Combining risks estimations and clinical practice guidelines in a computer decision aid: A pilot study of the EsPeR system

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 95, Issue , 2003, Pages 525-530

  Colombet, Isabelle ^a   Dart, Thierry ^a   Leneveut, Laurence ^a   Zunino, Sylvain ^a   Ménard, Joël ^a   Chatellier, Gilles ^a,b,c  

^a HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Clinical Decision Support system; Clinical practice guideline; Evaluation; Prevention; Risks

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE TESTS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; ERGONOMICS; RISK PERCEPTION; RISKS;

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE- BASED DECISIONS; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; PREVENTION; PREVENTION STRATEGIES; QUALITATIVE EVALUATIONS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 68749108375     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-939-4-525     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Lang T, de Gaudemaris R, Chatellier G, Hamici L, and Diene E, Prevalence and therapeutic control of hypertension in 30,000 subjects in the workplace. Hypertension, 2001; 38:449-54.
2. Ganry 0, Peng J, and Dubreuil A, [Evaluation of mass screening for breast cancer in the Somme district (France) between 1990 and 1996]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique, 1999; 47:335-41.
3. Giorgi R, Gouvernet J, Jougla E, et al., The use of the personalized estimate of death probabilities for medical decision making. Comput Biomed Res, 2000; 33:75-83.
4. Colombet I, Xu Y, Jaulent MC, et al., A generic computerized method for estimate of familial risks. Proc AMIA Symp, 2002:175-9.
5. Dart T, Xu Y, Chatellier G, and Degoulet P, Computerization of guidelines: towards a "guideline markup language". Medinfo, 2001; 10:186-90.
6. Ohno-Machado L, Gennari JH, Murphy SN, et al., The guideline interchange format: A model for representing guidelines. JAm Med Inform Assoc, 1998; 5:357-72.
7. Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, and Kannel WB, An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation, 1991; 83:356-62.
8. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al., Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. JNatl Cancer Inst, 1989; 81:1879-86.
9. Giacomini MK and Cook DJ, Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA, 2000; 284:357-62.
10. Shea S, DuMouchel W, and Bahamonde L, A meta-Analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computerbased clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. JAm Med Inform Assoc,1996;3:399-409.
11. Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N, et al., Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2002; 325:941.
12. Montgomery AA, Fahey T, Peters TJ, MacIntosh C, and Sharp DJ, Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2000; 320:686-90.
13. Kaplan B, Evaluating informatics applications-some alternative approaches: Theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int JMed Inf, 2001; 64:39-56.