Revision in artificial disc replacement

Spine Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 773-775

  Ross, Edward R S ^a  

^a HOPE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; IMPLANT; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 68749092767     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.018     Document Type: Note

References (29)

1. Cunningham B.W., Hu N., Beatson H.J., et al. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures-a biomechanical and clinical perspective. Spine J 9 (2009) 735-743
2. Fernstrom J. Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprosthesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand 355 (1966) 154-159
3. McKenzie A.H. Fernstrom intervertebral disc arthroplasty: a long-term evaluation. Orthop Int 3 (1995) 313-324
4. Reah C. Chapter 4: The History of Artificial Disc Replacement [PhD thesis]. University of Manchester; 2006.
5. Mayer H.M. Degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine; total disc replacement as an alternative to lumbar fusion?. Orthopade 34 (2005) 1007-1020
6. Buttner-Janz K., Schellnack K., Zippel H., et al. Experience and results with the SB Charite lumbar intervertebral endoprosthesis. Arch Klin Med 43 (1988) 1785-1789
7. Griffith S.L., Shelokov A.P., Buttner-Janz K., et al. A multicenter retrospective study of the LINK SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 19 (1994) 1842-1849
8. Van Ooij A., Oner F.C., and Verbout A.J. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 (2003) 369
9. Kurtz S.M., van Ooij A., Ross E.R.S., et al. Clinical significance of polyethylene oxidation for total disc arthroplasty. Trans 53rd Orthop Res Soc 32 (2007) 1130
10. Kurtz S.M., Peloza J., Siskey R., and Villarraga M.L. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Spine J 5 (2005) 344-350
11. McAfee P.C., Geisler F.H., Saiedy S.S., et al. Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE artificial disc. Spine 31 (2006) 1217-1226
12. Moore R.J., Fraser R.D., Vernon-Roberts B., et al. The biologic response to particles from lumbar disc prosthesis. Spine 27 (2002) 2088-2094
13. Geisler F.H., Blumenthal S.L., and Guyer R.D. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. J Neurosurg Spine 1 (2004) 143-154
14. Gumbs A.A., Shah R.V., and Yue J.J. The open anterior paramedian retroperitoneal approach for spine procedures. Arch Surg 140 (2005) 339-343
15. Sasso R.C., Kenneth-Burkus J., and LeHuec J. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine 28 (2003) 1023-1026
16. Daly K.J., Ross E.R.S., Norris H., and McCollum C.N. Vascular complications of prosthetic inter-vertebral discs. Eur Spine J 15 Suppl 5 (2006) S644-S649
17. An H.S., and Masuda K. Relevance of in vitro and in vivo models for intervertebral disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg 88-A Suppl 5 (2006)
18. David T. Revision of a Charite artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charite artificial disc: case report and explant analysis. Eur Spine J 14 (2005) 507-511
19. Fraser R.D., Ross E.R., Lowery G.L., et al. Acroflex design and results. Spine J 29 (2004) 1059-1065
20. Putzier M., Funk J.F., and Schneider S.V. Charite total disc replacement-clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15 (2006) 183-195
21. Cinotti G., David T., and Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Spine 21 (1996) 995-1000
22. David T. Lumbar disc prosthesis. Eur Spine J 1 (1993) 254-259
23. Lemaire J.P., Skalli W., Lavaste F., et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337 (1997) 64-76
24. Shelokov A, Ahrens JE, Zeegers W, et al. Average six year followup for patients with artificial disc prosthesis. Paper presented at: North American Spine Society, 12th Annual Meeting; October 22-25, 1997; New York, NY.
25. Zeegers W.S., Bohnen L.M., Laaper M., and Verhaegen M.J. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8 (1999) 210-217
26. Enker P., Steffee A., McMillin C., et al. Artificial disc replacement. Preliminary report with a 3-yr minimum follow-up. Spine 18 (1993) 1061-1070
27. Steffee A.D. The Steffee artificial disc. Clinical efficacy and outcome in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain (1992), Raven Press, New York 245-256
28. Serhan H, Ross ER, Lowery GL, et al. Biomechanical characterisation of a new lumbar disc prosthesis. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine; June 19-23, 2001; Edinburgh.
29. Zdrahala R.J., and Zdrahala I.J. Biomedical applications of polyurethanes: a review of past promises, present realities, and a vibrant future. J Biomater Appl 14 (1999) 67-90