Is the ECX a legitimate surrogate for a NOEC?

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 351-353

  Fox, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; POLLUTANT; STATISTICS; TOXICITY TESTING;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 68849109690     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/1551-3793-5.3.351     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Jager T, Heugens EHW, Kooijman SALM. 2006. Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models. Ecotoxicology 15:305-314.
2. Kooijman SALM. 2006. An alternative for NOEC exists, but the standard model has to be abandoned first. Oikos 75:310-316.
3. Nelder JA. 1999. Statistics for the millennium: From statistics to statistical science. The Statistician 48:257-269.
4. [OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2006. Current approaches in the statistical analysis of ecotoxicology data: A guidance to application. Series on testing and assessment, 54. Environmental Health and Safety Publications, Series on testing and assessment. ENV/JM/MONO(2006)18.
5. van der Hoeven N. 2004. Current issues in statistics and models for ecotoxicological risk assessment. Acta Biotheoret 52:201-217.