Competitive STDP-based spike pattern learning

Neural Computation

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1259-1276

  Masquelier, Timothée ^a,b   Guyonneau, Rudy ^a   Thorpe, Simon J ^c  

^a Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c SpikeNet Technology SARL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; LEARNING; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; LEARNING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEURONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 68849101118     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.06-08-804     Document Type: Letter

References (50)

1. Abeles, M. (2004). Neuroscience: Time is precious. Science, 304(5670), 523-524.
2. Amari, S., & Arbib, M. (1977). Systems neuroscience. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Bi, G., & Poo, M. (1998). Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci., 18(24), 10464-10472.
4. Bi, G., & Poo, M. M. (2001). Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 24, 139-166.
5. Cassenaer, S., & Laurent, G. (2007). Hebbian STDP in mushroom bodies facilitates the synchronous flow of olfactory information in locusts. Nature, 448(7154), 709-713.
6. Coultrip, R., Granger, R., & Lynch, G. (1992). A cortical model of winner-take-all competition via lateral inhibition. Neural Networks, 5, 47-54.
7. Crouzet, S., Thorpe, S., & Kirchner, H. (2007). Category-dependent variations in visual processing time. Journal of Vision, 7, 922a.
8. Delorme, A., Perrinet, L., Thorpe, S., & Samuelides, M. (2001). Networks of integrate-and-fire neurons using rank order coding B: Spike timing dependent plasticity and emergence of orientation selectivity. Neurocomputing, 38-40, 539-545.
9. Elias, S., & Grossberg, S. (1975). Pattern formation, contrast control, and oscillations in the short term memory of shunting on-center off-surround networks. Biol. Cyb., 20, 69-98.
10. Feldman, D. (2000). Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex. Neuron, 27(1), 45-56.
11. Fellous, J. M., Tiesinga, P. H., Thomas, P. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2004). Discovering spike patterns in neuronal responses. J. Neurosci., 24(12), 2989-3001.
12. Finelli, L. A., Haney, S., Bazhenov, M., Stopfer, M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2008). Synaptic learning rules and sparse coding in a model sensory system. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4(4), e1000062.
13. Frostig, R. D., Frostig, Z., & Harper, R. M. (1990). Recurring discharge patterns in multiple spike trains. Biol. Cybern., 62(6), 487-493.
14. Gerstner, W., Kempter, R., van Hemmen, J. L., & Wagner, H. (1996). A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature, 383(6595), 76-81.
15. Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. (2002). Spiking neuron models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gerstner, W., Ritz, R., & van Hemmen, J. L. (1993). Why spikes? Hebbian learning and retrieval of time-resolved excitation patterns. Biol. Cybern., 69(5-6), 503-515.
17. Gütig, R., & Sompolinsky, H. (2006). The tempotron: A neuron that learns spike timing-based decisions. Nat. Neurosci., 9(3), 420-428.
18. Guyonneau, R., VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. (2004). Temporal codes and sparse representations: A key to understanding rapid processing in the visual system. J. Physiol. Paris., 98(4-6), 487-497.
19. Guyonneau, R., VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. (2005). Neurons tune to the earliest spikes through STDP. Neural Comput., 17(4), 859-879.
20. Hosaka, R., Araki, O., & Ikeguchi, T. (2008). STDP provides the substrate for igniting synfire chains by spatiotemporal input patterns. Neural Comput., 20(2), 415-435.
21. Ikegaya, Y., Aaron, G., Cossart, R., Aronov, D., Lampl, I., Ferster, D., et al. (2004). Synfire chains and cortical songs: Temporal modules of cortical activity. Science, 304(5670), 559-564.
22. Izhikevich, E. M. (2006). Polychronization: Computation with spikes. Neural Comput., 18(2), 245-282.
23. Jacob, V., Brasier, D. J., Erchova, I., Feldman, D., & Shulz, D. E. (2007). Spike timing-dependent synaptic depression in the in vivo barrel cortex of the rat. J. Neurosci., 27(6), 1271-1284.
24. Kempter, R., Gerstner, W., & van Hemmen, J. L. (1999). Hebbian learning and spiking neurons. Phys. Rev. E, 59(4), 4498-4514.
25. Knoblich, U., Bouvrie, J., & Poggio, T. (2007). Biophysical models of neural computation: Max and tuning circuits. (Tech.Report). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
26. Kouh, M., & Poggio, T. (2008). A canonical neural circuit for cortical nonlinear operations. Neural Comput., 20(6), 1427-1451.
27. Legenstein, R., Naeger, C., & Maass, W. (2005). What can a neuron learn with spike-timing-dependent plasticity? Neural Comput., 17(11), 2337-2382.
28. Luczak, A., Barthó, P., Marguet, S. L., Buzsáki, G., & Harris, K. D. (2007). Sequential structure of neocortical spontaneous activity in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104(1), 347-352.
29. Maass, W. (2000). On the computational power of winner-take-all. Neural Comput., 12(11), 2519-2535.
30. Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M., & Sakmann, B. (1997). Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APS and EPSPS. Science, 275(5297), 213-215.
31. Masquelier, T. (2008). Learning mechanisms to account for the speed, selectivity and invariance of responses in the visual cortex. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse 3.
32. Masquelier, T., Guyonneau, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2008). Spike timing dependent plasticity finds the start of repeating patterns in continuous spike trains. PLoS ONE, 3(1), e1377.
33. Masquelier, T., & Thorpe, S. J. (2007). Unsupervised learning of visual features through spike timing dependent plasticity. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3(2), e31.
34. Mehta, M. R., Quirk, M. C., & Wilson, M. A. (2000). Experience-dependent asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields [see comments]. Neuron, 25(3), 707-715.
35. Meliza, C. D., & Dan, Y. (2006). Receptive-field modification in rat visual cortex induced by paired visual stimulation and single-cell spiking. Neuron, 49(2), 183-189.
36. Mu, Y., & Poo, M. M. (2006). Spike timing-dependent LTP/LTD mediates visual experience-dependent plasticity in a developing retinotectal system. Neuron, 50(1), 115-125.
37. Pfister, J., & Gerstner, W. (2006). Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timingdependent plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(38), 9673-9682.
38. Prut, Y., Vaadia, E., Bergman, H., Haalman, I., Slovin, H., & Abeles, M. (1998). Spatiotemporal structure of cortical activity: Properties and behavioral relevance. J. Neurophysiol., 79(6), 2857-2874.
39. Rolston, J. D., Wagenaar, D. A., & Potter, S. M. (2007). Precisely timed spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity in dissociated cortical cultures. Neuroscience, 148(1), 294-303.
40. Song, S., Miller, K., & Abbott, L. (2000). Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nat. Neurosci., 3(9), 919-926.
41. Thorpe, S. (1990). Spike arrival times: A highly efficient coding scheme for neural networks. In R. Eckmiller, G. Hartmann, & G. Hauske (Eds.), Parallel processing in neural systems and computers (pp. 91-94). Dordrecht: Elsevier.
42. Thorpe, S., Crouzet, S., Kirchner, H., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2006). Ultra-rapid face detection in natural images: Implications for computation in the visual system. In Proceedings of the First French Conference on Computational Neurosciences (pp. 124-127). Ponta Mousson, France.
43. Tiesinga, P., Fellous, J.-M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2008). Regulation of spike timing in visual cortical circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 9(2), 97-107.
44. VanRossum, M., Bi, G., & Turrigiano, G. (2000). Stable Hebbian learning from spike timing-dependent plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(23), 8812-8821.
45. Vislay-Meltzer, R. L., Kampff, A. R., & Engert, F. (2006). Spatiotemporal specificity of neuronal activity directs the modification of receptive fields in the developing retinotectal system. Neuron, 50(1), 101-114.
46. Yoshioka, M. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent learning rule to encode spatiotemporal patterns in a network of spiking neurons. Phys.Rev.E.Stat.Nonlin.Soft. Matter Phys., 65(1 Pt. 1), 011903.
47. Young, J. M., Waleszczyk, W. J., Wang, C., Calford, M. B., Dreher, B., & Obermayer, K. (2007). Cortical reorganization consistent with spike timing-but not correlation-dependent plasticity. Nat. Neurosc., 10(7), 887-895.
48. Yu, A. J., Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2002). Biophysiologically plausible implementations of the maximum operation. Neural Comp., 14(12), 2857-2881.
49. Yuille, A. L., & Grzywacz, N. M. (1989). A winner-take-all mechanism based on presynaptic inhibition feedback. Neural Comp., 1(3), 334-347.
50. Zhang, L., Tao, H., Holt, C., Harris, W., & Poo, M. (1998). A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses. Nature, 395(6697), 37-44.