Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy

Gynecological Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 223-228

  Kluivers, Kirsten B ^a   Opmeer, Brent C ^b   Geomini, Peggy M ^c   Bongers, Marlies Y ^c   Vierhout, Mark E ^a   Bremer, Gérard L ^d   Mol, Ben W J ^b,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d Zuyderland Medical Centre   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Abdominal hysterectomy; Interview; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Patients' preference; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NURSE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

EID: 68949088682     PISSN: 16132076     EISSN: 16132084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10397-008-0455-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F (1989) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 5:213-216
2. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R (2005) Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Brit Med J 330:1478
3. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2005) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003677
4. Makinen J, Johansson J, Tomas C, Tomas E, Heinonen PK, Laatikainen T et al (2001) Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 16:1473-1478
5. Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R et al (2002) The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:339-345
6. Kolkman W, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Jansen FW (2007) Operative laparoscopy in The Netherlands: diffusion and acceptance. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:245-248
7. Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg: Van weten naar doen. Zoetermeer: RVZ, 2006
8. Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg (2007) Rapport Risico's minimaal invasieve chirurgie onderschat, kwaliteitssysteem voor laparoscopische operaties ontbreekt
9. Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S (2001) Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 19(11):2883-2885
10. Skea Z, Harry V, Bhattacharya S, Entwistle V, Williams B, MacLennan G, Templeton A (2004 ) Women's perceptions of decision-making about hysterectomy. BJOG 111:133-142 (Feb)
11. Entwistle V, Williams B, Skea Z, MacLennan G, Bhattacharya S (2006) Which surgical decisions should patients participate in and how? Reflections on women's recollections of discussions about variants of hysterectomy. Soc Sei Med 62:499-509
12. Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW, Bongers MY, Bremer GL, de Vet HC, Vierhout ME, Brolmann HA (2007) Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:145-152
13. Karaman Y, Bingol B, Gunenc Z (2007) Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy: experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:78-84
14. Koh LW, Koh PH, Lin LC, Ng WJ, Wong E, Huang MH (2004) A simple procedure for the prevention of ureteral injury in laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:167-169
15. Shen CC, Wu MP, Kung FT, Huang FJ, Hsieh CH, Lan KC et al (2003) Major complications associated with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: ten-year experience. J Am. Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:147-153
16. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, Clayton R, Phillips G, Whittaker M, Lilford R, Bridgman S, Brown J (2004) The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. Br Med J 328:129
17. Canis MJ, Wattiez A, Mage G, Bruhat MA (2004 ) Results of eVALuate study of hysterectomy techniques: laparoscopic hysterectomy may yet have a bright future. Br Med J 328:642.....643 (author reply 643, Mar 13)
18. Donnez J, Squifflet J, Jadoul P, Smets M (2004 ) Results of eVALuate study of hysterectomy techniques: high rate of complications needs explanation. Brit Med J 328(7440):643 (author reply 643, Mar 13)
19. Chien P, Khan K, Mol BW (2005) How to interpret the findings of the eVALuate study. BJOG 112:391-393 (Apr)
20. Kluivers KB, Mol BW, Khan KS, Johnson NP (2008) Comparison of hysterectomy techniques and cost-benefit analysis. In O'Donovan & Miller: Modern Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
21. Bourdrez P, Bongers MY, Mol BW (2004) Treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: patient preferences for endometrial ablation, a levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine device, or hysterectomy. Fertil Steril 82:160-166
22. Opmeer BC, Heydendael VM, deBorgie CA, Spuls PI, Bossuyt PM, Bos JD, de Rie MA (2007) Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis preferred oral therapies to phototherapies: a preference assessment based on clinical scenarios with trade-off questions. J Clin Epidemiol 60:696-703
23. Stiggelbout AM, de Haes JC (2001) Patient preference for cancer therapy: an overview of measurement approaches. J Clin Oncol 19:220-230