Towards a multi-scale computerized bone diagnostic system: 2D micro-scale finite element analysis

Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 733-749

  Podshivalov, L ^a   Holdstein, Y ^a   Fischer, A ^a   Bar Yoseph, P Z ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Bone diagnostic system; Bone micro structure; Micro CT MRI; Multi scale finite elements analysis

Indexed keywords

2D ELASTICITY; BIOMEDICAL COMMUNITY; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS; FE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENTS; HOMOGENIZATION PROCEDURE; MACRO SCALE; MICRO-CT/MRI; MICRO-SCALES; MULTI-SCALE FINITE ELEMENTS ANALYSIS; MULTISCALES; NEW APPROACHES; NON-INVASIVE; TRABECULAR STRUCTURE; TWO DOMAINS;

BONE; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; MAMMALS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 68749084865     PISSN: 10698299     EISSN: 10990887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1214     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. www.boneandjointdecade.org, 2008.
2. Azernikov S, Miropolsky A, Fischer A. Surface reconstruction of freeform objects from 3D camera data based on multiresolution volumetric method. ASME Transactions, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering (JCISE) 2003; 3(4):334-338.
3. Holdstein Y, Fischer A. Reconstruction of volumetric freeform objects using neural networks. The Visual Computer Journal 2008; 24(4):295-302.
4. Azernikov S, Fischer A. A new approach to reverse engineering based on volume warping. ASME Transactions, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering (JCISE) 2006; 6(4):355-363.
5. Weiner S, Wagner HD. The material bone: structure-mechanical function relations. Annual Review of Materials Science 1998; 28:271-298.
6. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Medical Engineering and Physics 1998; 20:92-102.
7. NIH Consensus Development Panel. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Journal of the American Medical Association 2001; 285(6):785-795.
8. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, de Laet CE, Burger H, Seeman E, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam study. Bone 2004; 34(1):195-202.
9. Ho-Le K. Finite element mesh generation methods: a review and classification. Computer-Aided Design 1988; 20(1):27-38.
10. Bar-Yoseph PZ, Mereu S, Chippada S, Kalro VJ. Automatic monitoring of element shape quality in 2D and 3D computational mesh dynamics. Computational Mechanics 2001; 27:378-395.
11. Holdstein Y, Podshivalov L, Fischer A, Bar-Yoseph PZ. A neural network technique for re-meshing of bone micro-structure. Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping. Taylor & Francis Group: Leiria, 2008; 237-241.
12. www.altairhyperworks.com, 2008.
13. Fritzke B. A growing neural gas network learns topologies. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1995; 625-632.
14. Quarteroni A. Domain decomposition and parallel processing for the numerical solution of partial differential equations. Surveys on Mathematics for Industry 1991; 1:75-118.
15. van-Rietbergen B. Micro-FE analyses of bone: state of the art. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2001; 496:21-30.
16. Arbenz P, van Lenthe GH, Mennel U, Muller R, Sala M. Multi-level μ-finite element analysis for human bone structure. Workshop on State-of-the-art in Scientific and Parallel Computing, Umeå, Sweden, 18-21 June 2006.
17. Müller R, Ruegsegger P. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of non-invasively trabecular bone structure. Medical Engineering and Physics 1995; 17(2):126-133.
18. Niebur GL, Feldstein MJ, Yuen JC, Chen TJ, Keaveny TM. High-resolution FE models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 2000; 33:1575-1583.
19. Ruimerman R, Hilbers P, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R. A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. Journal of Biomechanics 2005; 38:931-941.
20. van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Huiskes R, Polman BJW. Computational strategies for iterative solutions of large FEM applications employing voxel data. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1996; 39:2743-2767.
21. Weinan E, Engquist B, Li X, Weiqing R, Vanden-Eijnden E. The heterogeneous multiscale method: a review. Communications in Computational Physics 2007; 2(3):367-450.
22. Brandt A. Multiscale scientific computation: review 2001. In Multiscale and Multiresolution Methods: Theory and Applications, Barth TJ et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Yosemite Educational Symposium Conference, 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 20. Springer: Berlin, 2002; 3-96.
23. Fischer A, Bar-Yoseph PZ. Adaptive mesh generation based on Multiresolution Quadtree representation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 48:1571-1582.
24. Liu WK, Park HS, Qian D, Karpov EG, Kadowaki H, Wagner GJ. Bridging scale methods for nanomechanics and materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(13):1407-1421.
25. Ben Dhia H, Rateau G. The Arlequin method as a flexible engineering design tool. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 52:1442-1462.
26. Kawagai M, Sando A, Takano N. Image-based multi-scale modelling strategy for complex and heterogeneous porous microstructures by mesh superposition method. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 2006; 13:53-69.
27. Mitra S, Parashar M, Browne JC. Distributed adaptive grid hierarchy. User's Guide, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
28. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL. The FEM for Solid and Structural Mechanics (6th edn). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2005; 547-587.
29. Aboudi J. Mechanics of Composite Materials. Studies in Applied Mechanics, vol. 29. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1991; 1-10.
30. Cluni F, Gusella V. Homogenization of non-periodic masonry structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2004; 41:1911-1923.
31. Magoulès F, Rixen D (eds). Domain decomposition methods: recent advances and new challenges in engineering. Special Issue in the Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2007; 196(8):1345-1346.
32. Bendsøe M, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications (2nd edn). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003.
33. Marini LD, Quarteroni A. A relaxation procedure for domain decomposition methods using finite elements. Numerische Mathematik 1989; 55:575-598.
34. www.ansys.com, 2008.
35. Farhat C, Roux FX. A method of finite element tearing and interconnecting and its parallel solution algorithm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1991; 32:1205-1227.
36. Farhat C, Lesoinne M, LeTallec P, Pierson K, Rixen D. FETI-DP: a dual-primal unified FETI method - Part I: a faster alternative to the two-level FETI method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 50:1523-1544.
37. Mandel J, Dohrmann CR. Convergence of a balancing domain decomposition by constraints and energy minimization. Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications 2003; 10(63):639-659.
38. Kamath C. The FETI Level 1 Method: Theory and Implementation. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, 200