Journal quality: A Google Scholar analysis

Australasian Marketing Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 150-153

  Soutar, Geoffrey N ^a   Murphy, Jamie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Citations; g Index; h Index; Journal ranking; Research quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749089532     PISSN: 14413582     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., Wang, L., 2006. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(7). .
2. Baumgartner H., and Pieters R. The structural influence of marketing journals: a citation analysis of the discipline and its sub-areas over time. Journal of Marketing 67 2 (2003) 123-139
3. Geuna A., and Martin B. University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison. Minerva 41 4 (2003) 277-304
4. Easton G., and Easton D. Marketing journals and the research assessment exercise. Journal of Marketing Management 19 1/2 (2003) 5-24
5. Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 69 1 (2006) 131-152
6. Guidry J., Hollier B., Johnson L., Tanner J., and Veltsos C. Surveying the cites: a ranking of marketing journals using citation analysis. Marketing Education Review 14 1 (2004) 45-59
7. Harzing, A.W., 2007. Publish or Perish Version 2.0.2673 (Software). .
8. Harzing A.W., and van der Wal R. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (2008) 61-63
9. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (2005) 16569-16572
10. Hult G.T.M., Neese W.T., and Bashaw R.E. Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education 19 1 (1997) 37-52
11. Jacsó P. Google Scholar: the pros and the cons. Online Information Review 29 2 (2006) 208-214
12. King D.A. The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430 6997 (2004) 311-316
13. Murphy J., and Law R. Google Scholar visibility and tourism journals. Annals of Tourism Research 34 3 (2008) 1078-1082
14. Murphy, J., Soutar, G.N., Lee, R., Swilley, E., 2007. Online visibility: a complementary way to rank marketing journals. In: Paper Presented at the AMA Summer Conference.
15. Pauly D., and Stergiou K.I. Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI's citation index and Google's Scholar service. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 5 (2005) 33-35
16. Razzaque, M.A., Wilkinson, I.F., 2007. Research performance of senior level marketing academics in the Australian universities: an exploratory study based on citation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ANZMAC Conference. Dunedin, New Zealand, pp. 3281-3286.
17. Swan, A., Brown, S., 2005. Open access self-archiving, pp. 1-104. An author study. Retrieved from eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10999/01/jisc2.pdf.
18. Soutar, G.N., 2007. Citation benchmarks for article published by Australian marketing academics. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ANZMAC Conference. Dunedin, New Zealand, pp. 3515-3520.
19. Sullivan-Mort G., McColl-Kennedy J.R., Kiel G., and Soutar G.N. Perceptions of marketing journals by senior academics in Australia and New Zealand. Australasian Marketing Journal 12 2 (2004) 51-61
20. Vargo S.L., and Lusch R.F. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68 1 (2004) 1-17
21. Yeung T.A. Deciphering citations. Environment and Planning A 34 12 (2002) 2093-2106