A note on the modelling of MSY-related parameters when population dynamics are stochastic

Journal of Cetacean Research and Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 183-189

  Punt, André E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Birth rate; Common minke whale; Management procedures; Modelling; Msyr; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BIRTH RATE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION MODELING; STOCHASTICITY; SURVIVAL; WHALE;

BALAENOPTERA ACUTOROSTRATA;

EID: 68649120960     PISSN: 15610713     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Butterworth, D.S. and Punt, A.E. 1999. Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56(6): 985-998
2. Cooke, J.G. 2007. The influence of environmental variability on baleen whale sustainable yield curves. Paper SC/59/RMP10 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 2007, Anchorage, USA (unpublished). 15pp. [Paper available from the Office of this Journal].
3. Francis, R.I.C.C. and Mace, P.M. 2005. An evaluation of some alternative harvest strategies. NZ Fisheries Assessment Report 2005/60. 30pp.
4. International Whaling Commission. 1992. Report of the Scientific Committee, Annex K. Report of the working group on North Atlantic minke whales, Appendix 1. Specifications of the North Atlantic minke trials. Rep. int. Whal. Commit 42:246-251
5. International Whaling Commission. 1994. Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex H. The Revised Management Procedure (RMP) for Baleen Whales. Rep. int. Whal. Commn 44:145-152
6. International Whaling Commission. 1999. Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex N. The Revised Management Procedure (RMP) for Baleen Whales. J. Cetacean Res. Manage.SUPPL1:251-258
7. International Whaling Commission. 2003a. Report of the Scientific Committee. J. Cetacean Res. Manage.SUPPL5:1-92.
8. International Whaling Commission. 2003b. Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex E. Report of the Standing Working Group on the Development of an Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling Management Procedure (AWMP). J. Cetacean Res. Manage.SUPPL5:154-255.
9. International Whaling Commission. 2004. Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex D. Report of the Sub-Committee on the Revised Management Procedure. Appendix 10. North Pacific minke whale Implementation Simulation Trial specifications. J. Cetacean Res. Manage.SUPPL6:118-129
10. International Whaling Commission. 2005a. Report of the Scientific Committee. J. Cetacean Res. Manage.SUPPL7:1-62.
11. International Whaling Commission. 2005b. Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex D. Report of the Sub-Committee on the Revised Management Procedure. Appendix 2. Requirements and Guidelines for Implementation. J. Cetacean Res. Manage.SUPPL7:84-92.
12. International Whaling Commission. 2007. Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex D. Report of the Sub-Committee on the Revised Management Procedure. Appendix 6. The specifications for the Implementation Simulation Trials for western North Pacific Bryde's whales. J. Cetacean Res. Manage.SUPPL9:114-124
13. Perryman, W.L., Donahue, M.A., Perkins, P.C. and Reilly, S.B. 2002. Gray whale calf production 1994-2000: Are observed fluctuations related to changes in seasonal ice cover? Mar. Mammal Sci. 18(1): 121-144
14. Punt, A.E. 2006. The FAO Precautionary Approach after almost 10 years: Have we progressed towards implementing simulation-tested feeback-control management systems for fisheries management. Nat. Resour. Modeling 19: 441-464
15. Punt, A.E. and Donovan, G.P. 2007. Developing management procedures that are robust to uncertainty: lessons from the International Whaling Commission. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64: 603-612