Scholarly journal evaluation based on panel data analysis

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 312-320

  Yu, Liping ^a   Shen, Xiaoming ^b   Pan, Yuntao ^a   Wu, Yishan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION OF CHINA   (China)

^b CHANGZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Heuristic methods; Indicator selection; MAE (Multiple Attribute Evaluation); Panel data analysis; Scholarly journal; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

EID: 68649106611     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Braun T., and Glänzel W. World flash on basic research. A topographical approach to world publication output and performance in science, 1981-1985. Scientometrics 19 3-4 (1990) 159-165
2. Esty D.C., LeVy M.A., Srebotnjak T., de Sherbinin A., Kim C.H., and Anderson B. Pilot environmental performance index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy (2006) (chapter 3)
3. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178 (1972) 471-479
4. Garfield E. Significant journals of science. Nature 264 (1976) 609-615
5. Hirsch J.E. An index to qualify an individual's scientific research output. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences 102 46 (2005) 16569-16572
6. Hwang C.L., and Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications (1981), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
7. "Review of Pareto's Cours d' Ēconomie politique, Vol. 2" by Georges Sorel, 1897, Le devenir social, Ann. 3, N. 5, May.
8. Markpin T., Boonradsamee B., Ruksinsut K., Yochai W., Premkamolnetr N., Ratchatahirun P., and Sombatsompop N. Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database. Scientometrics 75 2 (2008) 251-261
9. Martin B.R. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics 36 (1996) 343-362
10. Moed H.F., De Bruin R.E., and van Leeuwen T.N. New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance, database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics 33 3 (1995) 381-422
11. Sagar A.D., and Najam A. The human development index, a critical review. Ecological Economics 25 3 (1998) 249-264
12. Schubert A., Glänzel W., and Braun T. Relative citation rate: a new indicator for measuring the impact of publications. In: Tomov D., and Dimitrova L. (Eds). Proceeding of the first national conference with international participation on scientometrics and linguistics of scientific text. Varna (pp. 80-81) (1983)
13. van Leeuwen Th.N., Visser M.S., Moed H.F., Nederhof T.J., and van Raan A.F.J. The holy grail of science policy: exploring and combining biblometic tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics 57 2 (2000) 257-280
14. Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics 10 3-4 (1986) 157-177
15. Vinkler P. Composite scientometric indicators for evaluating publications of research institutes. Scientometrics 68 3 (2006) 629-642
16. Wu Y.S., Pan Y.T., Zhang Y.H., Ma Z., Pang J.G., Guo H., Xu B., and Yang Z.Q. China scientific and technical papers and citations (CSTPC): history, impact and outlook. Scientometrics 60 3 (2004) 385-394
17. Yue W.P., and Wilson C.S. Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology: a structural equation modeling analysis. Scientometrics 60 3 (2004) 317-334