Improving web search by categorization, clustering, and personalization

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5139 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 659-666

  Zhu, Dengya ^a   Dreher, Heinz ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clustering; Personalization; Text categorization; Web searching; Web snippets

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

CLUSTERING; PERSONALIZATIONS; TEXT CATEGORIZATION; WEB SNIPPETS; WEB-SEARCHING;

DATA MINING;

EID: 68749092231     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88192-6_69     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Gauch, S., Chaffee, J., Pretschner, A.: Ontology-based personalized search and browsing. Web intelligence and Agent System 1, 219-234 (2003)
2. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by latent semantic indexing. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41, 391-407 (1990)
3. Montebello, M.: Information Overload-An IR Problem? In: Proceedings of String Processing and Information Retrieval: A South American Symposium, pp. 65-74. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)
4. Zhu, D., Dreher, H.: IR Issues for Digital Ecosystems Users. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference, pp. 586-591. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)
5. Chirita, P.-A., Nejdl, W., Paiu, R., Kohlschütter, C.: Using ODP Metadata to Personalize Search. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 178-185. ACM Press, New York (2005)
6. Godoy, D., Amandi, A.: Modeling user interests by conceptual clustering. Inform. Syst. 31, 247-265 (2006)
7. Sebastiani, F.: Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. 34, 1-47 (2002)
8. Jain, A.K., Murty, M.N., Flynn, P.J.: Data Clustering: A Review. ACM Comput. Surv. 31, 264-323 (1999)
9. Yang, Y.: An Evaluation of Statistical Approaches to Text Categorization. Inform. Retrieval 1, 69-90 (1999)
10. Zhu, D.: Improving the Relevance of Search Results via Search-term Disambiguation and Ontological Filtering. School of Information Systems, Curtin Business School, Master. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, pp. 235 (2007)
11. Mizzaro, S.: Relevance: The Whole History. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 48, 810-832 (1997)
12. Pitkow, J., Schütze, H., Cass, T., Cooley, R., Turnbull, D., Edmonds, A., Adar, E., Breuel, T.: Personalized Search: A contextual computing approach may prove a breakthrough in personalized search efficiency. Commun. ACM 45, 50-55 (2002)
13. Tsymbal, A.: The problem of concept drift: definitions and related work. Technical report, Trinity College Dublin (2004)
14. Webb, G.I., Pazzani, M.J., Billsus, D.: Machine Learning for User Modeling. User Model User-Adap. 11, 19-29 (2001)
15. Shen, X., Tan, B., Zhai, C.: Privacy Protection in Personalization Search. ACM SIGIR Forum 41, 4-17 (2007)
16. Smith, B.: Ontology. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pp. 155-166. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)
17. Klas, C.-P., Fuhr, N.: A New Effective Approach for Categorizing Web Documents. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group (BCSIGSG 2000) (2000)
18. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval. Inform. Process. Manag. 24, 513-523 (1988)
19. Hemayati, R., Meng, W., Yu, C.: Semantic-based Grouping of Search Engine Results Using WordNet. In: Dong, G., Lin, X., Wang, W., Yang, Y., Yu, J.X. (eds.) APWeb/WAIM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4505, pp. 678-686. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
20. Zhu, D., Dreher, H.: An Integrating Text Retrieval Framework for Digital Ecosystems Paradigm. In: Proceedings of the Inaugural IEEE Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference, pp. 367-372. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)
21. Hearst, M.A., Pedersen, J.O.: Reexamining the Cluster Hypothesis: Scatter/Gather on Retrieval Results. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM/SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 76-84. ACM Press, New York (1996)
22. Zamir, O., Etzioni, O.: Grouper: A Dynamic Clustering Interface to Web Search Results. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW8), pp. 283-296. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)
23. Zeng, H.-J., He, Q.-C., Chen, Z., Ma, W.-Y., Ma, J.: Learning to Cluster Web Search Results. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 210-217. ACM Press, New York (2004)
24. Arasu, A., Cho, J., Garcia-Molina, H., Paepcke, A., Raghavan, S.: Searching the Web. ACM Trans. Inter. Tech. 1, 2-43 (2001)
25. Meng, W., Yu, C., Liu, K.-L.: Building Efficient and Effective Metasearch Engines. ACM Comput. Surv. 34, 48-89 (2000)
26. Mladenic, D., Grobelnik, M.: Feature selection on hierarchy of web documents. Decis. Support Syst. 35, 45-87 (2003)
27. Gospodnetić, O., Hatcher, E.: Lucene In Action. Manning Publications, Greenwich (2005)
28. Zhu, D., Dreher, H.: Personalized Information Retrieval in Digital Ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference, pp. 580-585. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)
29. Zhu, D.: RIB: A Personalized Ontology-based Categorization/Clustering Approach to Improve the Relevance of Web Search Results. In: Proceedings of Curtin Business School Doctorial Colloquium. Curtin University of Technology, Perth (2007)