Laparoscopic scissors: A subjective and objective comparison of three brands

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1359-1363

  Harper, Jonathan D ^a   Figueroa, Heather ^a   Ebrahimi, Kamyar ^a   Baldwin, D Duane ^a  

^a LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SCISSOR; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURGEON; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL STAPLING; VOLUNTEER;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 68949086111     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0654     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1991;146:278-282.
2. Fengler TW, Pahlke H, Kraas E. Sterile and economic instrumentation in laparoscopic surgery. Experiences with 6,000 surgical laparoscopies, 1990-1996. Surg Endosc 1998;12: 1275-1279.
3. Fengler TW, Pahlke H, Bisson S, Kraas E. The clinical suitability of laparoscopic instrumentation. A prospective clinical study of function and hygiene. Surg Endosc 2000;14:388-394.
4. Adler S, Scherrer M, Riickauer KD, Daschner FD. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2005;19:268-272.