The social order of open source software production

Handbook of Research on Open Source Software: Technological, Economic, and Social Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 168-182

  Gläser, Jochen ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68849099046     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-999-1.ch014     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase's penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal, 112, 369-446.
2. Bergquist, M., & Ljungberg, J. (2001). The power of gifts: Organizing social relationships in open source communities. Information Systems Journal, 11, 305-320.
3. Bezroukov, N. (1999). Open source software development as a special type of academic research (critique of vulgar Raymondism). First Monday, 4. Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_10/bezroukov/index.html
4. Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2003). Why open source software can succeed. Research Policy, 32, 1243-1258.
5. Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory, 19, 1-23.
6. th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI.
7. Dalle, J.-M., David, P. A., Ghosh, R. A., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2004). Advancing economic research on the free and open source software mode of production (SIEPR Discussion Paper 04-03). Stanford: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
8. Dalle, J.-M., & Jullien, N. (2003). "Libre" software: Turning fads into institutions? Research Policy, 32, 1-11.
9. Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2003). Neither market nor hierarchy or network: The emerging bazaar governance. Retrieved from http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/demillecocq.pdf
10. De Souza, C., Froehlich, J., & Dourish, P. (2005). Seeking the source: Software source code as a social and technical artifact. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2005) (pp. 197-206).
11. Edwards, K. (2001). Epistemic communities, situated learning and open source software development. Retrieved from http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/kasperedwards-ec.pdf
12. Gacek, C., & Arief, B. (2004). The many meanings of open source. IEEE Software, 21, 34-40.
13. Gallivan, M. J. (2001). Striking the balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Information Systems Journal, 11, 277-304.
14. Garzarelli, G., & Galoppini, R. (2003). Capability coordination in modular organization: Voluntary FS/OSS production and the case of Debian GNU/Linux. In Economics Working Paper Archive at WUST, Industrial Organization. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/garzarelligaloppini.pdf
15. Gasser, L., & Ripoche, G. (2003). Distributed collective practices and free/open-source software problem management: Perspectives and methods. Paper presented at the 2003 Conference on Cooperation, Innovation & Technologies (CITE2003). Retrieved from http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~gasser/papers/cite-gasser.pdf
16. Ghosh, R. A. (1998). Cooking pot markets: An economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the Internet. First Monday, 3. Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_3/ghosh/index.html
17. Ghosh, R. A., & Prakash, V. V. (2000). The Orbiten free software survey. Retrieved from http://www.orbiten.org/ofss/01.html
18. Gläser, J. (2001, December). "Producing communities" as a theoretical challenge. Paper presented at the TASA 2001 Conference, Sydney, Australia.
19. Gläser, J. (2006). Wissenschaftlich produktionsgemeinschaften: Die soziale ordnung der forschung. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus, im Erscheinen.
20. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35, 519-530.
21. Hayek, F. A. (1991). Spontaneous ("grown") order and organized ("made") order. In G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Markets, hierarchies and networks: The coordination of social life (pp. 293-301). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
22. Healy, K., & Schussman, A. (2003). The ecology of open-source software development. Retrieved from http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/healyschussman.pdf
23. Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social: On the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Hess, D. J. (2005). Technology- and productoriented movements: Approximating social movement studies and science and technology studies. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 30, 515-535.
25. Holck, J., & Jørgensen, N. (2005). Do not check in on red: Control meets anarchy in two open source projects. In S. Koch (Ed.), Free/open source software development (pp. 1-25). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
26. Hollingsworth, J. R., & Boyer, R. (1997). Coordination of economic actors and social systems of production. In J. R. Hollingsworth & R. Boyer (Eds.), Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Holtgrewe, U., & Werle, R. (2001). De-commodifying software? Open source software between business strategy and social movement. Science Studies, 14, 43-65.
28. Iannacci, F. (2003). The Linux management model. Retrieved from http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/iannacci2.pdf
29. Jørgensen, N. (2001). Putting it all in the trunk: Incremental software development in the FreeBSD open source project. Information Systems Journal, 11, 321-336.
30. Knorr-Cetina, K., & Merz, M. (1997). Floundering or frolicking: How does ethnography fare in theoretical physics? (And what sort of ethnography?) A reply to Gale and Pinnick. Social Studies of Science, 27, 123-131.
31. Koch, S., & Schneider, G. (2002). Effort, cooperation and co-ordination in an open source software project: GNOME. Information Systems Journal, 12, 27-42.
32. th EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen, Denmark.
33. Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 197-234.
34. Lindblom, C. E. (1965). The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment. New York: The Free Press.
35. MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., & Baldwin, C. (2004). Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Unpublished manuscript.
36. Mayntz, R. (1993). Policy-netzwerke und die logik von verhandlungssystemen. In A. Héritier (Ed.), Policy-analyse: Kritik und neuorientierung (pp. 39-56). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
37. Mayntz, R. (2004). Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 237-259.
38. Merz, M., & Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Deconstruction in a "thinking" science: Theoretical physicists at work. Social Studies of Science, 27, 73-111.
39. Mockus, A., Fielding, R. T., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2002). Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11, 309-346.
40. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
41. Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12, 23-49.
42. Robles, G., Scheider, H., Tretkowski, I., & Weber, N. (2001). Who is doing it? A research on Libre software developers. Retrieved from http://widi.berlios.de/paper/study.html
43. Scacchi, W. (2002). Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. IEE Proceedings: Software, 149, 24-39.
44. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45. Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46. Seiferth, C. J. (1999). Open source and these United States. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12, 50-79.
47. Sharma, S., Sugumeran, V., & Rajagopalan, B. (2002). A framework for creating hybrid-open source software communities. Information Systems Journal, 12, 7-25.
48. Simon, H. A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 25-44.
49. Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialities. Science Studies, 4, 17-40.
50. Star, S. L. (1993). Cooperation without consensus in scientific problem solving: Dynamics of closure in open systems. S. Easterbrook (Ed.), CSCW: Cooperation or conflict? (pp. 93-106). London: Springer.
51. Tuomi, I. (2001). Internet, innovation, and open source: Actors in the network. First Monday, 6. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_1/tuomi/index.html
52. Van Raan, A. F. J. (1990). Fractal dimension of co-citations. Nature, 347, 626.
53. Von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the "private-collective" innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14, 209-223.
54. Von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003). Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 32, 1217-1241.
55. Von Krogh, G., & von Hippel, E. (2003). Editorial: Special issue on open source software development. Research Policy, 32, 1149-1157.
56. th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI. Retrieved from http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/westomahony.pdf
57. Yu, L., Schach, S. R., Chen, K., & Offutt, J. (2004). Categorization of common coupling and its application to the maintainability of the Linux kernel. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30, 694-706.
58. Zeitlyn, D. (2003). Gift economies in the development of open source software: Anthropological reflections. Research Policy, 32, 1287-1291.