Influence of response shift on evaluations of change in patient-reported outcomes

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 479-489

  Ahmed, Sara ^a   Ring, Lena ^b  

^a School of Physical Therapy   (Canada)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Change; Coping; Health related quality of life; Patient reported outcomes; Response shift

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL CARE; INDIVIDUALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT RELATED OUTCOME; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SELF EVALUATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 68649119106     PISSN: 14737167     EISSN: 17448379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14737167.8.5.479     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Donaldson M. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical oncology practice: benefits, challenges and next steps. Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 6(1), 87-95 (2006).
2. Stull DE, Leidy NK, Jones PW, Stahl E. Measuring functional performance in patients with COPD: a discussion of patient-reported outcome measures. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 23(11), 2655-2665 (2007).
3. Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc. Sci. Med. 60(4), 833-843 (2005).
4. Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder CF. Patient-reported outcomes in cancer: a review of recent research and policy initiatives. CA Cancer J. Clin. 57(5), 278-300 (2007).
5. Haywood KL. Patient-reported outcome II: selecting appropriate measures for musculoskeletal care. Musculoskeletal Care 5(2), 72-90 (2007).
6. Bradley C. Feedback on the FDA's February 2006 draft guidance on patient reported outcome (PRO) measures from a developer of PRO measures. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 4, 78 (2006).
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 4, 79 (2006).
8. Snyder CF, Watson ME, Jackson JD, Cella D, Halyard MY, Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group. Patient-reported outcome instrument selection: designing a measurement strategy. Value Health 10 (Suppi.2), S76-S85 (2007).
9. Martz E, Livneh H, Priebe M, Wuermser LA, Ottomanelli L. Predictors of psychosocial adaptation among people with spinal cord injury or disorder. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86 (6), 1182-1192 (2005).
10. Galvin LR, Godfrey HP. The impact of coping on emotional adjustment to spinal cord injury (SCI): review of the literature and application of a stress appraisal and coping formulation. Spinal Cord 39 (12), 615-627 (2001).
11. Daltroy LH, Larson MG, Eaton HM, Phillips CB, Liang MH. Discrepancies between self-reported and observed physical function in the elderly: the influence of response shift and other factors. Soc. Sci. Med. 48 (11), 1549-1561 (1999).
12. Padilla GV, Mishel MH, Grant MM. Uncertainty, appraisal and quality of life. Qual. Life Res. 1(3), 155-165 (1992).
13. Kagawa-Singer M. Redefining health: living with cancer. Soc. Sci. Med. 37(3), 295-304 (1993).
14. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MAG; American Psychological Association. Adaptation to changing health response shift in quality-of-life research. 11(2), 185-187 (2000).
15. Aristotle. Aristotle in 23 Volumes. H. Rackham (Ed). William Heinemann Harvard University Press, London, UK (1934).
16. Heraclitus. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: an Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Kahn CH (Ed). Cambridge University Press, London, UK (1981).
17. Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc. Sci. Med. 48(8), 977-988 (1999).
18. Levine S, Feldman JJ, Elinson J. Does medical care do any good? In: Handbook of Health, Health Care and the Health Professions. Mechanic D (Ed.). Free Press, NY, USA (1983).
19. Levine S. The changing terrains in medical sociology: emergent concern with quality of life. J. Health Soc. Behav. 28(1), 1-6 (1987).
20. Koch T. The illusion of paradox: commentary on Albrecht, G.L. and Devlieger, P.J. (1998). The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Social Science & Medicine 48, 977-988. Soc. Sci. Med. 50(6), 757-759 (2000).
21. Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL; RRTC Expert Panel on Health Status Measurement. Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88(4), 529-536 (2007).
22. Schwartz CE, Sendor M. Helping others helps oneself. response shift effects in peer support. Soc. Sci. Med. 48(11), 1563-1575 (1999).
23. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Soc. Sci. Med. 48(11), 1531-1548 (1999).
24. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MAG. Introduction to symposium on the challenge of response shift in social science and medicine. Soc. Sci. Med. 48, 1505-1506 (1999).
25. Schwartz CE, Bode R, Repucci N, Becker J, Sprangers MA, Fayers PM. The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift. Qual. Life Res. 15(9), 1533-1550 (2006).
26. Berzon R, Hays RD, Shumaker SA. International use, application and performance of health-related quality of life instruments. Qual. Lift Res. 2(6), 367-368 (1993).
27. Oort FJ, Visser MRM, Spranger M. Incorporating the Then Test into the structural equation modeling (SEM) apporach to response shift detection. Qual. Lift Res. 12, 784 (2004).
28. Visser MR, Oort FJ, Spranger M. Assessing response shift in QL; the Then Test and structural equation modeling approach compared. Qual. Lift Res. 12, 765 (Abstract) (2003).
29. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Cohen R. The structural equation modeling technique did not show a response shift, contrary to the results of the Then Test and the individualized approaches. J Clin. Epidemiol. 58, 1125-1133 (2005).
30. Joore MA, Potjewijd J, Timmerman AA, Anteunis LJ. Response shift in the measurement of quality of life in hearing impaired adults after hearing aid fitting. Qual. Life Res. 11(4), 299-307 (2002).
31. Timmerman AA, Anteunis LJ, Meesters CM. Response-shift bias and parent-reported quality of life in children with otitis media. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 129(9), 987-991 (2003).
32. Razmjou H, Yee A, Ford M, Finkelstein JA. Response shift in outcome assessment in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88(12), 2590-2595 (2006).
33. Woolhead GM, Donovan JL, Dieppe PA, Outcomes of total knee replacement: a qualitative study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44(8), 1032-1037 (2005).
34. Ring L, Hofer S, Heuston F, Harris D, O'Boyle CA. Response shift masks the treatment impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs): the example of individual quality of life in edentulous patients. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 3, 55 (2005).
35. Osborne RH, Hawkins M, Sprangers MA. Change of perspective: a measurable and desired outcome of chronic disease self-management intervention programs that violates the premise of preintervention/postintervention assessment. Arthritis Rheum. 55(3), 458-465 (2006).
36. Postulart D, Adang EM. Response shift and adaptation in chronically ill patients. Med. Decis. Making 20(2), 186-193 (2000).
37. Golembiewski RT, Billingsley K, Yeager S. Measuring change and persistence in human affairs - types of change generated by od designs. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 12(2), 133-157 (1976).
38. Howard GS, Bray JH. Internal invalidity in studies employing self-report instruments: a suggested remedy. JEM 16(2), 129-135 (1979).
39. Terborg JR, Howard GS, Maxwell SE. Evaluating planned organizational change: a method for assessing α, β, and γ change. Acad. Manage Rev. 5(1), 109-121 (1980).
40. Howard GS. Response-shift bias: a source of contamination of self-report measures. J Appl. Psychol. 64(2), 144-150 (1979).
41. Howard GS, Gulanick NA. The feasibility of informed pretests in attenuating response-shift bias. Applied Psychological Measurement 3(4), 481-494 (1979).
42. Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc. Sci. Med. 48(11), 1507-1515 (1999).
43. Rapkin BD, Schwartz CE. Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2, 14 (2004).
44. Schwartz CE, Rapkin BD. Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2, 16 (2004).
45. Cronbach LJ, Furby L. How should we measure "change"-or should we? Psychol. Bull. 74, 68-80 (1970).
46. Fava GA, Ruini C. Development and characteristics of a well-being enhancing psychotherapeutic strategy: well-being therapy. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 34(1), 45-63 (2003).
47. Howard GS. Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 3(1), 1-23 (1979).
48. Norman P. The interpretation of change in verbal reports: implications for health psychology. Psychol. Health 11(2), (1996).
49. Broberger E, Sprangers M, Tishelman C. Do internal standards of quality of life change in lung cancer patients? Nurs. Res. 55(4), 274-282 (2006).
50. Visser MR, Oort FJ, Sprangers MA. Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: a convergent validity study. Qual, Life Res. 14(3), 629-639 (2005).
51. Jansen SJ, Stiggelbout AM, Nooij MA, Noordijk EM, Kievit J. Response shift in quality of life measurement in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Qual. Life Res. 9(6), 603-615 (2000).
52. Bernhard J, Horny C, Maibach R, Herrmann R, Laffer U. Quality of life as subjective experience: refraining of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Ann. Oncol. 10(7), 775-782 (1999).
53. Schwartz CE, Feinberg RG, Jilinskaia E, Applegate JC. An evaluation of a psychosocial intervention for survivors of childhood cancer: paradoxical effects of response shift over time. Psycbooncology 8(4), 344-354 (1999).
54. Sprangers MA, Van Dam FS, Broersen J et al. Revealing response shift in longitudinal research on fatigue - the use of the then test approach. Acta Oncol. (Madr.) 38(6), 709-718 (1999).
55. Visser MR, Smets EM, Sprangers MA, De Haes HJ. How response shift may affect the measurement of change in fatigue. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 20(1), 12-18 (2000).
56. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Cohen SR. Response shift influenced estimates of change in health-related quality of life poststroke. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 57(6), 561-570 (2004).
57. Norman G. Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies. Qual. Life Res. 12, 239-249 (2003).
58. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Cohen SR. Response shift influenced estimates of change in health-related quality of life poststroke. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 57(6), 561-570 (2004).
59. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MAG, Carey A, Reed G. Exploring response shift in longitudinal data. Psychol. Health 19(1), 51-69 (2004).
60. Joyce CRB, Hickey A, McGee HM, O'Boyle CA. A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: the SEIQoL. Qual. Life Res. 12(3), 275-280 (2003).
61. Clarke S, Hickey A, O'Boyle C, Hardiman O. Assessing individual quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Qual. Life Res. 10(2), 149-158 (2001).
62. Hickey AM, Bury G, Oboyle CA, Bradley F, Okelly FD, Shannon W. A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV AIDS. Br. Med. J. 313(7048), 29-33 (1996).
63. Tully MP, Cantrill JA. The validity of the modified patient generated index - 2 quantitative and qualitative approach. Qual. Life Res. 9(5), 509-520 (2000).
64. Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Russell IT. Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions. Qual. in Health Care 8(1), 22-29 (1999).
65. Ahmed S, Mayo N, Hanley J, Wood-Dauphinee S. Individualized health-related quality of life (HRQL) post stroke: revealing response shift. Qual. Life Res. 12, 765 (Abstract) (2003).
66. Rasanen P, Roine E, Sintonen H, Semberg-Konttinen V, Ryynanen OP, Roine R. Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 22(2), 235-241 (2006).
67. Brauer CA, Rosen AB, Greenberg D, Neumann PJ. Trends in the measurement of health utilities in published cost-utility analyses. Value Health 9(4), 213-218 (2006).
68. Kaplan RM. Utility assessment. In: Valuing Health Care: Costs, Benefits and Effectiveness of Pharmaceuticals and Other Medical Technologies. Sloan FA (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, NY, USA (1995).
69. Brazier J, Akehurst R, Brennan A et al. Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states? Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 4(4), 201-208 (2005).
70. Lenert LA, Treadwell JR, Schwartz CE. Associations between health status and utilities: indirect evidence for response shift. In: Adaptation to changing health response shift in quality- of- life research. Schwartz CE, Sprangers; MAG (Eds). American Psychological Association, Washington DC, USA (2000).
71. Oort FJ. Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Qual. Life Res. 14(3), 587-598 (2005).
72. Oort FJ, Visser MR, Sprangers MA. An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery. Qual. Life Res. 14(3), 599-609 (2005).
73. Schmitt N, Pulakos E, Lieblein A. Comparison of three techniques to assess group-level β and γ change. Applied Psychological Measurement 8, 249-260 (1984).
74. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Corbiere M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley J, Cohen R. Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: true change or response shift? Qual. Life Res. 14(3), 611-627 (2005).
75. Schmitt N. The use of analysis of covariance structures to assess β and γ change. Multivariate Behav. Res. 17(3), 343-358 (1982).
76. Mayo NE, Scott SC, Dendukuri N, Ahmed S, Wood-Dauphinee S. Identifying response shift statistically at the individual level. Qual. Life Res. 17(4), 627-639 (2008).
77. Rapkin BD, Dumont KA. Methods for identifying and assessing groups in health behavioral research. Addiction 95(Suppl.3), S395-S417 (2000).
78. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Cohen SR. The structural equation modeling technique did not show a response shift, contrary to the results of the then test and the individualized approaches. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 58(11), 1125-1133 (2005).
79. Li Y, Rapkin B. Their personal meaning of quality of life and frame of reference. Qual. Life Res. 15(Suppl. 1), A-36 (2006).
80. Bernhard J, Lowy A, Mathys N, Herrmann R, Hurny C. Health related quality of life: a changing construct? Qual. Life Res. 13(7), 1187-1197 (2004).
81. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MAG. Introduction to symposium on The Challenge of Response Shift in Social Science and Medicine. Soc. Sci. Med. 48, 1505-1506 (1990).