Embryonic development of the scorpionfly Panorpa emarginata Cheng with special reference to external morphology (Mecoptera: Panorpidae)

Journal of Morphology

Volumn 270, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 984-995

  Du, Xiaoliang ^a   Yue, Chao ^a   Hua, Baozhen ^a  

^a NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Embryogenesis; Embryology; Mecoptera; Morphology; Panorpa; Panorpidae

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; INSECT; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; TIME; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALS; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; INSECTS; TIME FACTORS; ZYGOTE;

ENDOPTERYGOTA; MECOPTERA; PANORPA; PANORPIDAE;

EID: 68649105710     PISSN: 03622525     EISSN: 10974687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10736     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Angelini DR, Kaufman TC. 2005. Insect appendages and comparative ontogenetics. Dev Biol 286:57-77.
2. Birket-Smith SJR. 1984. Prolegs, Legs and Wings of Insects. Entomonograph, Vol 5. Copenhagen: Scandinavian Science, pp 1-128.
3. Boyan GS, Williams JLD, Posser S, Braunig P. 2002. Morphological and molecular data argue for the labrum being non-apical, articulated, and the appendage of the intercalary segment in the locust. Arthropod Struct Dev 31:65-76.
4. Boyan GS, Braunig P, Posser S, Williams JLD. 2003. Embryonic development of the sensory innervation of the clypeo-labral complex: Further support for serially homologous appendages in the locust. Arthropod Struct Dev 32:289-302.
5. Budd GE. 2002. A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem. Nature 417:271-275.
6. Byers GW. 1963. The life history of Panorpa nuptialis (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 56:142-149.
7. Byers GW, Thornhill R. 1983. Biology of the Mecoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 28:203-228.
8. Cheng FY. 1949. New species of Mecoptera from northwest China. Psysche 56:139-173.
9. Fleig R. 1994. Head segmentation in the embryo of the Colorado beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata as seen with anti-en immu-nostaining. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 203:227-229.
10. Haas MS, Brown SJ, Beeman RW. 2001a. Pondering the procephalon: The segmental origin of the labrum. Dev Genes Evol 211:89-95.
11. Haas MS, Brown SJ, Beeman RW. 2001b. Homeotic evidence for the appendicular origin of the labrum in Tribolium castaneum. Dev Genes Evol 211:96-102.
12. Hinton HE. 1958. The phylogeny of the panorpoid orders. Annu Rev Entomol 3:181-206.
13. Jockusch EL, Williams TA, Nagy LM. 2004. The evolution of patterning of serially homologous appendages in insects. Dev Genes Evol 214:324-338.
14. Kimm MA, Prpic NM. 2006. Formation of the arthropod labrum by fusion of paired and rotated limb-bud-like primordia. Zoomorphology 125:147-155.
15. Kukalova-Peck J. 2008. Phylogeny of higher taxa in Insecta: Finding synapomorphies in the extant fauna and separating them from homoplasies. Evol Biol 35:4-51.
16. Machida R. 2000. Serial homology of the mandible and maxilla in the jumping bristletail Pedetontus unimaculatus Machida, based on external embryology (Hexapoda: Archaeognatha. Machilidae). J Morphol 245:19-28.
17. Matsuda R. 1976. Morphology and Evolution of the Insect Abdomen. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
18. Miyake T. 1912. The life-history of Panorpa klugi MacLachlan. J Coll Agric Imp Univ Tokyo 4:117-139.
19. Rempel JG. 1975. The evolution of the insect head: the endless dispute. Quaest Entomol 11:7-25.
20. Rogers BT, Kaufman TC. 1996. Structure of the insect head as revealed by the en protein pattern in developing embryos. Development 122:3419-3432.
21. Rogers BT, Peterson MD, Kaufman TC. 2002. The development and evolution of insect mouthparts as revealed by the expres-sion patterns of gnathocephalic genes. Evol Dev 4:96-110.
22. Russell LK. 1982. The life history of Caurinus dectes Russell with a description of the immature stages (Mecoptera: Boreidae). Entomol Scand 13:225-235.
23. Scholtz G, Edgecombe GD. 2005. Heads, Hox and the phylogenetic position of trilobites. In: Koenemann S, Jenner R, editors. Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships. Boca Raton: CRC. pp 139-165.
24. Schmidt-Ott U, Technau GM. 1992. Expression of en and wg in the embryonic head and brain of Drosophila indicates a refolded band of seven segment remnants. Development 116:111-125.
25. Snodgrass RE. 1935. Principles of Insect Morphology. New York: McGraw-Hill.667 p.
26. Suzuki N. 1990. Embryology of the Mecoptera (Panorpidae. Panorpodidae, Bittacidae, and Boreidae). Bull Sugadaira Montane Res Ctr 11:1-87.
27. Suzuki Y, Palopoli MF. 2001. Evolution of insect abdominal appendages: Are prolegs homologous or convergent traits? Dev Genes Evol 211:486-492.
28. Uchifune T, Machida R. 2005. Embryonic development of Galloisiana yuasai Asahina, with special reference to external morphology (Insecta: Grylloblattodea). J Morphol 266:182-207.
29. Yie ST. 1951. The biology of Formosan Panorpidae and morphology of eleven species of their immature stages. Mem Coll Agri Nat Taiwan Univ 2:1-111.
30. Younossi-Hartenstein A, Tepass U, Hartenstein V. 1993. Embryonic origin of the imaginal discs of the head of Drosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 203:60-73.