Streamlined Injury Assessment and Restoration Planning in the U.S. National Marine Sanctuaries

Coral Reef Restoration Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 167-192

  Symons, Lisa C ^a   Stratton, Alice ^a   Goodwin, William ^b  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b PBS J   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68649119210     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Hudson, J.H. and Goodwin, W.B., Assessment of vessel grounding injury to coral reef and seagrass habitats in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, Florida: protocol and methods, Bull. Mar. Sci., 69, 509, 2001.
2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental assessment, R/V Columbus Iselin grounding site restoration, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, Monroe County, FL, prepared by TetraTech, Fairfax, VA, 1999.
3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental assessment: M/VWellwood grounding site restoration, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, Monroe County, FL, 2002.
4. Michel, J. and Helton, D., Environmental considerations during wreck removal and scuttling, Meeting of the American Salvage Association, 2003.
5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental assessment for the structural restoration of the M/V Alec Owen Maitland grounding site, Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary, Florida, prepared by Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA, 1995.
6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Habitat equivalency analysis: an overview, http://www.darp.noaa.gov/library/pdf/heaoverv.pdf. Damage Assessment Center, National Ocean Service, NOAA. Silver Spring, MD, 1995 (revised 2000).
7. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental assessment for the structural restoration of the M/VElpis grounding site, Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary, Florida, prepared by Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA, 1995.
8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, R/V Columbus Iselin grounding lost use damages Looe Key Reef, Looe Key National Marine Sanctuary, prepared by Norman Meade, NOAA Damage Assessment Center, Silver Spring, MD, 1996.
9. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, Final management plan/environmental impact statement, Volume II, NOAA. Silver Spring, MD, 1996.
10. Crisp, D. and Ryland, J., Influence of filming and surface texture on the settlement of marine organisms, Nature, 185, 119, 1960.
11. Endean, R., Destruction and recovery of coral reef communities, in Biology and Geology of Coral Reefs. Volume III: Biology 2, Jones, O. and Endean, R. Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1976.
12. Perry, C., Reef framework preservation in four contrasting modern reef environments, Discovery Bay, Jamaica, J. Coastal Rec., 15, 796, 1999.
13. Blanchon, P., Jones, B., and Kalbfleisch, W., Anatomy of a fringing reef around Grand Cayman: storm rubble, not coral framework, J. Sed. Res. (A: Sedimentary Petroleum Processes), 67, 1, 1997.
14. Riegl, B. and Luke, K., Ecological parameters of dynamited reefs in the northern Red Sea and their relevance to reef rehabilitation, Mar. Poll. Bull., 37, 488, 1998.
15. Gittings, S., et al, The recovery process in a mechanically damaged coral reef community: recruitment and growth, in Proc. 6th Int. Coral Reef Symp., Choat, J.H., et al., Eds., Townsville, Australia, 1998, 225.
16. Zobrist, E., Coral reef restoration and protection from vessel groundings, Gulf Res. Reports, 10, 85, 1999.
17. Hudson, J.H. and Diaz, R., Damage survey and restoration of M/V Wellwood grounding site, Molasses Reef, Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary, Florida, in Proc. 6th Int. Coral Reef Symp., Choat, J.H., et al., Eds., Townsville, Australia, 1998, 231.
18. ECM/Hudson Maritime Services LLC, Contship Houston restoration project: second reef monitoring program event, including new baseline survey, Report to the National Marine Sanctuaries Division, Office of Coastal Resource Management, NOAA, Wilton, CT, 1999.
19. Gleason, D.F., Brazeau, D.A., and Munfus, D., Can self-fertilizing coral species be used to enhance restoration of Caribbean reefs? Bull. Mar. Sci., 69, 933, 2001.
20. Jaap, W. C., Coral reef restoration, Ecol. Eng., 15, 345, 2000.
21. Jaap, W. C. and Morelock, J., Two-year monitoring report: Soto's Reef restoration project, George Town, Grand Cayman Island, British West Indies, Lithophyte Research and Marine Research Associates, 1998.
22. Stratton, A, An innovative method to restore coral reefs using gorgonian clippings for transplantation. M.S. Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, 2001.
23. Van Treeck, P. and Schuhmacher, H., Initial survival of coral nubbins transplanted by a new coral transplantation technology — options for reef rehabilitation, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 150, 287, 1997.
24. Van Treeck, P. and Schuhmacher, H., Mass diving tourism — a new dimension calls for new management approaches, Mar. Poll. Bull., 37, 499, 1998.
25. Van Treeck, P. and Schuhmacher, H., Artificial reefs created by electrolysis and coral transplantation, Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 49, 75, 1999.
26. Morse, D. et al., Morphogen-based chemical flypaper for Agaricia humilis coral larvae, Biol. Bull.,186, 172, 1994.
27. Morse, A. and Morse, D., Flypapers for coral and other planktonic larvae, BioScience, 46, 254, 1996.
28. Bak, R., Recruitment patterns and mass mortalities in the sea urchin Diadema antillarum, in Proc. of the 5th Int. Coral Reef Cong., Harmelin-Vivien, M., et al. (Eds.), Antenne Museum-EPHE, Moorea (French Polynesia), 1985, 267.
29. Lessios, H.A., Diadema antillarum 10 years after mass mortality: still rare, despite help from a competitor, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 259: 331, 1995.
30. Nedimyer, K. and Moe, M.A. Jr., Techniques development for the reestablishment of the long-spined sea urchin, Diadema antillarum, on two small patch reefs in the upper Florida Keys, Report to NOAA, 2003.