A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway

Journal of Marriage and Family

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 465-477

  Wiik, Kenneth Aarskaug ^a   Bernhardt, Eva ^b   Noack, Turid ^a  

^a STATISTICS NORWAY   (Norway)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cohabitation; Commitment; Marriage; Quality; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749084009     PISSN: 00222445     EISSN: 17413737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00613.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amato, P. R. (2007). Transformative processes in marriage: Some thought from a sociologist. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 305 309.
2. Bernhardt, E. (2002). Cohabitation and marriage among young adults in Sweden: Attitudes, expectations and plans. In J. Carling (Ed.), Nordic demography: Trends and differentials (pp. 157 170). Oslo, Norway : Unipub.
3. Bernhardt, E. (2004). Cohabitation or marriage? Preferred living arrangements in Sweden. Sdf puzzle 04/2004. Retrieved December 5, 2008 from http://www.oif.ac.at/sdf/sdf04-04-bernhardt.pdf.
4. Björnberg, U. (2001). Cohabitation and marriage in Sweden: Does family form matter? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 350 362.
5. Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333 355.
6. Brown, S. L. (2003). Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 583 601.
7. Brown, S. L. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality. Social Science Research, 33, 1 19.
8. Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668 678.
9. Clarke-Stewart, A., & Brentano, C. (2006). Divorce: Causes and consequences. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
10. Gähler, M., Hong, Y., & Bernhardt, E. (2009). Parental divorce and union disruption among young adults in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 688 713.
11. Goldstein, J. R., & Harknett, K. (2006). Parenting across racial and class lines: Who are married, cohabiting, dating or no longer romantically involved? Social Forces, 85, 121 143.
12. Hansen, T., Moum T., & Shapiro, A. (2007). Relational and individual well-being among cohabitors and married individuals in midlife: Recent trends from Norway. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 910 933.
13. Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in a comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214 1230.
14. Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 160 177.
15. Kravdal, Ø. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies, 53, 63 80.
16. Kurdek, L. A. (1999). The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality for husbands and wives over the first 10 years of marriage. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1283 1296.
17. Moors, G., & Bernhardt, E. (2009). Splitting up or getting married? The effects of attitudes, evaluations and intentions on transitions among cohabiting couples in Sweden. Acta Sociologica, (in press).
18. Mulder, C., & Smits, J. (1999). First-time home-ownership of couples: The effect of intergenerational transmission. European Sociological Review, 15, 323 337.
19. Noack, T. (2001). Cohabitation in Norway: An accepted and gradually more regulated way of living. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 102 117.
20. Noack, T., & Seierstad, A. (2003). Utviklingen i samliv: Heller jeg enn vi? [The development of unions: Me rather than us?]. Samfunnsspeilet, 17, 19 25.
21. Noack, T., & Wiik, K. A. (2008). Women's choice of surname upon marriage in Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 507 518.
22. Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53 76.
23. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1 20.
24. Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595 608.
25. Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Maybe I do. Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 496 519.
26. Statistics Norway 2008a). Population statistics. Births 2006. Retrieved February 19, 2008, from http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/02/02/10/fodte-en/.
27. Statistics Norway 2008b). Population statistics. Population by age, sex, marital status and citizenship. 1 January 2006. Retrieved February 19, 2008, from http://www.ssb.no/folkemengde/arkiv/tab-2006-03-09-31.html.
28. Statistics Sweden 2003). Evaluation report for the survey Family and working life in the 21st century. Örebro, Sweden : Author.
29. Statistics Sweden 2008). Special calculation from the population statistics. Stockholm : Author.
30. Thomson, E., & Colella, U. (1992). Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 259 267.
31. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
32. Tynes, S. R. (1990). Educational heterogamy and marital satisfaction between spouses. Social Science Research, 19, 153 174.
33. Wiecek, C. (2003). Undersøkelse om fremtidsplaner, familie og samliv - Dokumentasjonsrapport [The new families survey - A documentary report]. Oslo, Norway : Statistics Norway.
34. Wiik, K. A. (2009). You'd better wait! Socioeconomic background and timing of first marriage vs. first cohabitation. European Sociological Review, 25, 139 153.
35. Willetts, M. C. (2006). Union quality comparisons between long-term heterosexual cohabitation and legal marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 110 127.