Genetic programming-based attenuation relationship: An application of recent earthquakes in turkey

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1884-1896

  Cabalar, Ali Firat ^a   Cevik, Abdulkadir ^a  

^a GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Attenuation relationship; Genetic programming

Indexed keywords

ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIP; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDES; EARTHQUAKE SOURCE; GROUND-MOTION; INPUT VARIABLES; MODEL YIELDS; PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION; SHEAR-WAVE VELOCITY;

DIFFERENTIAL AMPLIFIERS; EARTHQUAKES; PROGRAMMED CONTROL SYSTEMS;

GENETIC PROGRAMMING;

EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GROUND MOTION; MODELING; PEAK ACCELERATION; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC DATA;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 68749103191     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.015     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abrahamson N.A., and Shedlock K.M. Overview. Seismological Research Letters 68 1 (1997) 9-23
2. Atkinson G.M., and Boore D.M. Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to cascadia and other regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93 (2003) 1703-1729
3. Atkinson G.M., and Boore D.M. Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96 (2006) 2181-2205
4. Barka A.A. The north Anatolian fault zone. Annales Tectonicae 6 (1992) 164-195
5. Baziar M.H., and Jafarian Y. Assessment of liquefaction triggering using strain energy concept and ANN model: capacity energy. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 (2007) 1056-1072
6. Bommer J.J. Uncertainty about the uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis. Engineering Geology 70 (2003) 165-168
7. Boore D.M., Joyner W.B., and Fumal T.E. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismological Research Letters 68 1 (1997) 128-153
8. Campbell K.W., and Bozorgnia Y. Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93 (2003) 314-331
9. Chambers L. The Practical Handbook of Genetic Algorithms Applications. second ed. (2001), Chapman & Hall/CRC, USA p. 544
10. Chen S.G., Hu R.F., Chang Y.J., and Tsai I.F. Neural networks for predicting Chi-Chi earthquake induced liquefaction in Yuan-Lin area. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 10 1 (2002) 21-32
11. Dewey J.F., and Sengör A.M.C. Aegean and surrounding regions: complex multi-plate and continuum tectonic in convergent zone. Bulletin of Geological Society of America 90 (1979) 84-92
12. Dewey, J.F., Hempton, M.R., Kidd, W.S.F., Sengör, A.M.C., 1986. Shortening of continental lithosphere; the neotectonics of eastern Anatolia, a young collision zone. In: Coward, M.P. (Ed.), Geological Society Special Publications 19, pp. 3-36.
13. Douglas, J., 2001. A comprehensive worldwide summary of strong-motion attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and spectral ordinates (1969-2000). ESEE Report no. 01-1, Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Civil Engineering Department, London, p. 138.
14. Ellis, G.W., Yao, C., Zhao, R., 1992. Neural network modelling of the mechanical behaviour of sand. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference Engineering Mechanics ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers), New York, pp. 421-424.
15. Erdik, M., Biro, Y., Durukal, E., 2001. Assessment of earthquake hazard in Turkey and neighboring regions. In: Proceedings of the American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2001, abstract #S51D-01, 2001AGUFM.S51D.01E, San Francisco, CA.
16. Erdik M., Demircioglu M., Sesetyan K., Durukal E., and Siyahi B. Earthquake hazard in Marmara region, Turkey. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24 (2004) 605-631
17. Erdik M., Doyuran V., Gülkan P., and Akkas N. A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. Tectonophysics 117 (1985) 295-344
18. Ferreira, C., 2001a. Gene expression programming in problem solving. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, 10-24. 〈http://www.gene-expression-programming.com/author.asp〉.
19. Ferreira C. Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Systems 13 2 (2001) 87-129
20. Ferreira, C., 2002. Gene Expression Programming: Mathematical Modeling by an Artificial Intelligence. Angra do Heroisma, Portugal. 〈http://www.gene-expression-programming.com/author.asp〉.
21. Fletcher R., and Reeves C.M. Function minimization-by conjugate gradients. Computer Journal 7 (1964) 149-154
22. Gepsoft- Modeling made easy-data mining software 〈www.gepsoft.com〉 (accessed 15.07.08).
23. Ghabousi J., Garret Jr. J.H., and Wu X. Knowledge-based modelling of material behaviour with neural networks. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 117 1 (1991) 132-153
24. Goh A.T.C. Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 120 9 (1994) 1467-1480
25. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. first ed. (1989), Addison-Wesley Publishing, Inc., Reading, MA p. 432
26. Gülkan P., and Kalkan E. Attenuation modeling of recent earthquakes in Turkey. Journal of Seismology 6 (2002) 397-409
27. Gülkan P., and Kalkan E. Site-dependent spectra derived from ground-motion records in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra 4 (2004) 1111-1138
28. Güllü H., and Erçelebi E. A neural network approach for attenuation relationships: an application using strong-ground-motion data from Turkey. Engineering Geology 93 (2007) 65-81
29. Hanna A.M., Ural D., and Saygili G. Neural network model for liquefaction potential in soil deposits using Turkey and Taiwan earthquake data. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 6 (2007) 521-540
30. Haupt R.L., and Haupt S.E. Practical Genetic Algorithms. second ed. (2004), Wiley-Interscience, New York p. 272
31. Holland J.H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (1975), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor p. 228
32. Idriss, I.M., 1978. Characteristics of earthquake ground motions. In: Proceedings of the ASCE Conference Earthquake and Soil Dynamic, Pasadena, California, (III). pp. 1151-1265.
33. Joyner, W.B., Boore, D.M., 1988. Measurement, characterization and prediction of strong-ground motion. In: Proceedings of the Earthquake Engineering & Soil Dynamics II ASCE, pp. 43-102.
34. Klügel J.U. Problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants. Engineering Geology 78 (2005) 285-307
35. Koza J.R. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA p. 840
36. Kramer S.L. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering (1996), Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey p. 653
37. Liu, Y., 2001. Genetic programming model for software quality classification. In: Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering, Florida, p. 237.
38. McKenzie D.P. Plate tectonics of Mediterranean region. Nature 226 (1970) 239-243
39. McKenzie D.P. Active tectonics of Mediterranean region. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 30 (1972) 109-185
40. Rathje E.M., Stokoe II K.H., and Rosenblad B. Strong motion station characterization and site effects during the 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra 19 3 (2003) 653-675
41. Reilinger R.E., McClusky S.C., Oral M.B., King R.W., Toksoz M.N., Barka A.A., Kinik I., Lenk O., and Sanli I. Global positioning system measurements at present-day crustal movements in the Arabia-Africa-Eurasia plate collision zone. Journal Geophysics Research 94 (1997) 9983-9999
42. Sadigh K., Chang C.-Y., Egan J.A., Makdisi F., and Youngs R.R. Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismological Research Letters 68 1 (1997) 180-198
43. Sobhaninejad, Gh., Noorzad, A., Ansari, A., 2007. Combination of generalized approximation method (Anfis) and global optimization techniques (Genetic Algorithm) in estimation strong-ground-motion attenuation laws. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Tehran, Iran.
44. Somerville P.G., and Graves R.W. Characterization of earthquake strong ground motion. Pure Applied Geophysics 160 (2003) 1811-1828
45. Toro G.R., Abrahamson N.A., and Schneider J.F. Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismological Research Letters 68 1 (1997) 41-57
46. Ulusay R., Tuncay E., Sonmez H., and Gokceoglu C. An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey. Engineering Geology 74 (2004) 265-291
47. Wang J., and Rahman M.S. Fuzzy neural network models for liquefaction prediction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22 8 (2002) 685-694
48. Wasserman P.D. Neural Computing Theory and Practice (1989), Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York p. 230
49. Westaway R. Kinematics of the middle east and eastern Mediterranean updated. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 12 (2003) 5-46
50. Zafarani Z., Mousavi M., Noorzad A., and Ansari A. Calibration of the specific barrier model to Iranian plateau earthquakes and development of physically based attenuation relationships for Iran. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 7 28 (2008) 550-576
51. Zaré M., and Bard P.Y. Strong motion data set of Turkey: data processing and site classification. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22 (2002) 703-718