The influence of physical habitat, pyrethroids, and metals on benthic community condition in an urban and residential stream in California

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 526-553

  Hall Jr , Lenwood W ^a   Killen, William D ^a   Anderson, Ronald D ^a   Alden III, Raymond W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioassessments; Metals; Physical habitat; Pyrethroids; Residential streams; Urban

Indexed keywords

EID: 68849090472     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: 15497860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030902892521     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amweg EL, Weston DP, You J, et al. 2006. Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California to Tennessee. Environ Sci Tech 40:1700-06
2. Bacey J. 2005. Biological Assessment of Urban and Agricultural Streams in the California Central Valley (Fall 2002 Through Spring 2004). California Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Pesticide Regulation Sacramento, CA, USA
3. Bacey J and Spurlock F. 2007. Biological assessment of urban and agricultural streams in California's Central Valley. Environ Monitor Assess 130:483-93
4. Bailey RC, Norris RH, Reynoldson TB, et al. 2004. Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems: Using the Reference Condition Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA
5. Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Griffith GE, et al. 1996. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J North American Benthological Soc 15:185-211
6. Barbour MT, Gerritson J, Snyder BD, et al. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Wadeable Streams and Rivers. EPA-841-B-99-002. US Environmental Protection Agency,Washington, DC, USA
7. Brown L and May J. 2004. Periphyton and Macroinvertebrate Communities at Five Sites in the San Joaquin River Basin, California during June and September 2001. Report No. 2004-5098. US Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA, USA
8. Buchman MF 1999. NOAA Screening Reference Tables. NOAAHAZMAT Report 99-1. Coastal Protection and Restoration Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
9. Crunkilton RJ, Kleist J, Ramcheck W, et al. 1997. Assessment of the response of aquatic organisms to long-term in-situ exposures to urban runoff. In: Roesner LS (ed), Effects of Watershed Development and Mangement on Aquatic Ecosystem, pp 18-33. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY, USA
10. DiToro DM, Mahony JD, Hansen DJ, et al. 1990. Toxicity of cadmium in sediment: The role of acid volatile sulfide. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:1488-502
11. DiToro DM,Mahony JD, Hansen DJ, et al. 1992. Acid volatile sulfide predicts the acute toxicity of cadmium and nickel in sediments. Environ Sci Tech 26:96-101
12. Fore LS, Karr JR, and Wisseman RW. 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: Evaluating alternative approaches. J N Am Benthol Soc 15:221-31
13. Giddings JM. 2006. Compilation and Evaluation of Aquatic Toxicity Data for Synthetic Pyrethroids. Report. Compliance Services International Study # 06726, Rochester, MA, USA
14. Hall LW Jr and Killen WD. 2001. Characterization of Benthic Communities and Physical Habitat in an Agricultural and Urban Stream in California's Central Valley. Final report prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, MD, USA
15. Hall LW Jr and Killen WD. 2002. Characterization of Benthic Communities and Physical Habitat in Agricultural Streams in California's San Joaquin Valley. Final report prepared by University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, MD, USA
16. Hall LW Jr and Killen WD. 2003. Characterization of Benthic Communities and Physical Habitat in Agricultural Streams in California's San Joaquin Valley in 2002. Final Report prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, MD, USA
17. Hall LW Jr and Killen WD. 2004. Characterization of Benthic Communities and Physical Habitat in Agricultural Streams in California's San Joaquin Valley in 2003. Final Report prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, MD, USA
18. Hall LW Jr and Killen WD. 2005a. Temporal and Spatial Assessment of Water Quality, Physical Habitat and Benthic Communities in an Impaired Stream in California's San Joaquin Valley. J Environ Sci Hlth 40:959-89
19. Hall LW Jr and Killen WD. 2005b. Characterization of Benthic Communities and Physical Habitat in Agricultural Streams in California's San Joaquin Valley in 2004. Final Report prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, MD, USA
20. Hall LW Jr and Killen WD. 2006. Characterization of Benthic Communities and Physical Habitat in Agricultural Streams in California's San Joaquin Valley in 2005. Final Report prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, MD, USA
21. Hall, LW Jr, Killen WD, Anderson RD, et al. 2008. An Assessment of Benthic Communities with Concurrent Physical Habitat, Pyrethroids and Metals Analysis in an Urban And Residential Stream in California in 2006 and 2007. Final report prepared by University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, MD, USA
22. Harrington J. and Born M. 2000. Measuring the Health of California Streams and Rivers. A Methods Manual for Water Resource Professionals, Citizen Monitors and Natural Resource Students. Report. Sustainable Land Stewardship International Institute, Sacramento, CA, USA
23. Karr JR 1998. Rivers as sentinels: Using the biology of rivers to guide landscape management. In: Naiman RJ and Bilby RE (eds), River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion, pp 502-28. Springer, New York, NY, USA
24. Karr JR and Chu EW. 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters-Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press, Covelo, CA, USA
25. Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier PL, et al. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: A method and its rationale. Illinois Natuaral History Survey Special Publication 5, Champaign, IL, USA
26. Kazyak PF. 1997. Maryland Biological Stream Survey Sampling Manual. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Chesapeake Bay Research and Monitoring Division, Annapolis, MD, USA
27. Kleindl WJ. 1995. A Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity for Puget Sound Lowland Streams. Washington USA. MS Thesis. University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA
28. Moulton SR II, Carter JL, Grotheer SA, et al. 2000. Methods of Analysis by the U. S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory-Processing, Taxonomy and Quality Control of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Samples. Report 00-212. US Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA, USA
29. Pettigrove V and Hoffman A. 2003a. Major sources of heavy metal pollution during base flows from sewered urban catchments in the city of Melbourne. Proceedings, Third South Pacific Conference on Stormwater and Aquatic Resource Protection combined with the 10th Annual Conference of the Australian Chapter of the International Erosion Control Association, Ackland, New Zealand, May 14-16
30. Pettigrove V and Hoffman A. 2003b. Toxicity inMelbourne's streams and wetlands: An emerging threat to healthy aquatic ecosystems. Proceedings Australian Water Association Convention and Exhibition. Paper #214. Perth, WA, Australia. April 6-10
31. Plumb RH. 1981. Procedures for Handling and Chemical Analysis of Sediment and Water Samples. US Army Corps of Engineers, US Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA
32. Rankin ET. 1995. Habitat indices in water resource quality assessments. In: Davis WS and Simon TP (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, pp 181-208. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA
33. Rhoades BL. 1995. Stream power: A unifying theme for urban geomorphology. In: Herricks EE (ed), Stormwater Runoff and Receiving Systems Impacts Monitoring and Assessment, pp 65-76. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA
34. Robinson NJ. 2005. Draft Method: Residue Analytical Method for the Determination of Residues of Bifenthrin, Cypermethrin, Cyfluthrin, Deltamethrin, Esfenvalerate, Fenpropathrin, Lambda-Cyhalothrin and Permethrin in Sediment. Report for the Pyrethroid Working Group, Syngenta Crop Protection, Greensboro, NC, USA
35. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. Statistical Analysis Program Version 9.1. Cary, NC, USA.
36. Stribling JB, White JS, Jessup BJ, et al. 1998. Development of a Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity for Maryland Streams. Tetra Tech Incorporated, Owings, MD, USA
37. Tetra Tech Inc. 2003. The status and future of biological assessment for California Streams. Prepared for the California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality, Sacramento, CA, USA
38. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2004. SW-846, Method 9060A: Total Organic Carbon. Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA
39. Weston DP,Holmes RW, You J, et al. 2005a. Aquatic toxicity due to residential use of pyrethroid insecticides. Environ Sci Tech 39:9778-84
40. Weston DP, Holmes RW, and English T. 2005b. A tale of two creeks: An intensive study of pyrethroids and related toxicity in urban environments. Abstract number 378, 26th Annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Baltimore, MD, USA
41. Wright JF, Sutcliffe DW, and Furse MT. 2000. Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwater: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ableside, Cumbria, UK
42. Yoder CO and Rankin ET. 1995. Biological criteria program development and implementation in Ohio. In: Davis WS and Simon TP (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools of Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, 109-44. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA