Molecular confirmation of pathological specimen integrity in Australasia

Pathology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 280-283

  Bell, Christopher G ^a   Wood, Daniel R ^a   Cheong, Sarah J H ^a   Kwan, Edward ^a   Sinosich, Mike ^a   Delprado, Warick ^a   Baumgart, Karl W ^a  

^a DOUGLASS HANLY MOIR PATHOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Human identification; Microsatellite; Sample integrity

Indexed keywords

AMELOGENIN; DNA; GENOMIC DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND; AUTOSOME; BLOOD SAMPLING; CONFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOLECULAR IMPRINTING; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; BIOPSY; DNA FINGERPRINTING; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL ERROR; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; STANDARD;

AUSTRALASIA; BIOPSY; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PATHOLOGY, SURGICAL; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 68849093184     PISSN: 00313025     EISSN: 14653931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00313020902756311     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Valenstein PN, Raab SS, Walsh MK. Identification errors involving clinical laboratories: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of patient and specimen Identification errors at 120 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130: 1106-1113
2. Leong AS, Braye S, Bhagwandeen B. Diagnostic 'errors' in anatomical pathology: relevance to Australian laboratories. Pathology 2006; 38: 490-497
3. Worsham MJ, Wolman SR, Zarbo RJ. Molecular approaches to Identification of tissue contamination in surgical pathology sections. J Mol Diagn 2001; 3: 11-15
4. Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 691-698
5. Suba EJ, Pfeifer JD, Raab SS. Patient Identification error among prostate needle core biopsy specimens--are we ready for a DNA timeout? J Urol 2007; 178: 1245-1248
6. Trpkov K. Editorial comment on: systematic assessment of the ability of the number and percentage of positive biopsy cores to predict pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 743-744
7. Mariappan MR, Zehnder J, Arber DA, Lay M, Fadare O, Schrijver I. Identification of mislabeled specimen by molecular methods: case report and review. Int J Surg Pathol 2005; 13: 253-258
8. Popiolek DA, Prinz MK, West AB, Nazzaruolo BL, Estacio SM, Budimlija ZM. Multiplex DNA short tandem repeat analysis. A useful method for determining the provenance of minute fragments of formalin- fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 120: 746-751
9. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 1991; 10: 506-513
10. Sinclair K, McKechnie VM. DNA extraction from stamps and envelope flaps using QIAamp and QIAshredder. J Forensic Sci 2000; 45: 229-230
11. Castella V, Dimo-Simonin N, Brandt-Casadevall C, Mangin P. Forensic evaluation of the QIAshredder/QIAamp DNA extraction procedure. Forensic Sci Int 2006; 156: 70-73
12. Ayres KL, Chaseling J, Balding DJ. Implications for DNA Identification arising from an analysis of Australian forensic databases. Forensic Sci Int 2002; 129: 90-98
13. Lins AM, Micka KA, Sprecher CJ, et al. Development and population study of an eight-locus short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex system. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43: 1168-1180
14. Applied Biosystems. AmpFlSTR Identi.ler PCR Amplification Kit User's Manual: Allele Frequencies Tables. Carlsbad, CA: Applied Biosystems, 2006.
15. Parameswaran P, Jalili R, Tao L, et al. A pyrosequencing-tailored nucleotide barcode design unveils opportunities for large-scale sample multiplexing. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: e130.