Comparison of Non-Invasive Multi-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Evaluation of Men With Known Coronary Artery Disease

American Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 653-656

  van Werkhoven, Jacob M ^a,b   Schuijf, Joanne D ^a   Jukema, J Wouter ^a,b   Pundziute, Gabija ^a   de Roos, Albert ^a   Schalij, Martin J ^a   van der Wall, Ernst E ^a,b   Bax, Jeroen J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEN'S HEALTH; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY DISEASE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 68849119015     PISSN: 00029149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.045     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hamon M., Biondi-Zoccai G.G., Malagutti P., Agostoni P., Morello R., Valgimigli M., and Hamon M. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1896-1910
2. Hausleiter J., Meyer T., Hadamitzky M., Zankl M., Gerein P., Dorrler K., Kastrati A., Martinoff S., and Schomig A. Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter Resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J 28 (2007) 3034-3041
3. Leber A.W., Knez A., von Z.F., Becker A., Nikolaou K., Paul S., Wintersperger B., Reiser M., Becker C.R., Steinbeck G., and Boekstegers P. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 147-154
4. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., Van Mieghem C.A.G., Runza G., McFadden E.P., Baks T., Serruys P.W., Krestin G.P., and de Feyter P.J. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112 (2005) 2318-2323
5. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., and Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
6. Schuijf J.D., Pundziute G., Jukema J.W., Lamb H.J., van der Hoeven B.L., de R.A., van der Wall E.E., and Bax J.J. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 98 (2006) 145-148
7. Gaemperli O., Schepis T., Koepfli P., Valenta I., Soyka J., Leschka S., Desbiolles L., Husmann L., Alkadhi H., and Kaufmann P.A. Accuracy of 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionally relevant coronary stenoses as assessed with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34 (2007) 1162-1171
8. Hacker M., Jakobs T., Hack N., Nikolaou K., Becker C., von Z.F., Knez A., Konig A., Klauss V., Reiser M., Hahn K., and Tiling R. Sixty-four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34 (2007) 4-10
9. Rispler S., Keidar Z., Ghersin E., Roguin A., Soil A., Dragu R., Litmanovich D., Frenkel A., Aronson D., Engel A., Beyar R., and Israel O. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 1059-1067
10. Schuijf J.D., Wijns W., Jukema J.W., Atsma D.E., Roos A., de Lamb H.J., Stokkel M.P.M., Dibbets-Schneider P., Decramer I., De Bondt P., van der Wall E.E., Vanhoenacker P.K., and Bax J.J. The relationship between non-invasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 2508-2514
11. Pijls N.H., De B.B., Peels K., Van D., V, Bonnier H.J., Bartunek J.K.J., and Koolen J.J. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334 (1996) 1703-1708
12. Meijboom W.B., Van Mieghem C.A., Van P.N., Weustink A., Pugliese F., Mollet N.R., Boersma E., Regar E., van Geuns R.J., de Jaegere P.J., Serruys P.W., Krestin G.P., and de Feyter P.J. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52 (2008) 636-643
13. Christou M.A., Siontis G.C., Katritsis D.G., and Ioannidis J.P. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 99 (2007) 450-456
14. Di Carli M.F., and Hachamovitch R. New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 115 (2007) 1464-1480
15. Camici P.G., and Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 830-840
16. Pijls N.H., van S.P., Manoharan G., Boersma E., Bech J.W., van't V.M., Bar F., Hoorntje J., Koolen J., Wijns W., and De B.B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 2105-2111
17. Silber S., Albertsson P., Aviles F.F., Camici P.G., Colombo A., Hamm C., Jorgensen E., Marco J., Nordrehaug J.E., Ruzyllo W., Urban P., Stone G.W., Wijns W., and Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur Heart J 26 (2005) 804-847
18. Gilard M., Le Gal G., Cornily J., Vinsonneau U., Joret C., Pennec P., Mansourati J., and Boschat J. Midterm prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal multislice computed tomographic findings. Arch Intern Med 165 (2007) 1686-1689
19. Min J.K., Shaw L.J., Devereux R.B., Okin P.M., Weinsaft J.W., Russo D.J., Lippolis N.J., Berman D.S., and Callister T.Q. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50 (2007) 1161-1170
20. Pundziute G., Schuijf J.D., Jukema J.W., Boersma E., de R.A., van der Wall E.E., and Bax J.J. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 62-70