SECCO: On building semantic links in peer-to-peer networks

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5480 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 1-36

  Pirrò, Giuseppe ^a   Ruffolo, Massimo ^b   Talia, Domenico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

^b Exeura Srl   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ontology mapping in Peer to Peer networks; Semantic mapping; Semantic P2P applications; Semantic web

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX MAPPING; CONTENT SHARING; GRAPH MATCHINGS; LINGUISTIC INFORMATION; MANDATORY REQUIREMENT; ON THE FLIES; ONTOLOGY MAPPING; ONTOLOGY MAPPING IN PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS; P2P APPLICATIONS; PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS; QUERY ROUTING; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; SEMANTIC LINK; SEMANTIC MAPPING; SEMANTIC QUERY; SHOW THROUGH; SPECIFIC INTERACTION; STRUCTURAL MAPPING;

CONFORMAL MAPPING; INTEROPERABILITY; LABELS; ONTOLOGY; PATTERN MATCHING; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 68749088825     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00685-2_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. Aberer, K., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Hauswirth, M., Van Pelt, T.: GridVine: Building internetscale semantic overlay networks. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 107-121. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
2. Aberer, K., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Hauswirth, M.: The Chatty Web: Emergent Semantics Through Gossiping. In: Proc. of WWW 2003, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 197-206 (2003)
3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (2001)
4. Berners-Lee, T.: The Semantic Web: An interview with Tim Berners-Lee. Consortium Standards Bulletin 4(6) (June 2005)
5. Berkovsky, S., Eytani, Y., Gal, A.: Measuring the relative performance of schema matchers. In: Proc. of WI 2005, Compeigne, France, pp. 366-371 (2005)
6. Bethea, W.L., Fink, C.R., Beecher-Deighan, J.S.: JHU/APL Onto-Mapology Results for OM 2006. In: Proc. of OAEI 2006, Athens, Georgia, USA (2006)
7. Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., Zanobini, S.: Semantic coordination: a new approach and an application. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 130-145. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
8. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S., Racca, G.: From Surface to Intensive Matching of Semantic web Ontologies. In: Proc. of WEBS 2004, Zaragoza, Spain, pp. 140-144 (2004)
9. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: H-MATCH: an Algorithm for Dynamically Matching Ontologies in Peer-based Systems. In: Proc. of SWDB, Berlin, Germany, pp. 231-250 (2003)
10. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Messa, G.: Results of the HMatch Ontology Matchmaker in OAEI. In: Proc. of OM 2006, Athens, Georgia, USA, pp. 134-143 (2006)
11. Choi, N., Song, I., Han, H.: A survey on Ontology Mapping. SIGMOD Record 35(3), 34-41 (2006)
12. Davies, J., Studer, R., Warren, P. (eds.): Semantic Web Technologies - trends and research in ontology-based systems. Wiley, Chichester (2006)
13. Devore, J.L.: Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. International Thomson Publishing Company
14. Do, H., Rahm, E.: COMA - a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: Proc. of VLDB 2002, Hong Kong, China, pp. 610-621 (2002)
15. Do, H., Melnik, S., Rahm, E.: Comparison of schema matching evaluations. In: Proc. GI-Workshop Web and Databases, Erfurt, Germany, pp. 221-237 (2002)
16. Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: Qom - fast ontology mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 289-303. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
17. Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Ontology mapping - an integrated approach. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 76-91. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
18. Ehrig, M., Tempich, C., Broekstra, J., Van Harmelen, F., Sabou, M., Siebes, R., Staab, S., Stuckenschmidt, H.: SWAP: Ontology-based Knowledge Management with Peer-to-Peer Technology. In: Proc. of WOW, Luzerne, Switzerland (2003)
19. Euzenat, J., Mochol, M., Shvaiko, P., Stuckenschmidt, H., Šváb, O., Svátek, V., van Hage, W.R., Yatskevich, M.: Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2006. In: Proc. of OM 2006, Athens, Georgia, USA (2006)
20. Euzenat, J.: An API for ontology alignment. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 698-712. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
21. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
22. Goble, C.A., De Roure, D.: The Semantic Grid: Myth busting and bridge building. In: Proc. of ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain, pp. 1129-1135 (2004)
23. Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199-220 (1993)
24. Halevy, A.Y., Ives, Z.G., Jayant Madhavan Mork, P., Suciu, D., Tatarinov, I.: Piazza: Data Management Infrastructure for Semantic Web Applications. In: Proc. of WWW 2003, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 556-567 (2003)
25. Hu, W., Cheng, G., Zheng, D., Zhong, X., Qu, Y.: T Results of Falcon-OM in the OAEI, Campaign. In: Proc. of. OM 2006, Athens, Georgia, USA, pp. 124-133 (2006)
26. Java WordNet Similarity Library (JWSL) and the Similarity Experiment, http://grid.deis.unical.it/similarity
27. Jiang, J., Conrath, D.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: Proc. of ROCLING X, Taiwan (1997)
28. Klyne, G., Caroll, J.J.: Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004) (October 2007), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
29. Kotis, K., Valarakos, A., Vouros, G.: AUTOMS: Automated Ontology Mapping through Synthesis of methods. In: Proc. of OM 2006, Athens, Georgia, USA (2006)
30. Lauer, M.: Designing Statistical Language Learners: Experiments on Noun Compounds. In: Proc. of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 1995), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 47-54 (1995)
31. Le Coche, E., Mastroianni, C., Pirrò, G., Ruffolo, M., Talia, D.: A peer-to-peer virtual office for organizational knowledge management. In: Reimer, U., Karagiannis, D. (eds.) PAKM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4333, pp. 166-177. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
32. Levenshtein, I.V.: Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertion and Reversals. Soviet Physics-Doklady 10(8), 707-710 (1966)
33. Lucene - The Apache Lucene project (October 2007), http://lucene.apache. org
34. Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual Correlates of Semantic Similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes 6(1), 1-28 (1991)
35. Miller, G.: WordNet An On-line Lexical Database. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4), 235-312 (1990)
36. Mitra, P., Noy, N.F., Jaiswal, A.R.: OMEN: A Probabilistic Ontology Mapping Tool. In: Proc. of MCN 2004, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 71-83 (2004)
37. Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (October 2007), http://oaei.ontologymatching.org
38. Pan, R., Ding, Z., Yu, Y., Peng., Y.: A Bayesian Network Approach to Ontology Mapping. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 563-577. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
39. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL Web Ontology Language Semantic and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004) (October 2007), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/
40. Patwardhan, S., Pedersen, T.: Using WordNet-based context vectors to estimate the semantic relatedness of concepts. In: Proc. of EACL 2006, workshop, pp. 1-8 (2006)
41. Pirrò, G., Talia, D.: An approach to Ontology Mapping based on the Lucene search engine library. In: Proc. of SWAE 2007, Regensburg, Germany, pp. 407-412 (2007)
42. Qu, Y., Hu, W., Cheng, G.: Constructing Virtual Documents for Ontology Matching. In: Proc. of WWW 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 23-31 (2006)
43. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1995, Montréal, Québec, Canada, pp. 448-453 (1995)
44. Rodgers, J.L., Nicewander, W.A.: Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The Amer. Statistician 42, 59-65 (1988)
45. Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.S.: A Vector Space Model for Automatic Indexing. Communications of the ACM 18(1), 613-620 (1975)
46. Seco, N., Veale, T., Hayes, J.: An intrinsic information content metric for semantic similarity in WordNet. In: Proc. of ECAI, Valencia, Spain, pp. 1089-1090 (2004)
47. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
48. Staab, S., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Semantic Web and Peer-to-Peer. In: Decentralized Management and Exchange of Knowledge and Information. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
49. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Kollias, S.: A string metric for ontology alignment. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 624-637. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
50. Su, X., Gulla, J.A.: An information retrieval approach to ontology mapping. Data & Knowledge Engineering 1(58), 47-69 (2006)
51. Wei, H., Ningsheng, J., Yuzhong, Q., Yanbing, W.: GMO: A Graph Matching for Ontologies. In: Proc. of K-Cap 2005, Banff, Canada, pp. 43-50 (2005)
52. Winkler, W.E.: The state of record linkage and current research problems. In: Statistics of Income Division, vol. (4). Internal Revenue Service Publication (1999)
53. WordNet: a lexical database for the English language (October 2007), http://wordnet.princeton.edu/obtain
54. WordNet-Similarity bibliography (October 2007), http://www.d.umn.edu/ ~tpederse/wnsim-bib/
55. Yi, L., Juanzi, L., Duo, Z., Jie, T.: Result of Ontology Alignment with RiMOM at OAEI 2006. In: Proc. of OM 2006, Athens, Georgia, USA, pp. 181-191 (2006)