modelling. In: 3rd International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Sendai, Japan.
59. Wallin, S. and Johansson, A., 2000. An explicit algebraic Reynolds stressmodel for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 403, 89-132.
60. Wallin, S. and Johansson, A., 2002. Modelling streamline curvature effects in explicit algebraic Reynolds stress turbulence models. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 23 (5), 721-730.
61. Wilcox, D., 1988. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA Journal, 26 (11), 1299-1310.
62. Ying, R. and Canuto, V., 1996. Turbulence modelling over two-dimensional hills using an algebraic Reynolds stress expression. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 77, 69-99.