Case-based reasoning and TRIZ: A coupling for innovative conception in Chemical Engineering

Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 239-249

  Cortes Robles, Guillermo ^a   Negny, Stéphane ^a   Le Lann, Jean Marc ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE GÉNIE CHIMIQUE   (France)

Author keywords

CBR; Chemical process; Inventive design; TRIZ

Indexed keywords

BEST PRACTICE; CBR; CHEMICAL PROCESS; ENGINEERING FIELDS; INVENTIVE DESIGN; INVENTIVE PROBLEMS; INVENTIVE SOLUTIONS; LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION; PRELIMINARY DESIGN; PROBLEM RESOLUTION; PROBLEM SOLVING METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS; ROUTINE DESIGN; TECHNICAL INNOVATION; TRIZ; WORLD MARKET;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BITS; CASE BASED REASONING; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; INNOVATION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

DESIGN;

EID: 68749120809     PISSN: 02552701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2008.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Srinivasan R., and Kraslawski A. Application of the TRIZ creativity enhancement approach to design of inherently safer chemical processes. Chem. Eng. Process. 45 (2006) 507-514
2. Simons H.A. The Sciences of Artificial (1969), Cambridge Press
3. Altshuller G. Creativity as an Exact Science (1984), Gordon & Breach, New York
4. Schank R. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Learning in Computers and People (1982), Cambridge University Press
5. Kolodner J. Case-based Reasoning (1993), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
6. Avramenko Y., and Kraslawski A. Similarity concept for case-based design in process engineering. Comp. Chem. Eng. 30 (2006) 548-557
7. Kraslawski A., Lyssov I., Kudra T., Borowiak M., and Nystrom L. Case based reasoning for equipment selection using rough sets analysis in adaptation phase. Comp. Chem. Eng. Suppl. 23 (1999) 707-710
8. Virkki-Hatakka T., Kraslawski A., Koiranen T., and Nystrom L. Adaptation phase in case based reasoning system for process equipment selection. Comp. Chem. Eng. Suppl. 21 (1997) S643-S648
9. Roda I.R., Poch M., Sanchez-Marre M., Cortes U., and Lafuente J. Consider a case-based system for control of complex processes. Chem. Eng. Prog. (1999) 39-45
10. Surma J., and Braunschweig B. Case-base retrieval in process engineering: supporting design by reusing flowsheets. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 9 4 (1996) 385-391
11. Pajula E., Seuranen T., and Hurme M. Synthesis of separation processes by using case-based reasoning. Comp. Chem. Eng. 25 (2001) 775-782
12. Seuranen T., Hurme M., and Pajula E. Synthesis of separation processes by case-based reasoning. Comp. Chem. Eng. 29 (2005) 1473-1482
13. King J.M.P., Banares Alcantara R., and Manan Z.A. Minimising environmental impact using CBR: an azeotropic distillation case study. Environ. Model. Soft. 14 (1999) 359-366
14. Avramenko Y., Nystrom L., and Kraslawski A. Selection of internals for reactive distillation column-case based reasoning approach. Comp. Chem. Eng. 28 (2004) 37-44
15. Avramenko Y., and Kraslawski A. Decision supporting system for pre-selection of column internals in reactive distillation. Chem. Eng. Process. 44 (2005) 609-616
16. Lopez-Arevalo I., Banares-Alcantara R., Aldea A., Rodriguez-Martinez A., and Jimenez L. Generation of process alternatives using abstract models and case based reasoning. Comp. Chem. Eng. 31 (2007) 902-918
17. Gero J.S. Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11 4 (1990) 26-36
18. Hipple J. Solve problems inventively. Chem. Eng. Prog. 101 4 (2005) 44-50
19. Rantanen K., and Domb E. Simplified TRIZ: New Problem Solving Applications for Engineers and Manufacturing Professionals (2002), St Lucie Press, Boca Raton
20. Domb E. Managing creativity for project success. Proceedings of the 7th Project Leadership Conference (2000)
21. J. Hipple, 40 inventive principles with examples for chemical engineering, 2005 (http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2005/06/index.htm).
22. G. Cortes Robles, S. Negny, J.M. Le Lann, Another vision of the 40 inventive principles with applications in chemical engineering, 2005 (http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2005/12/index.htm).
23. H. Vergnes, Etudes expérimentales et modélisation du réacteur annulaire et de son modèle réduit, Ph.D. Thesis at the I.N.P. Toulouse, 1996.
24. D. Mann, Assessing the accuracy of the contradiction matrix for recent mechanical inventions, 2002 (http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2002/02/e/index.htm).
25. Mann D., Dewulf S., Zlotin B., and Zusman A. Matrix 2003, Updating the Contradiction Matrix (2003), Creax Press, Belgium
26. D. Mann, Comparing the classical and new contradiction matrix. Part 2. Zooming in, 2004 (http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2004/07/index.htm).
27. Estevez I., Dubois S., Gartiser N., Renaud J., and Caillaud E. Le raisonnement à partir de cas est il utilisable pour l'aide à la conception inventive. Proceedings of 14 Atelier de Raisonnement à Partir de Cas Besançon. France (2006) 123-129
28. Braunschweig B., and Irons K. TRIZ and evolution of CAPE tools from flowtran to cape-open and beyond. Eur. Symp. Computer Aided Process Eng. 12 (2002) 859-864
29. B. Busov, D. Mann, P. Jirman, Case studies in TRIZ: a novel heat exchanger (use of function analysis modeling to find and eliminate contradictions), 1999 (http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1999/12/b/index.htm).
30. Li X.N., Rong B.G., and Kraslawski A. TRIZ-based creative retrofitting of complex distillation processes-an industrial case study. Eur. Symp. Computer Aided Process Eng. 11 (2001) 439-444
31. Li X.N., Rong B.G., and Kraslawski A. Synthesis of reactor/separator networks by the conflict based analysis approach. Eur. Symp. Computer Aided Process Eng. 12 (2002) 241-246
32. Hipple J. Use TRIZ in reverse to analyse failures. Chem. Eng. Prog. 101 5 (2005) 48-51
33. Lim Y.I., and Jorgensen S.B. A fast accurate numerical method for solving simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatographic separation problem. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 (2004) 1931-1947
34. Pais L.S., Loureiro J.M., and Rodrigues A.E. Modeling strategies for enantiomers separation by SMB chromatography. AIChE J. 44 3 (1998) 561-569