The role of disaggregation of asset values in flood loss estimation: A comparison of different modeling approaches at the mulde river, Germany

Environmental Management

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 524-541

  Wünsch, Anja ^a   Herrmann, Ulrich ^a   Kreibich, Heidi ^a   Thieken, Annegret H ^b,c  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^c AlpS Centre for Natural Hazard   (Austria)

Author keywords

Census data; Disaggregation; Flood loss modeling; Germany; LULC data; Meso scale; Residential building loss

Indexed keywords

CENSUS DATA; DISAGGREGATION; FLOOD LOSS MODELING; GERMANY; LULC DATA; MESO SCALE; RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOSS;

BUILDINGS; ESTIMATION; POPULATION STATISTICS; SURVEYS;

APARTMENT HOUSES;

BUILDING; CENSUS; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FLOOD DAMAGE; MAPPING METHOD; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VALUATION;

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOOD TIDE; GERMANY; LAND USE; MODEL; RIVER; TECHNIQUE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; FLOODS; GERMANY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RIVERS;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; MULDE RIVER; SAXONY-ANHALT;

EID: 68849092058     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9335-3     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. H Apel GT Aronica H Kreibich A Thieken 2009 Flood risk assessments-how detailed do we need to be? Natural Hazards 49 1 79 98
2. Beyene M (2000) Abschätzung von Hochwasserschadenspotentialen-Ein Beitrag zum nachhaltigen Hochwasserschutz [Estimation of flood loss potentials-a contribution to sustainable flood protection]. In: Deutsch M, Pörtge KH, Teltscher H (eds) Beiträge zum Hochwasser/Hochwasserschutz in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Erfurter Geographische Studien 9:219-236
3. BKG GEODATENZENTRUM [Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy] (2005) ATKIS-Basis-DLM
4. R Blong 2003 A new damage index Natural Hazards 30 1 1 23
5. B Büchele H Kreibich A Kron A Thieken J Ihringer P Oberle B Merz F Nestmann 2006 Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 6 485 503
6. K Chen J McAneney R Blong R Leigh L Hunter C Magill 2004 Defining area at risk and its effect in catastrophe loss estimation: a dasymetric mapping approach Applied Geography 24 97 117
7. DLR-DFD [German Aerospace Center-German Remote Sensing Data Center] and UBA [The Federal Environment Agency] (2000) CORINE Land Cover 2000. Daten zur Bodenbedeckung-Deutschland [Data on land cover-Germany]. Oberpfaffenhofen, Berlin
8. D Dutta S Herath K Musiake 2003 A mathematical model for flood loss estimation Journal of Hydrology 277 24 49
9. CL Eicher CA Brewer 2001 Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation: implementation and evaluation Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28 2 125 138
10. H Engel 2004 The flood event 2002 in the Elbe River basin: causes of the flood, its course, statistical assessment and flood damages Houille Blanche 6 33 36
11. EU (2007) Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Official Journal of the European Union, L 288, 50:27-34
12. PF Fisher M Langford 1995 Modelling the errors in areal interpolation between zonal systems by Monte Carlo simulation Environment and Planning A 27 2 211 224
13. M Gall BJ Boruff SL Cutter 2007 Assessing flood hazards zones in the absence of digital floodplain maps: comparison of alternative approaches Natural Hazards Review 8 1 1 12
14. Gallego J, Peedell S (2001) Using CORINE land cover information to map population density. Topic Report 6/2001 (Towards agri-environmental indicators). European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, pp 92-103
15. J Ganoulis 2003 Risk-based floodplain management: a case study from Greece International Journal of River Basin Management 1 1 41 47
16. Grabbert J-H (2006) Analyse der schadensbeeinflussenden Faktoren des Hochwassers 2002 und Ableitung eines mesoskaligen Abschätzungsmodells für Wohngebäudeschäden [Analysis of parameters influencing loss during the flood event 2002 and development of a meso-scale estimation model for residential building damages]. Unpublished thesis, University of Potsdam
17. Hultgren T (2004) Raster-based automated dasymetric mapping. UCGIS Assembly 2004, 20-24 Oct. University of Maryland Conference Center, Adelphi
18. Hydrologic Engineering Centre (1998) HEC-FDA flood analysis system. User's manual. CPD-72. USACE
19. HYDROTEC (2001) Hochwasser-Aktionsplan Angerbach [Flood action plan for the river Angerbach]. Teil I: Berichte und Anlagen. National Environmental Agency of the City of Düsseldorf, Aachen, Germany
20. HYDROTEC (2002) Hochwasser-Aktionsplan Lippe [Flood action plan for the river Lippe]. Teil I: Berichte und Anlagen. National Environmental Agency of the City of Lippstadt, Aachen, Germany
21. INFAS GEOdaten (2001) Das DataWherehouse. INFAS GEOdaten GmbH. Bonn. December
22. INFAS GEOdaten (2005) Das DataWherehouse. INFAS GEOdaten GmbH. Bonn. December
23. International Commission for the Protection of the Elbe River (ICPER) (2004) Dokumentation des Hochwassers vom August 2002 im Einzugsgebiet der Elbe [August 2002 Elbe River basin flood documentation]. ICPER, Magdeburg, Germany
24. International Commission for the Protection of the Rhein (ICPR) (2001) Atlas on the risk of flooding and potential damage due to extreme floods of the Rhine. ICPR, Koblenz, Germany
25. L Kleist A Thieken P Köhler M Müller I Seifert D Borst U Werner 2006 Estimation of the regional stock of residential buildings as a basis for comparative risk assessment for Germany Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 6 541 552
26. W Kron 2005 Flood Risk = Hazard • Values • Vulnerability Water International 30 1 58 68
27. D Martin M Langford NJ Tate 2000 Refining population surface models: experiments with Northern Ireland Census Data Transactions in GIS 4 4 343 360
28. Meer U, Mosimann T (2005) Heterogenität von Bodenbasisdaten mittlerer Mastäbe sowie Möglichkeiten zur Optimierung der Daten durch Disaggregierungsverfahren [Heterogeneity of basic soil data on the meso-scale and possibilities to optimize the data by disaggregation methods]. Department of Geography, University of Hannover, Hannover
29. J Mennis 2003 Generating surface models of population using dasymetric mapping Professional Geographer 55 1 31 42
30. Merz B, Thieken A, Kreibich H, Apel H (2006) Quantifizierung ökonomischer Schäden für groräumige Schadensszenarien [Quantification of economic losses for large-scale loss scenarios]. Unpublished final Project Report, Geoforschungszentrum (GFZ), Potsdam
31. Merz B, Didszun J, Ziemke B (2007) RIMAX Risikomanagement extremer Hochwasserereignisse [Risk management of extreme flood events]. Geoforschungszentrum (GFZ), Potsdam
32. Messner F, Meyer V (2006) Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception-challenges for flood damage research. In: Schanze J, Zeman E, Marsalek J (eds) Flood risk management. NATO Sciences Series. IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol 67. Springer, Dordrecht
33. Messner F, Penning-Rowsell EC, Green C, Meyer V, Tunstall SM, van der Veen A (2006) Guidelines for socio-economic flood damage evaluation T9-06-01. UFZ, Leipzig
34. Meyer V (2005) Methoden der Sturmflut-Schadenspotenzialanalyse an der deutschen Nordseeküste [Methods of analysing surge damage potential at the German North Sea coast]. Dissertation, University of Hannover
35. Ministry of the Environment and Conservation, Agriculture and Consumer Protection of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia (MURL) (2000) Hochwasserschadenspotenziale am Rhein in Nordrhein-Westfalen [Flood damage potentials at the river Rhine in North Rhine-Westphalia]. Final Report. MURL, Aachen
36. Mohaupt-Jahr B, Keil M (2004) The CLC 2000 project in Germany and environmental applications of land use information. In: Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt) (ed) CORINE Land Cover 2000 in Germany and Europe and its use for environmental applications. Workshop. January 20-21, Berlin, pp 37-45
37. Munich Re (2007) Zwischen Hoch und Tief-Wetterrisiken in Mitteleuropa. Edition Wissen, Munich Re
38. JR Olsen PA Beling JH Lambert YY Haimes 1998 Input-output economic evaluation of system of levees Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 124 5 237 245
39. Penning-Rowsell E, Johnson C, Tunstall S, Tapsell S, Morris J, Chatterton J, Green C (2003) The benefits of flood and coastal defence: techniques and data for 2003. Flood Hazard Research Centre. Middlesex University, London
40. Penning-Rowsell E, Johnson C, Tunstall S, Tapsell S, Morris J, Chatterton J, Green C (2005) The benefits of flood and coastal risk management. Middlesex University Press, London
41. Pichler A, Deppe T, Jackson V (2009) Risk assessment and risk management: effectiveness and efficiency of non-structural flood risk management measures. CRUE Research Funding Initiative Synthesis Report No I-2009. CRUE, London
42. Reese S, Markau H-J, Sterr H (2003) MERK. Mikroskalige Evaluation der Risiken in überflutungsgefährdeten Küstenniederungen- Abschlussbericht [Microscale risk evaluation of floodprone coastal lowlands-Final Report]. Kiel
43. HJE Rodda 2005 The development and application of a flood risk model for the Czech Republic Natural Hazards 36 1-2 207 220
44. Rose A et al (2007) Benefit-cost analysis of FEMA hazard mitigation grants. Natural Hazards Review 8(4):97-111
45. Saxon Ministry of the Interior (SMI) (2002) Verwaltungsvorschrift des Sächsischen Staatsministeriums des Innern zur Behebung von Hochwasserschäden an Wohngebäuden [Administrative regulation on the compensation of flood damages of residential buildings]. SMI
46. Saxon Relief Bank (SAB) (2005) Schäden durch das Hochwasser 2002. Angaben aus der Fördermitteldatenbank [Damages of the flood 2002. Data from the Compensation Data Bank], February
47. C Scawthorn P Flores N Blais H Seligson E Tate S Chang E Mifflin W Thomas J Murphy Ch Jones M Lawrence 2006 HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment Natural Hazards Review 7 2 72 81
48. Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) [Federal Statistical Agency] 2004. Baupreisindizes November 2003. Statistisches Bundesamt. Fachserie 17, Reihe 4. Wiesbaden
49. AH Thieken T Petrow H Kreibich B Merz 2006 Insurability and mitigation of flood losses in private households in Germany Risk Analysis 26 2 383 395
50. Thieken AH, Kreibich H, Merz B (2006b) Improved modelling of flood losses in private households. In: Kundzewicz Z, Hattermann F (eds) Natural systems and global change. Research Centre for Agriculture and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland, and Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research, Germany, pp 142-150
51. A Thieken M Müller L Kleist I Seifert D Borst U Werner 2006 Regionalisation of asset values for risk analyses Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 6 167 178
52. U Ulbrich T Brücher AH Fink GC Leckebusch A Krüger JG Pinto 2003 The central European floods of August 2002: Part 1. Rainfall periods and flood development Weather 58 371 377
53. A van der Veen C Logtmeijer 2005 Economic hotspots: visualizing vulnerability to flooding Natural Hazards 36 1-2 65 80
54. Wenkel KO, Schulz A (1999) Vom Punkt zur Fläche-das Skalierungs-bzw. Regionalisierungsproblem aus der Sicht der Landschaftsmodellierung [From point to area-the problem of scale and regionalisation in landscape modelling]. In: Steinhardt U, Volk M (eds) Regionalisierung in der Landschaftsökologie: Forschung-Planung-Praxis. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart, Leipzig, pp 19-42
55. HG Wind TM Nierop CJ de Blois JL de Kok 1999 Analysis of flood damages from the 1993 and 1995 Meuse flood Water Resources Research 35 11 3459 3465