Fish habitat: Making the best use of modeled data: Multiple approaches to sensitivity analysis of a fish-habitat model

Fisheries

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 330-339

  Steel, E Ashley ^a   McElhany, Paul ^b   Avery, Karen A ^b   Yoder, Naomi J ^c   Bowen, Mark D ^c   Purser, Michael D ^d   Malone, Kevin ^e   Thompson, Brad E ^f,g   Busack, Craig ^g   Jensen, David ^h   Blair, Greg ⁱ   Hubble, Joel ^c   Kantz, Tom ^j  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b NWFSC   (United States)

^c U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION   (United States)

^d Snohomish County   (United States)

^e Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ^*

^f WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

^g US Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

^h ICF Jones and Stokes   (United States)

ⁱ US Bureau of Reclamation   (United States)

^j Pierce College   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68649114569     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446-34.7.330     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beverton, R. J. H., and S. J. Holt. 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Investigations 2: 1-533.
2. Blair, G. R., L. C. Lestelle, and L. E. Mobrand. In press. The Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment Model: a tool for assessing salmonid performance potential based on habitat conditions. In E. Knudson and H. Michael, eds. Pacific salmon environment and life history models: advancing science for sustainable salmon in the future. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
3. Busack, C. A., and B. E. Thompson. 2006. Improving salmon habitat productivity models for setting escapement goals and prioritizing habitat recovery funding. Final report to the Pacific Salmon Commission, Project SF-2006-H-27, Dec 15. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia.
4. Gaff, H., J. Chick, J. Trexler, D. DeAngelis, L. Gross, and R. Salinas. 2004. Evaluation of and insights from ALFISH : a spatially explicit, landscape-level simulation of fish populations in the Everglades. Hydrobiologia 520:73-87.
5. Haefner, J. W. 2005. Modeling biological systems: principles and applications. 2nd Edition. Springer, Inc., New York.
6. Independent Science Advisory Board (ISAB). 2001. Model synthesis report: an analysis of decision support tools used in Columbia River basin salmon management. ISAB , Portland, Oregon. Available at: www.nwcouncil.org/ library/isab/isab2001-1.pdf (Accessed 15 Nov 2007).
7. Lestelle, L. C., B. Watson, and G. Blair. 2006. Species-habitat rules: Supporting documentation for updated flow rules for application in EDT. Mobrand, Jones & Stokes, Vashon, Washington. Available at: www.jonesandstokes.com/index.php?option=com-docman&task=doc- download&gid=121 (Accessed 15 Nov 2007).
8. Lichatowich, J. A., and L. E. Mobrand. 1995. Analysis of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River from an ecosystem perspective, Mobrand Biometrics. Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon. Available at: http://pisces.bpa.gov/release/documents/documentviewer.aspx?doc=25105-2 (Accessed 15 Nov 2007).
9. Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board. 2004. Lower Columbia salmon recovery and fish and wildlife plan. Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board, Longview, Washington. Available at: www.lcfrb.gen.wa.us/ December%20Final%20%20Plans/lower-columbia-salmon-recovery-a.htm (Accessed 14 June 14, 2007).
10. McElhany, P., E. A. Steel, D. W. Jensen, K. Avery, N. Yoder, B. Thompson, and C. Busack. In press. Dealing with uncertainty in ecosystem models: lessons from a complex salmon model. Ecological Applications.
11. Mobrand, L. E., J. A. Lichatowich, L. C. Lestelle, and T. S. Vogel. 1997. An approach to describing ecosystem performance "through the eyes of salmon." Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2964-2973.
12. Moussalli, E., and R. Hilborn. 1986. Optimal stock size and harvest rate in multistage life history models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43(1):135-141.
13. Northwest Hydraulic Consultants. 2005. Final report-Instream flow assessment pilot project. Prepared for Shared Strategy for Puget Sound, USA. Available at: www.sharedsalmonstrategy.org/resources.htm#water-quantity (Accessed 14 June 2007).
14. Northwest Power and Conservation Council. 2005. Subbasin plans in Columbia River basin fish and wildlife program. Northwest Power and Conservation Council, Portland, Oregon. Available at: www.nwcouncil.org/library/2000/2000- 19/FullReport.pdf (Accessed 15 Nov 2007).
15. Quinn, T. 2005. The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. American Fisheries Society and University of Washington Press, Seattle.
16. Saltelli, A., K. Chan, and E. M. Scott (editors). 2000a. Sensitivity analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK.
17. Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, and F. Campolongo. 2000b. Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modeling. Statistical Science 15(4):377-395.
18. Shared Strategy Development Committee. 2007. Puget Sound salmon recovery plan. Shared Strategy Development Committee, Seattle, Washington. Available at: www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Recovery-Planning/Recovery-Domains/Puget- Sound/PS-Recovery-Plan.cfm (Accessed 14 June 2007).
19. Sobol, I. M. 1993. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiment 1:407-414.
20. Smith, A.D.M., E.J. Fulton, A.J. Hobday, D.C. Smith, and P. Shoulder. 2007. Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 633-639.
21. Steel, E. A., T. J. Beechie, M. Ruckelshaus, A. H. Fullerton, P. McElhany, and P. Roni. In press. Mind the gap: uncertainty and model communication between managers and scientists. In E. Knudson and H. Michael, eds. Pacific salmon environment and life history models: advancing science for sustainable salmon in the future. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
22. Yoder, N. J., M. D. Bowen, K. P. Zehfuss, J. Hubble, B. Watson, B G. R. Blair. 2006. Systematic sensitivity analysis of the EDT model applied to selected fish populations in the